› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Tis is out of order !
- This topic has 51 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 4 months ago by Garswood_latic.
-
AuthorPosts
-
10 December 2014 at 8:32 pm #136738Christ, being castigated by the most sanctimonious poster on this forum.
Sanctimonious? You need to have a long look in the mirror mate with some of the crap that you’ve dealt on this subject.
Blasphemy works well for you it seems.
10 December 2014 at 8:43 pm #136739Have suggested to the Club that they take a look at that website
As you appear to have taken a lead on this can you ask if they will be requesting that the PCC (Press Complaints Commission) or IPSO (Independent Press Standards Organisation), as is the new organisation, will be approached and any finding printed on the official website?[/quote]
I’d be absolutely embarrassed if the club did anything but ignore it completely. Can’t believe anybody is giving it a moment’s thought. Get over yourselves. The Bolton lad will be made up that you’re even talking about it[/quote]
Yes. That much that he has changed the format of the headline and taken away the offensive accusations for he knows that his stupid and crass actions could have closed down the blog that he writes for. If Cockney Latic had written anything as abusive do you think others would have rolled over and said – “oh look at them and their jolly japes, what a blast?” No they would have complained in the hope that the site was castigated.
And you Sammy, I’m not surprised you applauded Griff’s holier than thou approach the pair of you were jousting on your bloody high horses long enough.
Just remember, because it does not affect or insult you does not mean that it does not others. Your high and mighty attitude to everything you write is actually very pungent and onerous.[/quote]
I am amazed at the hypocrisy. Whelan is being defended on here for making stupid, ill conceived, insulting and dated comments when trying to make light of the pretty untasteful texts Mackay sent yet, when it’s thrown back at them in a very tongue-in-cheek way those same people scream, out of order.[/quote]
Precisely. And our current accuser was one of those who was particularly quick to defend Whelan’s words and tell every one else to get off the PC bandwagon, if I recall correctly. Different now the shoe’s on the other foot. But I was waiting for someone else to point that out.[/quote]
Crikey, no wonder you are such a failed writer when you cannot even grasp the concept of context. I think a revision course on basic creative writing technique is in order for you pal.
10 December 2014 at 8:48 pm #136740I am amazed at the hypocrisy. Whelan is being defended on here for making stupid, ill conceived, insulting and dated comments when trying to make light of the pretty untasteful texts Mackay sent yet, when it’s thrown back at them in a very tongue-in-cheek way those same people scream, out of order.Yes Sammy, I was one of those standing up for Mr Whelan for his unfortunate mutterings which have been seen by most of the country as the utterings of an oldman who should have known better but were never meant to insult nor be offensive.
However, if you think that the headline in that blog was meant as ‘tongue-in-cheek’ then you have clearly missed the tasteless intent meant by his words. There was never any need to fan the flames of what was already a well trodden and discussed episode.
I, am not the hypocrite here, nor am I the ‘hey look at me’ type (as displayed by that beurk and wannabe writer, but I do know what I’m talking about and don’t curry favour by changing what I say to please an audience.
All the best from: Lord Chief Knobhead of the Darby and Joan Club
PS: never seen you in there but I wager we of the same age (or thereabouts)
10 December 2014 at 8:55 pm #136742Christ, being castigated by the most sanctimonious poster on this forum.
Sanctimonious? You need to have a long look in the mirror mate with some of the crap that you’ve dealt on this subject.
Blasphemy works well for you it seems.[/quote]
Not particularly since I’m certainly no God-botherer.
More important things to be concerned about rather than some invisible person in the sky.
10 December 2014 at 8:57 pm #136743Christ, being castigated by the most sanctimonious poster on this forum.
Sanctimonious? You need to have a long look in the mirror mate with some of the crap that you’ve dealt on this subject.
Blasphemy works well for you it seems.[/quote]
Not particularly since I’m certainly no God-botherer.
More important things to be concerned about rather than some invisible person in the sky.[/quote]
Each to their own then.
10 December 2014 at 9:01 pm #136745I am amazed at the hypocrisy. Whelan is being defended on here for making stupid, ill conceived, insulting and dated comments when trying to make light of the pretty untasteful texts Mackay sent yet, when it’s thrown back at them in a very tongue-in-cheek way those same people scream, out of order.
