Team for first leg

Forums Latics Crazy Forum Team for first leg

Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #130826
    loweylowey
    Player
      5 4 1 at home shite shite shite.
      Negative shite wont break down negative shite.

      Or 3-4-3 for the glass half full of us??

      #130835
      jimmycjimmyc
      Player

        Our formation looked different throughout the game for me? 451, 433 and even 442???.

        New it would be a tight game because QPR are very predictable, fe kin ten men behind the ball and tried to catch us on the break…. Boring boring QPR. It’s hard to break down teams that play like that, we have always struggled so suppose Harry did his homework.
        They were scared of Callum but we didn’t use him enough, Dunne was their weak link and we didn’t try him nowhere near enough.

        #130861

        Fortune is a mobile player so, with him in the team, there is a very fluid formation.

        Fortune may not be the goal scorer, but there is likely to be a chance for someone else, as there was for Gomez last night.

        And Fortune does pose defenders some problems. He did win the penalty at the Etihad.

      Viewing 3 posts - 16 through 18 (of 18 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

      Forums Latics Crazy Forum Team for first leg