- This topic has 38 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Don’t buy into this “today’s game is a freebie”…..today’s game is 3pts up for grabs and possibly championship football next season a huge step closer. Yes of course they’re a good side but ain’t no Man City so I’m going 3-1 Wigan….
Well done lads….brilliant hard fought point. Byrnes crosses poor and sorry Garner instead of Clarke who still cant fathom offside rule or how to hold ball up. Could have been so much more but happy with point.
Well done lads….brilliant hard fought point. Byrnes crosses poor and sorry Garner instead of Clarke who still cant fathom offside rule or how to hold ball up. Could have been so much more but happy with point.So enough balls for you today?. We just outplayed for long periods of the game, the best team in this division. Can’t believe you still found something to moan about.
Still not in bottom 3.From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!Done 1 moron…Please tell me Clarke had good un….lots of running for once,couldn’t keep the out ball ,stay on side and waits for ball to land on him at set pieces. Still great point just pity we cant keep hold or increase these leads. Can’t say I was overly I.pressed with Norwich either….but they top for a reason.
No bad words for any player on that pitch today. All gave 110% including Clarke who had a goal chalked off for his hand being offside.
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!Thought Clarke had a good game to be honest and the only time he was offside was when he scored and that’s debatable.
When I saw the team I feared for us but worked well negated there wing backs.
Yet again though cooks subs didn’t help. Has he made one yet thats benefited us. What is the point of Josh Windass?
The injury to Fox may prove very costly.
I’m not a fan of Clarke, but he gave his all today. Yes he could have scored with his 1 on 1 chance, & when he missed – you just knew it. And his goal was not offside. But they all played well today & showed a lot of fight.
Thought Clarke had a good game to be honest and the only time he was offside was when he scored and that’s debatable.When I saw the team I feared for us but worked well negated there wing backs.
Yet again though cooks subs didn’t help. Has he made one yet thats benefited us. What is the point of Josh Windass?
The injury to Fox may prove very costly.
Not a bad player but a bit like Pilkington not a bit of use to us picking up so many injuries.
What is the use of Josh Windass? He hasn’t got a use at this level. Could prove himself next season if we are relegated. Inspired substitutions. As I am away on hols and not there today why were both the wingers replaced by non wingers?Thought Clarke had a good game to be honest and the only time he was offside was when he scored and that’s debatable.
When I saw the team I feared for us but worked well negated there wing backs.
Yet again though cooks subs didn’t help. Has he made one yet thats benefited us. What is the point of Josh Windass?
The injury to Fox may prove very costly.
As I am away on hols and not there today why were both the wingers replaced by non wingers?[/quote]
Seeing as you have slagged Naismith and Massey off every single game, even when they haven’t played, why would you be bothered that they were subbed?
For the record, Naismith was excellent and should’ve been kept on, Massey was less impressive, and Windass should have gone on in that position instead of Powell.My question was about having two so called wingers playing and replacing them with players who were not wingers.
I was wondering whether it was tactical.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
