› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › The Takeover !
- This topic has 55 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 11 months ago by Don.
-
AuthorPosts
-
9 May 2018 at 12:23 am #168984We GOT £3M for the Duke, I think we paid around £1M or a bit less ….that said your overall point remains valid, it was big money then and it’s likely ‘out of our current reach’ money now, unless new investment comes in.
The worry for me is if we don’t get Prem football in two years (and it’s hghly unlikely we will) what will be the position of the Hong Kong group then ? Continue to chase and invest further or will they pull up the drawbridge and cut their losses ?
Correct zeb, Duke was a million and our record spend until we got to the Prem I believe. We didn’t spend millions getting there except on the stadium. Jewells Div 1 team narrowly missed out on promotion first season in Championship.
9 May 2018 at 1:46 am #168986We GOT £3M for the Duke, I think we paid around £1M or a bit less ….that said your overall point remains valid, it was big money then and it’s likely ‘out of our current reach’ money now, unless new investment comes in.The worry for me is if we don’t get Prem football in two years (and it’s hghly unlikely we will) what will be the position of the Hong Kong group then ? Continue to chase and invest further or will they pull up the drawbridge and cut their losses ?
Why not, Wolves just did. From Championship strugglers to runaway promotion in less than twelve months.
9 May 2018 at 2:05 am #168987Quote
Oh, and we are not the Tics we are the Latics.[/quote]
Glad someone thinks the same. I hate the name Tics.
A Tic is a blood sucking parasite that lives off the blood of others. Not a name I would want my club to be associated with :(
Where did this name come from???9 May 2018 at 2:19 am #168988Quote
Oh, and we are not the Tics we are the Latics.A Tic is a blood sucking parasite that lives off the blood of others. Not a name I would want my club to be associated with :(
[/quote]Or it could just be an abbreviation of Latics.
9 May 2018 at 2:26 am #168989Donny, I’m not saying it’s impossible but it is a long shot. With the size and scope of their club, Wolves should have been doing better than they have for some while.
The people putting money in put serious money in for Championship level.
Not to mention the somewhat dodgy advantage the owners had in being big fish in the players agent business?9 May 2018 at 3:03 am #168998Quote
Oh, and we are not the Tics we are the Latics.Glad someone thinks the same. I hate the name Tics.
A Tic is a blood sucking parasite that lives off the blood of others. Not a name I would want my club to be associated with :(
Where did this name come from???[/quote]An abbreviation of an abbreviation.
If we’re being pedantic our nickname is Latics, not “the” Latics, as in “we are not the Tics we are Latics”.9 May 2018 at 5:26 am #168999The worry for me is if we don’t get Prem football in two years (and it’s hghly unlikely we will) what will be the position of the Hong Kong group then ? Continue to chase and invest further or will they pull up the drawbridge and cut their losses ?The alternative is that we don’t have a chance of anything. The Whelan family have invested enough over the years for us to be supremely grateful and can’t be expected to carry on. So we will struggle to survive and may well disappear into obscurity anyway. But this way we get a couple of years of hoping and who knows? It may just work.
If it doesn’t then I genuinely think we won’t be any worse off.
And another thing.
It’s great isn’t it? There are loads of people (I don’t mean regular contributors here, but the “guys in the pub” etc) who don’t put a penny into the club by actually going to games who all have great opinions about how much other people (Whelans, HK investors or whoever) ought to put their money in and question how reliable they are.9 May 2018 at 10:42 am #169000Quote
Oh, and we are not the Tics we are the Latics.Glad someone thinks the same. I hate the name Tics.
A Tic is a blood sucking parasite that lives off the blood of others. Not a name I would want my club to be associated with :(
Where did this name come from???[/quote]Agree with you. Who suddenly decided to try and change something that’s stood for decades? And why? I hate us being referred to as ‘tics’. Really annoys me.
We are Latics. Let’s not lose our identity.
9 May 2018 at 10:49 am #169004Ill tell you what’s wrong with Mr Stones’s remarks, thier buying a club who went to both major Cup Finals and a budgies nad off winning one back to back.
A very well run club unlike some just ask Sunderland. A club that wont cost the earth with an excellent stadium but Mr Stones highlights crowds of 10k ?.
