- This topic has 53 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Never once looked fit or interested while he’s been here.
That’s a bit unfair egg, did you see him put his body on the line diving head long for the first goal at Bury? That forced own goal got us back in the game and allowed us to eventually secure a good away point.
What I’ve seen when he plays, is someone who has been injured for a long period and is desperately trying to impress in the short cameos he has been given. He is “over trying” in my opinion. However, I can see how fans feel that he he doesn’t give a shyte, the way he turns up on match days with his tracky on laughing and joking with the players, I think its just he’s character.
I suppose I’m on the fence with the whole Holt situation, would not complain if he stays and wouldn’t be too upset if he left.
From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!Holt is just another in a long list of wasted Latics strikers. At least now we are starting to see midfield players getting up there to support the striker. Shame he wasn’t up there to support Grigg today. Find this crazy with Grigg away on holiday duty and Coulthirst gone that Holt has been allowed to play at an higher level. Couldn’t this just have been left until after the bloody Rochdale game.
Never once looked fit or interested while he’s been here.
That’s a bit unfair egg, did you see him put his body on the line diving head long for the first goal at Bury? That forced own goal got us back in the game and allowed us to eventually secure a good away point.
What I’ve seen when he plays, is someone who has been injured for a long period and is desperately trying to impress in the short cameos he has been given. He is “over trying” in my opinion. However, I can see how fans feel that he he doesn’t give a shyte, the way he turns up on match days with his tracky on laughing and joking with the players, I think its just he’s character.
I suppose I’m on the fence with the whole Holt situation, would not complain if he stays and wouldn’t be too upset if he left.[/quote]
Dear me JR, u have just picked out Holts one and only decent effort for WAFC and still sit on the fence about him???
A Norwich fan laughed at me when we bought him, saying he was sh ! te and were welcome to him… A bad player bought by a bad manager!Never once looked fit or interested while he’s been here.
That’s a bit unfair egg, did you see him put his body on the line diving head long for the first goal at Bury? That forced own goal got us back in the game and allowed us to eventually secure a good away point.
What I’ve seen when he plays, is someone who has been injured for a long period and is desperately trying to impress in the short cameos he has been given. He is “over trying” in my opinion. However, I can see how fans feel that he he doesn’t give a shyte, the way he turns up on match days with his tracky on laughing and joking with the players, I think its just he’s character.
I suppose I’m on the fence with the whole Holt situation, would not complain if he stays and wouldn’t be too upset if he left.[/quote]
Dear me JR, u have just picked out Holts one and only decent effort for WAFC and still sit on the fence about him???
A Norwich fan laughed at me when we bought him, saying he was sh ! te and were welcome to him… A bad player bought by a bad manager![/quote]When are you going to realise that players and managers are often seen has crap by fans, AFTER they have left your club. I’ve done it myself, is it not just a bit of that going on with the Norwich fans?
He had some fantastic times at Norwich, scoring 68 goals in 154 games. That doesn’t warrant being called shyte, especially when a lot of those goals were score in the prem.
Grant Holt has played just 17 times for Wigan scoring 3 goals, how can you possibly come to a conclusion that he is a shyte player. He has been shyte at keeping injury free whilst he has been with us, that conclusion can definitely be made.From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!Never once looked fit or interested while he’s been here.
That’s a bit unfair egg, did you see him put his body on the line diving head long for the first goal at Bury? That forced own goal got us back in the game and allowed us to eventually secure a good away point.
What I’ve seen when he plays, is someone who has been injured for a long period and is desperately trying to impress in the short cameos he has been given. He is “over trying” in my opinion. However, I can see how fans feel that he he doesn’t give a shyte, the way he turns up on match days with his tracky on laughing and joking with the players, I think its just he’s character.
I suppose I’m on the fence with the whole Holt situation, would not complain if he stays and wouldn’t be too upset if he left.[/quote]
Dear me JR, u have just picked out Holts one and only decent effort for WAFC and still sit on the fence about him???
A Norwich fan laughed at me when we bought him, saying he was sh ! te and were welcome to him… A bad player bought by a bad manager![/quote]When are you going to realise that players and managers are often seen has crap by fans, AFTER they have left your club. I’ve done it myself, is it not just a bit of that going on with the Norwich fans?
He had some fantastic times at Norwich, scoring 68 goals in 154 games. That doesn’t warrant being called shyte, especially when a lot of those goals were score in the prem.
Grant Holt has played just 17 times for Wigan scoring 3 goals, how can you possibly come to a conclusion that he is a shyte player. He has been shyte at keeping injury free whilst he has been with us, that conclusion can definitely be made.[/quote]So you can’t allow people to come to that conclusion after 17 appearances by Holt but you are allowed to about every other player that’s left us Tavernier, Waghorn, Delort etc. Players who were actually trying? Wow!!!
Holt was a lump when we got him and hasn’t give a shite for us.Confused.com
Never once looked fit or interested while he’s been here.
That’s a bit unfair egg, did you see him put his body on the line diving head long for the first goal at Bury? That forced own goal got us back in the game and allowed us to eventually secure a good away point.
What I’ve seen when he plays, is someone who has been injured for a long period and is desperately trying to impress in the short cameos he has been given. He is “over trying” in my opinion. However, I can see how fans feel that he he doesn’t give a shyte, the way he turns up on match days with his tracky on laughing and joking with the players, I think its just he’s character.