Yes Sammy, I was one of those standing up for Mr Whelan for his unfortunate mutterings which have been seen by most of the country as the utterings of an oldman who should have known better but were never meant to insult nor be offensive.
However, if you think that the headline in that blog was meant as ‘tongue-in-cheek’ then you have clearly missed the tasteless intent meant by his words. There was never any need to fan the flames of what was already a well trodden and discussed episode.
I, am not the hypocrite here, nor am I the ‘hey look at me’ type (as displayed by that beurk and wannabe writer, but I do know what I’m talking about and don’t curry favour by changing what I say to please an audience.
All the best from: Lord Chief Knobhead of the Darby and Joan Club
PS: never seen you in there but I wager we of the same age (or thereabouts)[/quote]
Poor old duffer’s getting confused now Sammy, you’re not having the credit for the Darby and Joan Club line. Perhaps Care Home would have been more apt for our confused, old member. He does seem awfully confused.
10 December 2014 at 9:18 pm #136747I am amazed at the hypocrisy. Whelan is being defended on here for making stupid, ill conceived, insulting and dated comments when trying to make light of the pretty untasteful texts Mackay sent yet, when it’s thrown back at them in a very tongue-in-cheek way those same people scream, out of order.
Yes Sammy, I was one of those standing up for Mr Whelan for his unfortunate mutterings which have been seen by most of the country as the utterings of an oldman who should have known better but were never meant to insult nor be offensive.
However, if you think that the headline in that blog was meant as ‘tongue-in-cheek’ then you have clearly missed the tasteless intent meant by his words. There was never any need to fan the flames of what was already a well trodden and discussed episode.
I, am not the hypocrite here, nor am I the ‘hey look at me’ type (as displayed by that beurk and wannabe writer, but I do know what I’m talking about and don’t curry favour by changing what I say to please an audience.
All the best from: Lord Chief Knobhead of the Darby and Joan Club
PS: never seen you in there but I wager we of the same age (or thereabouts)[/quote]
Poor old duffer’s getting confused now Sammy, you’re not having the credit for the Darby and Joan Club line. Perhaps Care Home would have been more apt for our confused, old member. He does seem awfully confused.[/quote]
The gift that just keeps giving.
I never said nor sttibuted that line to Sammy – tis you who said it for all to see. I was right about the ‘hey look at me’, ‘it were me that wrote that funny’, ‘please like me’ condition that you so surely suffer from.
Oh dear! Now please stop, it is very cold out there, and I can no longer laugh with cracked lips.
10 December 2014 at 9:32 pm #136751I am amazed at the hypocrisy. Whelan is being defended on here for making stupid, ill conceived, insulting and dated comments when trying to make light of the pretty untasteful texts Mackay sent yet, when it’s thrown back at them in a very tongue-in-cheek way those same people scream, out of order.
Yes Sammy, I was one of those standing up for Mr Whelan for his unfortunate mutterings which have been seen by most of the country as the utterings of an oldman who should have known better but were never meant to insult nor be offensive.
However, if you think that the headline in that blog was meant as ‘tongue-in-cheek’ then you have clearly missed the tasteless intent meant by his words. There was never any need to fan the flames of what was already a well trodden and discussed episode.
I, am not the hypocrite here, nor am I the ‘hey look at me’ type (as displayed by that beurk and wannabe writer, but I do know what I’m talking about and don’t curry favour by changing what I say to please an audience.
All the best from: Lord Chief Knobhead of the Darby and Joan Club
PS: never seen you in there but I wager we of the same age (or thereabouts)[/quote]
Poor old duffer’s getting confused now Sammy, you’re not having the credit for the Darby and Joan Club line. Perhaps Care Home would have been more apt for our confused, old member. He does seem awfully confused.[/quote]
The gift that just keeps giving.
I never said nor sttibuted that line to Sammy – tis you who said it for all to see. I was right about the ‘hey look at me’, ‘it were me that wrote that funny’, ‘please like me’ condition that you so surely suffer from.
Oh dear! Now please stop, it is very cold out there, and I can no longer laugh with cracked lips.[/quote]
Cracked is very apt. I can’t/won’t begin to explain how silly you are making yourself look now.
