› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › who is worst ever latics manager since joining the
- This topic has 42 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by Hindley blue.
-
AuthorPosts
-
30 October 2011 at 1:22 am #72936I will be waving my willy if we beat Fulham. B)
no offence yosser, but in some respects i’m glad we lost now :cheer:
31 October 2011 at 2:27 pm #73151well one more loss, i.e. wolves sunday and that should be it for bob, he has to walk then or be pushed.There have been many managers sacked at latics and with a lot better results than this years. bye bye bobby thanks for the memories.
31 October 2011 at 2:54 pm #73157It does make you wonder what Chairman Dave will let go before he does sack him…
31 October 2011 at 3:05 pm #73159Kenny Swain BTW is the current England U16 Manager so can’t be that bad ;) (thankfully that era is before my time)The role of England U-16 “manager” is in fact a coaching role. He doesn’t have to manage players on a day-to-day basis. He was, and obviously still is, a fine coach. It’s the managerial side he was poor at.
Eric Black, for example, is a very good coach – it doesn’t mean he would be a good manager.
31 October 2011 at 5:47 pm #73169In many ways there are similarities between Martinez and Swain in that they both have to manage clubs with very poor crowds and very little available money for the level they are playing at. With a restricted wage bill and small transfer pot,Kenny was restricted to unproven cast offs from Crewe and old past it pals such as Mick Kennedy & Brendan Ormsby. Martinez has to rely on the lowest gates in the division a small wage bill, sell before you can buy & rely on untried foreigners & old pals such as Gomez & Scotland.
Of course many of us have since done our City & Guilds in football finances.As others have said, we get poor crowds,Whelan doesn’t want to invest any more & nor does anyone else. Its not rocket science to see both then & now that poor crowds/income & lack of investments = weaker squad & poor results at any level of football.
Both Swain & Martinez are / where relatively inexperienced at the level they operate at but also work ( ed ) under the kind of financial restrictions that are / were likely to prevent any sort of sustained challenge up the table
The main difference is there were 1500 Latics fans then many of whom voiced their disapproval at the time but you could argue had earned their right to as they had paid their money through the turnstiles. If we’d got dicked 3-0 at Colchester or Scunthorpe you wouldn’t have an army of bedwetters..er bedroom dwellers and pub goers on here dissecting the tactics minutes after or even during the game who have watched it on a live feed.
I suppose if it came down to a vote Martinez would romp it over Swain seeing as 90% of the 15000 who watch us now were nowhere to be seen when Kenny Swain was manager and therefore don’t have a clue how bad we were :dry:
I’d go with Deehan because he had decent financial resources compared to the other two and chose to play negative, defensive dross on so many occasions when he had the players to be more attack minded
31 October 2011 at 6:05 pm #73172I remember John Benson (RIP) came in for loads of criticism during his tenure, and how many remember that Bruce Rioch actually managed us within living memory?
For me though the worst has to be Kenny Swain. The name itself became a bye-word for poor quality.
31 October 2011 at 7:01 pm #73175Bobby has money to spend (albeit peanuts compared to others in the division) but Kenny Swain quite literally had none to spend.
IMO what counts against Swain is not the god awful football we had to watch (a 2-2 draw away at Leek in the cup springs to mind after having led 2-0 with about 5 minutes to go) coz he took over a squad that had somet like 8 players on the first day of training (I remember a photo in the Observer with the whole squad in it) & couldn’t spend a bean but its the fact that Graham Barrow got the same squad playing much better almost instantly & that shows that his managerial skills probably weren’t up to scratchI also believe that a different manager (& I’m talking about ones who are available at present) could get the current squad playing much better than Bobby seems to be able to – although that theory will have to be hypothetical until Bobby does go. And I don’t foresee that happening any time soon
31 October 2011 at 10:43 pm #73184Im with Tyldesley on this one, statistically Deehan wasnt the worst but surely the most hateful.Straight out of the David Speedie i could start a fight in a phonebox school for head-the-balls.Numerous stories around of players coming to blows with this mon especially Colin Greenhall.Saw him a few years after he left us at a Wolves v Norwich game and i nearly got clod out for venting my spleen at the horrible get.Disliked by many was a real piece of work.
.
31 October 2011 at 11:12 pm #73186I was stewarding in the tunnel at Springfield, and in one match one of my colleagues said, fairly quietly, “Oh come on, Rogers”. At the time Deehan was under some, shall we say, pressure.
Deehan turned to us, and started a foul-mouthed rant how we needed to get behind the team, we were there for the club (technically incorrect, as stewards we were supposed to treat everyone equally) and so on and so forth.
When he had finished my colleague said “we’ll be here longer than you”.
He was right. :)
1 November 2011 at 1:00 pm #73221After the “6 at the back” Walsall game me & some friends got talking to David Lee in the Walsall clubhouse after the game & you got the distinct impression that Deehan wasn’t well liked then too.
When we were driving home we noticed the club coach ahead on the motorway, hastily scrawled “Deehan Out” on mine & my mates t-shirt & hung out of the car sunroof as we drove past.
Seems a bit childish now like but David Lee appreciated the humour at the time. From what i could see as the wind blasted me in the face, John Deehan was less impressed.On useless managers, wasn’t watching Latics during his first spell in charge but Bryan Hamilton took some beating when he returned to the club & I’m sure you’d have had a queue of volunteers ready to dish that out too
9 November 2011 at 5:56 am #73962well here we are still pointless since I started this topic, come on you people who support bob get real, we prob could only realisticly win one or two out of next 9 games the way we are going now, good play doesnt win games its the defence and strikers ability to do their job that does and it doesnt look like turning the corner any time now. it is time for bob to bob off now. thanks for the stress bob take a break bye bye!!
9 November 2011 at 5:38 pm #73978And what happens if Bob goes tom?
Who do we get in?
What changes do they make?
Enlighten me…
9 November 2011 at 8:34 pm #74000And what happens if Bob goes tom?Who do we get in?
What changes do they make?
Enlighten me…
IMO we have not got the worst squad in the league so the problem must be the manager. Anyone who came in would do a better job than this clown, may be play 2 strikers in a 4-4-2 just try something new cause they couldn’t do worse.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Forums › Latics Crazy Forum › who is worst ever latics manager since joining the