I suppose I’m on the fence with the whole Holt situation, would not complain if he stays and wouldn’t be too upset if he left.[/quote]
Dear me JR, u have just picked out Holts one and only decent effort for WAFC and still sit on the fence about him???
A Norwich fan laughed at me when we bought him, saying he was sh ! te and were welcome to him… A bad player bought by a bad manager![/quote]When are you going to realise that players and managers are often seen has crap by fans, AFTER they have left your club. I’ve done it myself, is it not just a bit of that going on with the Norwich fans?
He had some fantastic times at Norwich, scoring 68 goals in 154 games. That doesn’t warrant being called shyte, especially when a lot of those goals were score in the prem.
Grant Holt has played just 17 times for Wigan scoring 3 goals, how can you possibly come to a conclusion that he is a shyte player. He has been shyte at keeping injury free whilst he has been with us, that conclusion can definitely be made.[/quote]So you can’t allow people to come to that conclusion after 17 appearances by Holt but you are allowed to about every other player that’s left us Tavernier, Waghorn, Delort etc. Players who were actually trying? Wow!!!
Holt was a lump when we got him and hasn’t give a shite for us.Confused.com[/quote]
Yer there again jumping in big gob!
Tavernier and Waghorn were not considered to be good enough to play week in week out, despite being available for selection.
Holt has been injured for most of his time with us. Can you see the suckle difference brorth brain.From Matlock to ManU
What a journey!Never once looked fit or interested while he’s been here.
That’s a bit unfair egg, did you see him put his body on the line diving head long for the first goal at Bury? That forced own goal got us back in the game and allowed us to eventually secure a good away point.
What I’ve seen when he plays, is someone who has been injured for a long period and is desperately trying to impress in the short cameos he has been given. He is “over trying” in my opinion. However, I can see how fans feel that he he doesn’t give a shyte, the way he turns up on match days with his tracky on laughing and joking with the players, I think its just he’s character.
I suppose I’m on the fence with the whole Holt situation, would not complain if he stays and wouldn’t be too upset if he left.[/quote]
Dear me JR, u have just picked out Holts one and only decent effort for WAFC and still sit on the fence about him???
A Norwich fan laughed at me when we bought him, saying he was sh ! te and were welcome to him… A bad player bought by a bad manager![/quote]When are you going to realise that players and managers are often seen has crap by fans, AFTER they have left your club. I’ve done it myself, is it not just a bit of that going on with the Norwich fans?
He had some fantastic times at Norwich, scoring 68 goals in 154 games. That doesn’t warrant being called shyte, especially when a lot of those goals were score in the prem.
Grant Holt has played just 17 times for Wigan scoring 3 goals, how can you possibly come to a conclusion that he is a shyte player. He has been shyte at keeping injury free whilst he has been with us, that conclusion can definitely be made.[/quote]I’m basing my comments on how he has performed for Wigan, and that is most definitely, POOR… When he first signed he was carrying too much wood, and that showed in his performances (when he was fit, ish). He’s done nawt for us, jack ****.
Now I’ve had a look at Wiki also, and most of his goals for Norwich were scored in League 1 & the Championship, not the Prem. However, his record in the prem would make him our best ever scorer, when we were there!
We bought him at the wrong end of his career JR, that is my point. No doubt he had some ability when he was younger, but as Tez says, he’s not bothered about Wigan, just his wage packet! Surely you can see that, even through your blue tinted glasses :pinch:
Never once looked fit or interested while he’s been here.
That’s a bit unfair egg, did you see him put his body on the line diving head long for the first goal at Bury? That forced own goal got us back in the game and allowed us to eventually secure a good away point.
What I’ve seen when he plays, is someone who has been injured for a long period and is desperately trying to impress in the short cameos he has been given. He is “over trying” in my opinion. However, I can see how fans feel that he he doesn’t give a shyte, the way he turns up on match days with his tracky on laughing and joking with the players, I think its just he’s character.
I suppose I’m on the fence with the whole Holt situation, would not complain if he stays and wouldn’t be too upset if he left.[/quote]
Dear me JR, u have just picked out Holts one and only decent effort for WAFC and still sit on the fence about him???
A Norwich fan laughed at me when we bought him, saying he was sh ! te and were welcome to him… A bad player bought by a bad manager![/quote]When are you going to realise that players and managers are often seen has crap by fans, AFTER they have left your club. I’ve done it myself, is it not just a bit of that going on with the Norwich fans?
He had some fantastic times at Norwich, scoring 68 goals in 154 games. That doesn’t warrant being called shyte, especially when a lot of those goals were score in the prem.
Grant Holt has played just 17 times for Wigan scoring 3 goals, how can you possibly come to a conclusion that he is a shyte player. He has been shyte at keeping injury free whilst he has been with us, that conclusion can definitely be made.[/quote]So you can’t allow people to come to that conclusion after 17 appearances by Holt but you are allowed to about every other player that’s left us Tavernier, Waghorn, Delort etc. Players who were actually trying? Wow!!!
Holt was a lump when we got him and hasn’t give a shite for us.Confused.com[/quote]
Yer there again jumping in big gob!
Tavernier and Waghorn were not considered to be good enough to play week in week out, despite being available for selection.
Holt has been injured for most of his time with us. Can you see the suckle difference brorth brain.[/quote]Tut tut calling people names, more double standards from you. Suckle difference? Brorth brain? Haha
17 games is 17 games holt been loaned out more times than soft mick on yeah he’s wanted alreet lol
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
