Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Shaun Maloney is going NOWHERE .., deservedly and quite rightly so ..along with Leam , he has taken on a very unenviable task ..money .. no way .. Celtic, Villa , us in the Prem , Belgium ! Probably wouldn’t have to lift a finger again .. but . BUT , he has chosen to try his hand at management .. to try and rebuild a disastrous time in our Clubs history .can’t imagine he gets 35/40 hours sleep a week ! As per my thread , I really do believe there is an agenda against us .. you can’t beat 12 when one has a whistle .. recorded mail off to Prick Parry this week ..35 brown envelopes . annotated with our remaining fixtures on each one ..
How many times !! you can’t play 1O v 12 and one with a whistle ..NO NO NO . a NON penalty .. non bookings of Stevenage players ..are you ‘ blind ‘ .. can’t blame Maloney for the agenda .. Whelan said there’s too much money in football ,,Prick Parry was caught out . we challenged the EFL in Arbitration ..
Said it before and i ll say it AGAIN ,, there is an agenda, conspiracy against us ..that referee was a total and utter TWAT… and loved being so ..
The only two ways to stitch them up are 1 ) recording something verbally .. 2 ) hacking their [ FA/EFL ] systems .. I’ve not got a clue how to do it.. but somebody somewhwere will ..!
although you’ll never see something that says .. ‘ stitch WAFC up ‘Been suggested that it was the FA’s call .. EFL delivered the decision. ! They wouldn’t accept a Barnsley video because they could say it had been ‘ doctored ‘ .. ? but why would a Barnsley fan give credence to our claim ? We know it was a great miscarriage .. clean attempt to [ as he did ] play the ball/ref totally unsighted ..clear agenda , conspiracy , vendetta ..QED ..imagine we had needed a point from that for whatever reason ?
Disgraceful ..! and even worse, it exonerates the 2 incompetents .. ref /linesman . totally inexcusable and indefensible decision ..
£7.20 .. a gallon of petrol .. £50 a gallon of Guinness , Madri , Peroni etc . do the maths ..all sponsored by ‘drink aware ‘ ..we are being taken as fools .. which , of course , we are
Not a question of being mandatory .. affordability ! 
Surely the moot point is determined by the words ‘ tackle [ ed ] ‘/foul ‘ a legitimate tackle shouldn’t be punished , he played the ball .. nothing doing !It also wasn’t a tackle as he was ahead of Cole and got to the ball first ..! Therefore Cole wasn’t through on goal.. !
Excellent that .. also .. where is the Ref ????? Charlies foot is this side of a line in the turf .. whereas Cole foot appears to be on/the other side of that line . and most of Coles foot which is fully on the grass is almost completely visible .. if that doesn’t get rescinded we all might as well sack the appeals process
Definite conspiracy against us .. happening too often .. how to prove it ?? Just seen the video .. referee TOTALLY unsighted .. Hughes gets the ball . then that TWAT .. follows his fathers rulebook ..no use to us that it will get overturned .. O points .. that CUNT gets to referee AGAIN .. !!
he said something along the lines of ..’ I want to play for a really ” big Club ” , with much bigger crowds …
