Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The benefit of the doubt must apply to Boselli in my opinion. As for formations, they are so ambiguous the best of times its not worth discussing them any more ! Early on last season most posters on here were under the impression that RM favoured the 4-5-1 formation and I have to admit that that is the impression I was under but all that is in the past now and so hows about looking forward to the new season and see what that brings ! B)
I agree….bring on the glorious 18th.
However, here is a very interesting read on positional play:
Another take on the whole thing
B)
Two days and thats the best you can come up with?Are you taking the Micky?
Martinez I am sure has bigger fish to fry than the positional markings on a website.
And I have better things to do than educate a crayon eating mong like you who could not even see what formation his own team was playing for over 2 years :lol:
I didn’t realise it was a time trial pal! Hey! but I guess it’s because of the speed that you can read at.
“Crayon eating mong”?…………..give me strength.
– and you wonder why no one ever takes you seriously – grow up.
The move from Preston was inevitable………and what an experience it now is (for both young and old).
goodpost
;)
I’ve just read thia:
Forest looking for players from Kuwait and the UAE
That is hilarious! I wrote a mall piece on here last December about the couple of games I saw in the UAE and how poor their players were.
Good luck, Forest!
At least they’ve not changed the clubs colours ……… yet!
Shouldn’t a team called Forest play in green shirts and brown shorts and socks? :pinch:[/quote]
……..and their star striker should be called Robin, however, his shooting will probably end up like this:
;)
He as got red hair ;) :woohoo:Well it makes it easy for us all to get our red wigs and kilts ready for our themed fancy dress this year.
;)
Well sorry to p*ss on both of your bonfires but you can take it up with Roberto the guy who makes the formations who has said clear as day we have never played with a lone striker!!!!It was a 4-3-3
Going back N’Zogbia wasnt playing as a right winger and Rodallega certainly wasnt playing as a left winger.
I’d draw you a picture but if you cant be bothered to relaise your own teams tactics why should I bother to teach you?
If indeed it was Roberto that said that then he really needs to have a word with the personnel who decide what position the players have allocated against their name on the official site.
You and your semantics…….
Oh! and what you can teach me about team formations and tactics could fit (twice) on the back on a postage stamp.
Now then should you require assistance with your drawing I see these are on offer in the arcade:
;)
I remember the stumbling block on bosellis first time around being the fact that he was unable to play in the lone striker role as has been mentioned on here previously. However, as we now play with 2 strikers with maloney just behind, i can see boselli chipping in with a few goals & di santo notching up a few himself also as di santo can be the “holding” forward laying it off to his fellow striker. I can see this working.
WE NEVER PLAYED WITH 1 STRIKER UP FRONT!!!
I dont mean to take this out on you Runcorn but I am sick to death of people saying that! its ignorant and stupid on so many levels and no matter how stubborn certain people are about it it does not change the FACT that we have always primarily played with a front line consisting of 3 forwards.
But in reply to your post Boselli will take over Sammon’s role either coming on as a late sub for Di Santo or playing alongside him if we switch to a 4-4-2 I would imagine….
If we play like we did in the latter of last season I have no doubt Boselli will score goals. If he will get the nod ahead of Di Santo I am not sure….[/quote]
Mr Salford…..
shouting will not change history. As Mr Runcorn said in his post “Bosellis first time around” we did in fact play 4-5-1 (it was not until the mid of last season did Roberto change his formation and tactics) but hey let’s not let the euphoria of the last 10 games get in the way of what happened in the past.
Roberto’s (then) tactics were the main sticking point between most of the light/dark side discussions on here.
Anyway, I’m looking forward to the man coming back and ‘fitting’ in – onwards and upwards as they say.
I remember the stumbling block on bosellis first time around being the fact that he was unable to play in the lone striker role as has been mentioned on here previously. However, as we now play with 2 strikers with maloney just behind, i can see boselli chipping in with a few goals & di santo notching up a few himself also as di santo can be the “holding” forward laying it off to his fellow striker. I can see this working.Here pull up a sandbag and sit down beside me fella…….
……..oh! and put this tin hat on. ;)
3 year deal according to sky sports! :)
Sorry to dampen the spirits with this one, but he is a very poor player at a poor team. Unless he undergoes some sort of Steve Austin therapy, if he get close to the bench before 2015 we will be in a poor way.[/quote]
Crikey Edinburgh bit harsh bit soon mate……
Roberto has plans for him and as for me…..I’m one for supporting those plans.
I was talking to this chunkie bird with big tits on King Street tonight.
“My eyes are up here”
I said as she gazed lovingly at my kebab.
I’ll bet they haven’t reprinted the fixture card to show the changes to the Chelsea and City games.Rubbish!!
Mate just text me to say he got his today GL.
…….oh and they have reprinted the fixture cards with the new dates.
Fookin EPIC Wigan
goodpost goodpost goodpost
On the train to work this morning saw a woman reading 50 Shades of Grey.
I said….”Hey! no need to lick your fingers to turn the page eh?”
“F£ck Off you dirty B@stard” she said.
Fookin pretentious these Kindle owners………
