› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Team for first leg
- This topic has 17 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 11 months ago by Henry Peacock.
-
AuthorPosts
-
8 May 2014 at 12:07 pm #130734
What XI do we think Uwe will go with tomorrow? I don’t think it will be too different to the cup semi final.
Carson
Perch Boyce Ramis Crainey
McArthur McEachran/Collison
Gomez
McManaman Waghorn Maloney
8 May 2014 at 12:27 pm #130735I doubt & hope that collision is not included not shown us anything special in the games he as played so far, fingers crossed that calamity Caldwell is not in the team !
8 May 2014 at 2:13 pm #130739I doubt & hope that collision is not included not shown us anything special in the games he as played so far, fingers crossed that calamity Caldwell is not in the team !Not really many other options. Would he start with Roger?
8 May 2014 at 3:50 pm #130742Picking up on some of the things Rosler has said, such as the tie not being won or lost in the first leg, I think that he’s going to be relatively cautious tomorrow which I think will mean a set up like the Arsenal game where he played 3/5 (if you include wing backs) at the back.
So with thinking that & looking at his previous few line ups to see who played & how much game tim ethey got I think that the team won’t be to dis-similar to this one:Carson
Boyce Barnett Ramis
Perch Beausejour
McArthur Gomez
McManaman Maloney
FortuneFrom looking at his team last week i think that Perch, Boyce, Barnett, McArthur, Gomez, Beausejour, McManaman & Maloney (none of whom started last week) are shoe ins.
He seems to have settled on Carson as his keeper & I think that Ramis was given 45 minutes against Blackburn just to check he was back fit
So that gives 10 startersThe only debate I can see is what forward he starts with. I think that he’ll go with Fortune coz he worked well in that role against Arsenal & whilst he can’t hit a cow’s @r$e with banjo in front of goal he can keep the opposition defence under pressure, win the ball when it’s cleared logn & hold it up to bring others into play. Waghorn for me is a better finisher but if there was one flaw with the Reading set up it was that when the ball got cleared logn to Waghorn he won nowt & it was just giving away possesion. I think a better team than reading on the day may have been able to exploit that.
Another reason I think he may go for Fortune is that knowing Rosler’s fondness for rotation, Waghorn has started the last 3 games including last week’s – unless Waghorn has become one of the “irreplacables” like McArthur & BoyceNot saying its the team I’d go for but I think its what he’ll go with
8 May 2014 at 5:02 pm #130745That’s a well-reasoned choice.
I just wonder if Uwe will start with a more defensive player – McEachran perhaps – alongside McArthur. In that case, he would have to omit McManaman or Maloney.
But that would reduce our limited goal power still further. And away goals don’t count.
8 May 2014 at 6:00 pm #130747That’s a well-reasoned choice.I just wonder if Uwe will start with a more defensive player – McEachran perhaps – alongside McArthur. In that case, he would have to omit McManaman or Maloney.
But that would reduce our limited goal power still further. And away goals don’t count.
Its an option & was one he used at Wembley, but I just think the fact that he didn’t start with either McManaman or Maloney last week, both of whom are being managed as they come back from injury problems indicates that he’ll start with both of em, maybe with Maloney operating in a more central role off the forwards – “in the hole” as they like to call it.
If QPR sit back like I expect them to he’ll need players who can stretch & pull their defence about to create space for others to exploit & both McManaman & Maloney can do that. I don’t think thats one of Waghorn’s strengths & he appears to me to be more of a grafter
But for me last week’s line up, or more the ommissions, are a strong indicator of the team for tomorrowIn all honesty, I’m not expecting the greatest game tomorrow night
8 May 2014 at 6:01 pm #130748For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3
Carson
perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
mac jordimacman waghorn maloney
dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.
8 May 2014 at 6:10 pm #130749For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3Carson
perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
mac jordimacman waghorn maloney
dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.
Rosler was talking earlier in the week about hpw vital it was having players with big game experience in relegation deciders & cup finals/semi’s so I can’t see him going for Kiernan
Roger I think would be more likely but having just come back from a hernia I don’t think he’d have given him the full 90 last week if he was gonna start with him on Friday. Same with Caldwell8 May 2014 at 7:15 pm #130751For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3
Carson
perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
mac jordimacman waghorn maloney
dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.
Rosler was talking earlier in the week about hpw vital it was having players with big game experience in relegation deciders & cup finals/semi’s so I can’t see him going for Kiernan
Roger I think would be more likely but having just come back from a hernia I don’t think he’d have given him the full 90 last week if he was gonna start with him on Friday. Same with Caldwell[/quote]Did Kiernan play at Brentford last season?
If so then he’ll be one of a few who actually have experience.
8 May 2014 at 7:28 pm #130755Did Kiernan play at Brentford last season?If so then he’ll be one of a few who actually have experience.
No – he played at Brenford for a time but he’d come back by mid February
8 May 2014 at 10:50 pm #130767Ali
Perch Boyce Ramis Barnett Crainey
Macca Jordi
Callum Waggers Shaun
9 May 2014 at 11:04 pm #130812Tonights Team
Wigan XI: Carson, Caldwell, Maloney, Gomez, McManaman, McArthur, Boyce, Beausejour, Perch, Kiernan, Fortune
Subs: Al Habsi, McClean, Espinoza, Barnett, Maynard, Waghorn, Collison
Hmmmmmmm!!!!!
10 May 2014 at 3:00 am #130822Caldwell took great responsibility, taking the ball forward or making forward passes.
We know Fortune is not a goal scorer, but he did his best to hold the ball up, something that Maynard and Waghorn cannot do.
Powell might have been a good substitute.
10 May 2014 at 3:14 am #130824For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3Carson
perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
mac jordimacman waghorn maloney
dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.
Wasn’t far out was I?
10 May 2014 at 3:14 am #1308255 4 1 at home shite shite shite.
Negative shite wont break down negative shite. -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Team for first leg