JamesC

Oooh, Jimmy – can’t defend that comment, matey. He was/is woeful.

As for No1Fan slagging off Gomez and Scotland later on in the thread – get off the “can’t be @rsed learning about football so I’ll just slag off the same people that everyone else does” bandwagon.[/quote]

Griff griff griff. If I am completely honest, I know you are right :shock: I did post it before the 2nd goal went in (I think).. He needs to stop punching it and parrying it! Think he could be good if he stopped doing that, Like Gomes off of Tottenham is now.

Completely agree with your next post… There is a player there in Gomez.. I like him and have no idea whatsoever why!! At the moment I think he is a ‘luxury’ (If i can use that word) that we cannot afford to carry in the team just now. When we are more solid we can have a creative player like him in there..But for the moment we need players that will battle. Just hope he keeps hold of Gomez, as I think he will come good. :)

Amazing comparison that… Considering Myhill is their first choice Keeper and he didn’t even play today. Duke was in their net! :roll: [/quote]
So which ever way you spin it, both of Hulls keepers are significantly better than Stojkovic.

As a team we aren’t good enough to accomodate even a couple of players who are off the Premiership pace.

Gomez once again showed a couple of flicks but had no influence on the game, while Scotland fluffed his chance in front of goal.[/quote]

Did you even watch the game? You didn’t even know who was in the net and was comparing our keeper to one who wasn’t on the field (Myhill).
Gomez did OK overall and Scotland is still nowhere near good enough. Yet again Sinclair wasn’t given enough time to make an inpact.

Not done anything wrong this match. Actually I like him to be honest! and he clattered one of them men..wouldn’t see Kirkland doing that.[/quote]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oh my sides are aching – please stop it
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: [/quote]

Ermmm….No? Thanks for the addition…Brilliant.

Says a lot about you range of vocabulary. Buy a dictionary or a thesaurus. Heck, read a book! By the way ‘urine’ is just one of the many alternatives. I also like boys[/quote]

Urine wouldn’t have sounded as offensive. I assume by using the obvious alternative ‘urine’…that you also don’t know many more? Gimp

Because your coaches stink of pi$$?[/quote]

Double ‘s’ not double ‘dollar sign’. And you criticise fatfan’s English :lol: [/quote]

double ‘s’ would have been banned by swear filter so $$ is more appropriate. It wouldn’t have been blocked if he spelt ‘Panicking’ correctly. Putting phone away now, 2nd half.

Because your coaches stink of pi$$?

Who’s Gerard please?