- This topic has 41 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Ffs why?? Look what happened last week when Gary realised his mistake and amended things, so why back to the formation that took us to two nil down last week??? How do these things work??
Ffs why?? Look what happened last week when Gary realised his mistake and amended things, so why back to the formation that took us to two nil down last week??? How do these things work??Obstinance maybe?
So is that still 2 up front ?..Cant believe we cannot put our noses in front early on away from home.Chasing again ,back to 2-2 now 3-2 down .Why can’t we start more positive?
Not going into a knee-jerk reaction about the game, but to single Barnett out is quite unfair, Just purely on some of the goals we have conceded away from home, McCann needs to take a look at himself, gave the ball away at Gillingham for their 1st, did the same for Vale’s first today and if I wasn’t mistaken (as I was at the other end of the ground to our fans), was dispossessed for the build up which ultimately led to their winner.
Oi!! Folks!! From what I heard Barnett had little choice. Either do what he did or let a certain goal happen. Morally the former is wrong … but it happens. He’s ok. What’s more when he screws up he makes amends pretty quickly ….. remember his goal of the season last week after having scored another good goal at the wrong end. Good lad!
BTW look at this bit of ‘rubbish’ I’ve found.
He took one for the team and those that were there gave him a standing ovation as he went offAbsolutely correct. He did the one thing that saved a certain goal.
I’m a great believer in letting one on ones go as the amount of times the attacker misses is far more than they score.
In the heat of the battle though that’s a split decision, in the end we lost and have lost a man. Some would argue that’s a good thing due to who it is, someone quite rightly points out he’s more prolific in open player than others.
I’m a great believer in letting one on ones go as the amount of times the attacker misses is far more than they score.In the heat of the battle though that’s a split decision, in the end we lost and have lost a man. Some would argue that’s a good thing due to who it is, someone quite rightly points out he’s more prolific in open player than others.
Are you for real?? So Barnett should have pulled out of the tackle and let the guy through on goal, cos the odds say he would have missed.? :S
Please take a break from this board and get a grip, you are talking absolute shyte!!From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
