- This topic has 57 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Kiernan … Keep reading he’s going to be a good one.. Love to know exactly what they base that opinion on?Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Kiernan … Keep reading he’s going to be a good one.. Love to know exactly what they base that opinion on?Kiernan is a liability, full stop! :S
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?Don’t be saying that, he who is always right will be telling you are talking crap !
I only wish that the midfielders that Rosler has signed, Huws, Cowie, Kist and four million quid Forshaw were as bad a Espinoza.
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Kiernan … Keep reading he’s going to be a good one.. Love to know exactly what they base that opinion on?Espinoza played very well today and took his goal well, too. Get you rose tinted specs off though, he dropped a few bollocks as well. ;)
Fortune was MOM by a street in my opinion. Forshaw decent. Nothing much to say about any of the others.
I must be seeing something different than some, thought Cowie was our MOM, closely followed by Fortune.
Forshaw just needs some consistency, so does Tavs. The central defenders were both woeful and should not see any further first team action for a while, one forced due to 3 match ban, the other is a no brainer.
Not sure who should play alongside Ramis on Tuesday, but would put Maloney in there before Kiernan. :woohoo:From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Don’t be saying that, he who is always right will be telling you are talking crap !
I only wish that the midfielders that Rosler has signed, Huws, Cowie, Kist and four million quid Forshaw were as bad a Espinoza.[/quote]
Obsessed!
Why don’t you go back on Facebook and starting shouting the odds at people who clearly don’t even know you?
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Kiernan … Keep reading he’s going to be a good one.. Love to know exactly what they base that opinion on?Espinoza played very well today and took his goal well, too. Get you rose tinted specs off though, he dropped a few bollocks as well. ;)
Fortune was MOM by a street in my opinion. Forshaw decent. Nothing much to say about any of the others.[/quote]
You must mean that sublime “bollock” of a pass that Maloney scored from, whenever Espinoza make a mistake or gives the ball away he chases it down keeps going until he either wins it back or the pressure he creates allows someone else to do so, I wish golden boy McMananan did the same, he just stands there with his hands on his hips moaning while Roger and others clear his mess up.
I must be seeing something different than some, thought Cowie was our MOM, closely followed by Fortune.Forshaw just needs some consistency, so does Tavs. The central defenders were both woeful and should not see any further first team action for a while, one forced due to 3 match ban, the other is a no brainer.
Not sure who should play alongside Ramis on Tuesday, but would put Maloney in there before Kiernan. :woohoo:I think you are. Fortune yes, but please explain why you thought Cowie was MOM today.
To stand out in our current midfield can’t be all that difficult and to single him out would be unfair. I mean, if Roger is turning out to be our best mid-field player then it doesn’t say much about the rest.And another thing, isn’t it only a one match ban for a professional foul?
Still only a point though…but it was a heck of a lot more entertaining than Millwall and Brentford games.
Finally scored a goal in open play at home…first for 287 minutes :ohmy:
I had a bet on with a mate that Mclean wouldn’t start; he didn’t believe me that Herr Swappenchange wouldn’t start him!!
Fortune’s best game in a while. Will he get a run in the side though? Don’t hold your breath…Delort to start at Brighton no doubt.
In summary, better performance, but we need wins and fast.
I must be seeing something different than some, thought Cowie was our MOM, closely followed by Fortune.Forshaw just needs some consistency, so does Tavs. The central defenders were both woeful and should not see any further first team action for a while, one forced due to 3 match ban, the other is a no brainer.
Not sure who should play alongside Ramis on Tuesday, but would put Maloney in there before Kiernan. :woohoo:Not seen Cowie have a bad game yet John, but the brains trust on here decided some time ago he was shite.
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Kiernan … Keep reading he’s going to be a good one.. Love to know exactly what they base that opinion on?Espinoza played very well today and took his goal well, too. Get you rose tinted specs off though, he dropped a few bollocks as well. ;)
Fortune was MOM by a street in my opinion. Forshaw decent. Nothing much to say about any of the others.[/quote]
You must mean that sublime “bollock” of a pass that Maloney scored from, whenever Espinoza make a mistake or gives the ball away he chases it down keeps going until he either wins it back or the pressure he creates allows someone else to do so, I wish golden boy McMananan did the same, he just stands there with his hands on his hips moaning while Roger and others clear his mess up.[/quote]
McManaman will never be midfiled player as long as he has a hole in his arse so there’s no comparison. Quite why Rosler keeps playing him as one is a completely mystery. Every tackle he makes is a potential red card.
I had a bet on with a mate that Mclean wouldn’t start; he didn’t believe me that Herr Swappenchange wouldn’t start him!!Well, he can’t win then, can he? He didn’t change the team from last week, he even only changed one sub.
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Don’t be saying that, he who is always right will be telling you are talking crap !
I only wish that the midfielders that Rosler has signed, Huws, Cowie, Kist and four million quid Forshaw were as bad a Espinoza.[/quote]
Obsessed!
Why don’t you go back on Facebook and starting shouting the odds at people who clearly don’t even know you?[/quote]
Another of you lies, how do you know my post was aimed at you, now what were the words to that Carly Simon song – oh I remember ‘you’re so vain I bet you think this song is about you’
Belting game Imo anyone think callum just over did the diving bit as it clearly was and after Kiernan swung an (just for philyis) lazy leg at a ball which went through to Rodders Barnett had to make the challenge and from where I was sat defo penalty
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Kiernan … Keep reading he’s going to be a good one.. Love to know exactly what they base that opinion on?Espinoza played very well today and took his goal well, too. Get you rose tinted specs off though, he dropped a few bollocks as well. ;)
Fortune was MOM by a street in my opinion. Forshaw decent. Nothing much to say about any of the others.[/quote]
You must mean that sublime “bollock” of a pass that Maloney scored from, whenever Espinoza make a mistake or gives the ball away he chases it down keeps going until he either wins it back or the pressure he creates allows someone else to do so, I wish golden boy McMananan did the same, he just stands there with his hands on his hips moaning while Roger and others clear his mess up.[/quote]
Agree with you about McManaman, to a point.
And no, of course, I wasn’t on about THAT pass. If you read my post, I said he had a good game. My post contains all I wanted to say on the subject. And I am off to have a life now, so I really cannot be arsed to sit here reading and responding to your shite all night. Go and find somebody you don’t know on twitter or facebook to pester and offend.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