10 December 2014 at 11:57 pm #136757I am amazed at the hypocrisy. Whelan is being defended on here for making stupid, ill conceived, insulting and dated comments when trying to make light of the pretty untasteful texts Mackay sent yet, when it’s thrown back at them in a very tongue-in-cheek way those same people scream, out of order.
Yes Sammy, I was one of those standing up for Mr Whelan for his unfortunate mutterings which have been seen by most of the country as the utterings of an oldman who should have known better but were never meant to insult nor be offensive.
However, if you think that the headline in that blog was meant as ‘tongue-in-cheek’ then you have clearly missed the tasteless intent meant by his words. There was never any need to fan the flames of what was already a well trodden and discussed episode.
I, am not the hypocrite here, nor am I the ‘hey look at me’ type (as displayed by that beurk and wannabe writer, but I do know what I’m talking about and don’t curry favour by changing what I say to please an audience.
All the best from: Lord Chief Knobhead of the Darby and Joan Club
PS: never seen you in there but I wager we of the same age (or thereabouts)[/quote]
Poor old duffer’s getting confused now Sammy, you’re not having the credit for the Darby and Joan Club line. Perhaps Care Home would have been more apt for our confused, old member. He does seem awfully confused.[/quote]
The gift that just keeps giving.
I never said nor sttibuted that line to Sammy – tis you who said it for all to see. I was right about the ‘hey look at me’, ‘it were me that wrote that funny’, ‘please like me’ condition that you so surely suffer from.
Oh dear! Now please stop, it is very cold out there, and I can no longer laugh with cracked lips.[/quote]
Cracked is very apt. I can’t explain how silly you are making yourself look now.[/quote]
I’ve edited it for accuracy of your competency levels.
You’re welcome.
11 December 2014 at 12:20 am #136759I am amazed at the hypocrisy. Whelan is being defended on here for making stupid, ill conceived, insulting and dated comments when trying to make light of the pretty untasteful texts Mackay sent yet, when it’s thrown back at them in a very tongue-in-cheek way those same people scream, out of order.
Yes Sammy, I was one of those standing up for Mr Whelan for his unfortunate mutterings which have been seen by most of the country as the utterings of an oldman who should have known better but were never meant to insult nor be offensive.
However, if you think that the headline in that blog was meant as ‘tongue-in-cheek’ then you have clearly missed the tasteless intent meant by his words. There was never any need to fan the flames of what was already a well trodden and discussed episode.
I, am not the hypocrite here, nor am I the ‘hey look at me’ type (as displayed by that beurk and wannabe writer, but I do know what I’m talking about and don’t curry favour by changing what I say to please an audience.
All the best from: Lord Chief Knobhead of the Darby and Joan Club
PS: never seen you in there but I wager we of the same age (or thereabouts)[/quote]
Poor old duffer’s getting confused now Sammy, you’re not having the credit for the Darby and Joan Club line. Perhaps Care Home would have been more apt for our confused, old member. He does seem awfully confused.[/quote]
The gift that just keeps giving.
I never said nor sttibuted that line to Sammy – tis you who said it for all to see. I was right about the ‘hey look at me’, ‘it were me that wrote that funny’, ‘please like me’ condition that you so surely suffer from.
Oh dear! Now please stop, it is very cold out there, and I can no longer laugh with cracked lips.[/quote]
Cracked is very apt. I can’t explain how silly you are making yourself look now.[/quote]
I’ve edited it for accuracy of your competency levels.
You’re welcome.[/quote]
What colour is the sky on your planet?
11 December 2014 at 1:59 am #136761What colour is the sky on your planet?Oh dear!
11 December 2014 at 2:01 am #136762I often think “oh dear” when you post and get constantly shown up only to argue the point over and phookin over again :S
11 December 2014 at 2:34 am #136763I often think “oh dear” when you post and get constantly shown up only to argue the point over and phookin over again :Sand then there were three.
I’m not even going to try and explain it to you. :S
11 December 2014 at 2:42 am #136764I just find you boring and tedious that’s all maybe a bit stubborn I tend to notice these things
11 December 2014 at 3:51 am #136765I just find you boring and tedious that’s all maybe a bit stubborn I tend to notice these thingsYou know, you might just want to try that thought process when reading some of Griffs input. You’ll be surprised at the outcome. It cuts both ways you know, and I’m not the one who goes out of their way just to insult other board members.
Just a thought like.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › Tis is out of order !