Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
.40 Glock’s don’t take cartridges that have 12 bullets in them, hence my query ! I presume he meant a .40 caliber Glock because there is no such thing as a Glock 40 !
Isn’t it nice when we all get along.
I bet you have seen some sights though Phil eh?
Nudge nudge, wink wink, no what I mean??It’s all in the book ! ;)[/quote]
I don’t know how to break this to you but the book has already been done.[/quote]That was a fictional comedy whereas mine are true anecdotes ! :)
Isn’t it nice when we all get along.I bet you have seen some sights though Phil eh?
Nudge nudge, wink wink, no what I mean??It’s all in the book ! ;)
defense
While we are pulling each other up on our literary errors that is one that irks me B)[/quote]
It’s the American spell check but it isn’t a grammatical error !
http://grammarist.com/spelling/defence-defense/%5B/quote%5D
Stop using spell check then.
The sizable error you made caused me great offense and really does show the true color of your naïveté.
OR am I just being persnickety?[/quote]
No, you are being a tit ! :cheer:
I think the stewards, especially the fire steward, should be praised for their heroics in the way they handled the smoke bomb incident in the first half. I’d like to know how many other clubs would have had the foresight to ensure a bucket of sand was on hand to deal with such a potentially life threatening incident.I sincerely hope that you wrote this with tongue in cheek and a wry smile on your face ! :)
defense
While we are pulling each other up on our literary errors that is one that irks me B)[/quote]
It’s the American spell check but it isn’t a grammatical error !
How about “Confessions of a window licker” or “£50 to clean my windows, he must of seen me coming” or ” Phillip Moss – It isn’t just a spot I am missing”It’s ‘must have’ not ‘must of’ ! That common mistake irks me ! ;)
On average we have conceded just under 69 goals a season during RM’s tenure, now surely that is cause for concern as regards to his defensive strategies. It really is that simple ! The chances as many say are that we would eventually go down, there was never going to be any big money bandied about and we were never going to attract players of a certain standard but to keep making the same defensive mistakes over and over again was always going to catch up with us eventually. The Spurs and Swansea errors really did drive it home how inept our defense really is ! I just hope that whoever is our manager next season they address a glaringly obvious problem !
You know what Phil I think you have just solved the problem.
We should obviously as you pointed out appoint someone who can address the problem of our defence this season.
Does anyone know any miracle makers or witch doctors who are available?
Alcaraz was the key loss for us this season without that injury our form with him in the side shows we would of been in a far better position.[/quote]
The stats are over 4 seasons ! 69 goals on average !! Problem or not ?[/quote]
As usual plenty of criticism and no answers.
Who is your miracle maker of choice that can provide a defence worthy of competing with some of the top attacking footballers in the world at a fraction of cost?[/quote]
Not criticizing at all, I am merely stating a fact that there is an obvious problem with the workings of our defense ! As for a solution, I would take a long hard look at what the defense coach is up to ! :huh:
There is winding folk up and there is defamation of character and for you to say that I have verbally abused players when I have not is tantamount to the latter in my book !
Jesus Christ not you too.
Don’t start plugging it on here nobody wants to read a book on cleaning windows…[/quote]
It’s called ” The Ups And downs Of A Window Cleaner ” ! ;)
On average we have conceded just under 69 goals a season during RM’s tenure, now surely that is cause for concern as regards to his defensive strategies. It really is that simple ! The chances as many say are that we would eventually go down, there was never going to be any big money bandied about and we were never going to attract players of a certain standard but to keep making the same defensive mistakes over and over again was always going to catch up with us eventually. The Spurs and Swansea errors really did drive it home how inept our defense really is ! I just hope that whoever is our manager next season they address a glaringly obvious problem !
You know what Phil I think you have just solved the problem.
We should obviously as you pointed out appoint someone who can address the problem of our defence this season.
Does anyone know any miracle makers or witch doctors who are available?
Alcaraz was the key loss for us this season without that injury our form with him in the side shows we would of been in a far better position.[/quote]
The stats are over 4 seasons ! 69 goals on average !! Problem or not ?
So Jason Scotland was your favourite player
PS for a self proclaimed wind-up merchant you are easily wound up Fil
Jason Scotland was rubbish for us but I have never shouted anything at him during a match. There is winding folk up and there is defamation of character and for you to say that I have verbally abused players when I have not is tantamount to the latter in my book !
On average we have conceded just under 69 goals a season during RM’s tenure, now surely that is cause for concern as regards to his defensive strategies. It really is that simple ! The chances as many say are that we would eventually go down, there was never going to be any big money bandied about and we were never going to attract players of a certain standard but to keep making the same defensive mistakes over and over again was always going to catch up with us eventually. The Spurs and Swansea errors really did drive it home how inept our defense really is ! I just hope that whoever is our manager next season they address a glaringly obvious problem !