50k+ a week home crowds hasn’t won Newcastle anything bar the Championship.If I were shopping for a budget club with years of experience at been in the Prem, an excellent stadium – training already in place and 1 tier off the big boys then Wigan would be right up there.
You should take time to read what thier worth the takeover gang, it makes interesting reading, a 50million investment would be like me doing a big shop at Asda.
But again our fan base size gets attacked. Without investment we would float around Div1 for the foreseeable future so for me im all up for it.
Lets not forget how and and were we started on this journey and if we ended up back were we started i’ll look at the roller coaster ride with fondness not the crowd size….
Did he mention Saturdays amazing away following taking half our home attendance ? No because it doesn’t make good reading9 May 2018 at 11:04 am #169006Latics mon me, allways have been and allways will be but I dont mind this modern abbreviated tics thing either.
9 May 2018 at 1:37 pm #169008Ill tell you what’s wrong with Mr Stones’s remarks, thier buying a club who went to both major Cup Finals and a budgies nad off winning one back to back.A very well run club unlike some just ask Sunderland. A club that wont cost the earth with an excellent stadium but Mr Stones highlights crowds of 10k ?.
50k+ a week home crowds hasn’t won Newcastle anything bar the Championship.If I were shopping for a budget club with years of experience at been in the Prem, an excellent stadium – training already in place and 1 tier off the big boys then Wigan would be right up there.
You should take time to read what thier worth the takeover gang, it makes interesting reading, a 50million investment would be like me doing a big shop at Asda.
But again our fan base size gets attacked. Without investment we would float around Div1 for the foreseeable future so for me im all up for it.
Lets not forget how and and were we started on this journey and if we ended up back were we started i’ll look at the roller coaster ride with fondness not the crowd size….
Did he mention Saturdays amazing away following taking half our home attendance ? No because it doesn’t make good readingYou make a good argument Cup Winners and I can see that side of it too but I still see nothing wrong with what he’s written as he makes valid points too – all of them.
In every takeover there are going to be arguments for both sides & he is just putting forward one of them, & as i said he’s not said anything that plenty of other Latics mons & monesses have already said.I think what seems to be riling people is that he’s mentioned our crowds. My opinion of that is so what? Its a fact. They are what they are & plenty of Latics people complain about them. I think its also a fact that if crowds stay around that level (and with the relatively low prices that Latics will charge to get in compared with other Championship clubs) then our budget will be low compared to others in the division so it will be difficult (but not impossible) to compete at that level & you (Cup Winners) say so yourself “Without investment we would float around Div1 for the foreseeable future so for me im all up for it”.
PNE & Millwall will also find it difficult (some seasons more so than others). Bournemouth would not have got out (or even into) the Championship without spending the money of their Russian billionaireFor me all this BBC guy is saying is that Latics would struggle in the Championship without outside investment so in that sense its welcome but that there is a cautionary note as we don’t know a great deal about them or what their aims are. Oh & we only get 10k crowds!! ;)
9 May 2018 at 2:04 pm #169009Latics mon me, allways have been and allways will be but I dont mind this modern abbreviated tics thing either.Oldham are Latics as well so personally I don’t mind being a tic, gives us a different identity to our frozen friends up the road.
9 May 2018 at 2:08 pm #169010Latics mon me, allways have been and allways will be but I dont mind this modern abbreviated tics thing either.
Oldham are Latics as well so personally I don’t mind being a tic, gives us a different identity to our frozen friends up the road.[/quote]
I hate being referred to as ‘Tics. It’s Latics always has been & always will be, but I guess this is the modern way of shortening everything such as United supporters calling their ground OT or Liverpool fans & Stevie G or Chelsea & Lamps.
Its harmless but it gets on my wazza & personally I’ll always use Latics
9 May 2018 at 4:16 pm #169016Your actually quite right tilders everything in the game does seem to be shortened as in
AVB
Poch
Becks
Prem
VAR
EFL
PepIf I’m honest I would prefer to be Latics if the name was unique to us. Because it isn’t I’m quite happy to be a tic instead.
9 May 2018 at 7:22 pm #169027Been going around as long as I’ve been watching us in different variants.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › The Takeover !