BOB ON THE MOON

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,307 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: under 2.5 goals #37247

    like the article says its best to keep your powder dry until the knock out stage.7/8 have been under 2.5 so far. I jump on-board the world cup under 2.5 goals gravy train and it derails :roll:

    in reply to: under 2.5 goals #37243

    interesting article on under 2.5 goals

    http://selectabet.net/2010/06/07/master … world-cup/

    in reply to: under 2.5 goals #37242
    Sie sind sicherlich! ha ha ha

    Sie Deutsch liebevolle Ihre Möse ein Verräter an Ihrem Land :roll:

    in reply to: under 2.5 goals #37241

    the load giveth and the lord taketh away :)
    I bet the next game is under 2.5. will I bet on it well that is a different matter :roll:

    in reply to: under 2.5 goals #37236

    :roll: I have never been lucky with football betting. 1 more goal and that’s that :(

    in reply to: under 2.5 goals #37235

    i am on it fingers crossed and all that jazz :)

    in reply to: 2 latics goalkeepers in the same world cup match #37227

    the commentator said that kingson had been released by Wigan athletic. so none of them were are players as clowns loan spell had ended. unless bob as signed him or he is on loan again and I missed that bad news :shock:

    in reply to: Gutted!!.. #37223

    I did a bet this afternoon on the nags on 3 horses. 3x 25p ew doubles and 25p ew treble. 1st 2 won , Frances Stuart i got 10/1, sir gerry 17/2. the last horse was called excellent day. it would have been a excellent day if it won. I would have picked up nearly 400 dabs. it came 7th :lol: . still I got 26.47 profit for 2 bets that cost 2 dabs so its better then a poke in the eye. :)

    in reply to: iphones and apps #37210

    i know of a few people who work there. a lad in my year at school damien willoughsy and some ones dad 2nd name lumb. though there is wymott next door so it might be that one.

    in reply to: Will England be the first winners in WC 2010? #37193

    most of the damage was done on the flag thread James . it did not make for good reading. your mate pretending to be you said that you wanted to give griff a bj . :shock:

    [/quote]

    Has it all been deleted and could you PM me and tell me what it said?.. Banjo just because you have something against me doesn’t mean that I posted it. I quite obviously didn’t, and the mate that did it is Parakeet on here!… You can even ask the admin as the IP adress will be the same as that of his when he posts.[/qu

    I can not remember what it said word for word but it was titled willys and said that you like them and you wanted griffs in your mouth. I knew it was not you well I hope it wasn’t but others on here are going to get a lot of mileage out of it. my advice is you should never log on to mates computers with pass words etc. because they might have a key logger installed?

    in reply to: Will England be the first winners in WC 2010? #37188
    He knows, he posted it.

    Never mind James, you’re ‘out’ now anyway.

    :lol: there is going to be a lot of mileage from this :)

    in reply to: Will England be the first winners in WC 2010? #37186

    most of the damage was done on the flag thread James . it did not make for good reading. your mate pretending to be you said that you wanted to give griff a bj . :shock:

    in reply to: Englands group #37179
    We’ve played one game and that’s against the strongest opponents in the, albeit, weakest group. We drew and our entire tournament and chances have fallen apart – not quite, I’d say.

    There have been many slow starters who have gone on to great things in the World Cup. We drew with ROI, a comparable fixture to USA in 1990, and went on to get cruelly knocked out in the semis.

    We might not get that far this time, who knows, but I wouldn’t hang too much on yesterday’s game, where I thought we played quite well anyway against very tidy opposition.

    It’s amazing that the same people that can somehow can find positives in the most bleak WAFC results and performances have already thrown in the towel with England after a half decent draw.

    I think your getting me and horc mixed up with some else as I never found positives in some of the diabolical performances last season. I think the same applies to horc as well. i am been realistic and I think the quarter finals is are mark. the semi’s would be great. I want England to do well but there is no way we are going to win it. I hope I am wrong but I don’t think I am :)

    in reply to: Englands group #37152
    All the groups in the World Cup have 1 good side, 1 half decent side and two no hopers.
    Can somebody tell me why Englands group has 4 no hopers?

    I think I am old enough and wise enough not to fall for the spin and clichés. Spirit of 66 blah blah blah and all the other stuff that is repeated in every major tournament England are in. the sheeple swallow it hook line and sinker every time. the reality is we are not good enough and as soon as we come up against a fancied team in the knock out stages we will get knocked out like we have every single time since 1970 :roll:

    in reply to: Will England be the first winners in WC 2010? #37151
    I think James should also be ashamed about his particularly unsavoury post last night, which was unsurprisingly removed by admin.
    Griff, to whom the post was directed, would have had a field-day.

    I don’t think it was him who posted that?. he as had his account hacked. i think he logged on via some else’s computer and it had a key logger installed or he was silly enough to not click on no when it says do you want this computer to remember password?

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 1,307 total)