Team for first leg

Forums Latics Crazy Forum Team for first leg

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #130734
    The EggThe Egg
    Chairman

      What XI do we think Uwe will go with tomorrow? I don’t think it will be too different to the cup semi final.

      Carson

      Perch Boyce Ramis Crainey

      McArthur McEachran/Collison

      Gomez

      McManaman Waghorn Maloney

      #130735
      THE TORCHBERT
      Player

        I doubt & hope that collision is not included not shown us anything special in the games he as played so far, fingers crossed that calamity Caldwell is not in the team !

        #130739
        The EggThe Egg
        Chairman
          I doubt & hope that collision is not included not shown us anything special in the games he as played so far, fingers crossed that calamity Caldwell is not in the team !

          Not really many other options. Would he start with Roger?

          #130742

          Picking up on some of the things Rosler has said, such as the tie not being won or lost in the first leg, I think that he’s going to be relatively cautious tomorrow which I think will mean a set up like the Arsenal game where he played 3/5 (if you include wing backs) at the back.
          So with thinking that & looking at his previous few line ups to see who played & how much game tim ethey got I think that the team won’t be to dis-similar to this one:

          Carson
          Boyce Barnett Ramis
          Perch Beausejour
          McArthur Gomez
          McManaman Maloney
          Fortune

          From looking at his team last week i think that Perch, Boyce, Barnett, McArthur, Gomez, Beausejour, McManaman & Maloney (none of whom started last week) are shoe ins.
          He seems to have settled on Carson as his keeper & I think that Ramis was given 45 minutes against Blackburn just to check he was back fit
          So that gives 10 starters

          The only debate I can see is what forward he starts with. I think that he’ll go with Fortune coz he worked well in that role against Arsenal & whilst he can’t hit a cow’s @r$e with banjo in front of goal he can keep the opposition defence under pressure, win the ball when it’s cleared logn & hold it up to bring others into play. Waghorn for me is a better finisher but if there was one flaw with the Reading set up it was that when the ball got cleared logn to Waghorn he won nowt & it was just giving away possesion. I think a better team than reading on the day may have been able to exploit that.
          Another reason I think he may go for Fortune is that knowing Rosler’s fondness for rotation, Waghorn has started the last 3 games including last week’s – unless Waghorn has become one of the “irreplacables” like McArthur & Boyce

          Not saying its the team I’d go for but I think its what he’ll go with

          #130745

          That’s a well-reasoned choice.

          I just wonder if Uwe will start with a more defensive player – McEachran perhaps – alongside McArthur. In that case, he would have to omit McManaman or Maloney.

          But that would reduce our limited goal power still further. And away goals don’t count.

          #130747
          That’s a well-reasoned choice.

          I just wonder if Uwe will start with a more defensive player – McEachran perhaps – alongside McArthur. In that case, he would have to omit McManaman or Maloney.

          But that would reduce our limited goal power still further. And away goals don’t count.

          Its an option & was one he used at Wembley, but I just think the fact that he didn’t start with either McManaman or Maloney last week, both of whom are being managed as they come back from injury problems indicates that he’ll start with both of em, maybe with Maloney operating in a more central role off the forwards – “in the hole” as they like to call it.
          If QPR sit back like I expect them to he’ll need players who can stretch & pull their defence about to create space for others to exploit & both McManaman & Maloney can do that. I don’t think thats one of Waghorn’s strengths & he appears to me to be more of a grafter
          But for me last week’s line up, or more the ommissions, are a strong indicator of the team for tomorrow

          In all honesty, I’m not expecting the greatest game tomorrow night

          #130748
          loweylowey
          Player

            For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3

            Carson
            perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
            mac jordi

            macman waghorn maloney

            dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.

            #130749
            For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3

            Carson
            perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
            mac jordi

            macman waghorn maloney

            dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.

            Rosler was talking earlier in the week about hpw vital it was having players with big game experience in relegation deciders & cup finals/semi’s so I can’t see him going for Kiernan
            Roger I think would be more likely but having just come back from a hernia I don’t think he’d have given him the full 90 last week if he was gonna start with him on Friday. Same with Caldwell

            #130751
            The EggThe Egg
            Chairman

              For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3

              Carson
              perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
              mac jordi

              macman waghorn maloney

              dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.

              Rosler was talking earlier in the week about hpw vital it was having players with big game experience in relegation deciders & cup finals/semi’s so I can’t see him going for Kiernan
              Roger I think would be more likely but having just come back from a hernia I don’t think he’d have given him the full 90 last week if he was gonna start with him on Friday. Same with Caldwell[/quote]

              Did Kiernan play at Brentford last season?

              If so then he’ll be one of a few who actually have experience.

              #130755
              Did Kiernan play at Brentford last season?

              If so then he’ll be one of a few who actually have experience.

              No – he played at Brenford for a time but he’d come back by mid February

              #130767

              Ali

              Perch Boyce Ramis Barnett Crainey

              Macca Jordi

              Callum Waggers Shaun

              #130812

              Tonights Team

              Wigan XI: Carson, Caldwell, Maloney, Gomez, McManaman, McArthur, Boyce, Beausejour, Perch, Kiernan, Fortune

              Subs: Al Habsi, McClean, Espinoza, Barnett, Maynard, Waghorn, Collison

              Hmmmmmmm!!!!!

              #130822

              Caldwell took great responsibility, taking the ball forward or making forward passes.

              We know Fortune is not a goal scorer, but he did his best to hold the ball up, something that Maynard and Waghorn cannot do.

              Powell might have been a good substitute.

              #130824
              loweylowey
              Player
                For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3

                Carson
                perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
                mac jordi

                macman waghorn maloney

                dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.

                Wasn’t far out was I?

                #130825
                donnys pageDonnys Page
                Player

                  5 4 1 at home shite shite shite.
                  Negative shite wont break down negative shite.

                Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 18 total)
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                Forums Latics Crazy Forum Team for first leg