Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
It’s Al’s thread ( Can’t spell his name properly! ) and he is the one who will get all the kudos for starting it. ‘Hedidn’tgotoBarnsley’ will get nothing! :)
Kudos? I don’t think you get any kudos for talking total shite for a year![/quote]
To be fair, he has probably had less to say on the matter than most since starting the thread.[/quote]
That’s true!
You live in Cloud Cuckoo Land pal. And learn how to read. I talked about major decisions. When it comes to what colour seats we should have in the stadium or what names we should give to the mascots then, quite rightly, the clubs lets the fans have a say. When it comes to the club’s finances and doing what is best for the team again, quite rightly, they won’t give your opinions a moment’s thought. What makes you think you are remotely qualified to advise them?
Stick to drinking Skol.
I hold a highly responsible position at work, these days. I wouldn’t employ you to sweep the car park.
And leave LMB’s avatar alone. It provides a welcome distraction when reading the drivel he writes.
I suppose that would be my first in Business Management with Psychology, [/quote]
Ooh, get you. I find that that those that brag about their academic qualifications know deep down that they’re not worth the paper they’re written on.
The rest of your post was just crap. Don’t try to be funny. You really can’t do it.
It’s Al’s thread ( Can’t spell his name properly! ) and he is the one who will get all the kudos for starting it. ‘Hedidn’tgotoBarnsley’ will get nothing! :)Kudos? I don’t think you get any kudos for talking total shite for a year!
And besides all that, if the club and its manager are happy to have the pre-season preparations away from the stadium – for whatever reason – it matters not a jot what you lot think, really.
Really? Then I suppose there is no longer a need for fans forums meetings or links to the supporters club. The voice of the fans who have supported this club through thick and thin must mean nothing then.
Ah well! I suppose all this not giving a jot might catch on to some of the junior supporters (the clubs future) and maybe, just maybe they may be tempted to the cherry and white side of the town.[/quote]
You don’t really think they care what fans think when it comes to major decisions about running the team and the club, do you?
The fact that some fans moan about no home friendlies year after year yet, year after year, the club persists with away friendlies, sort of proves my point.
Not that I needed it proving, I knew I was right.[/quote]
Yes I do, and Mr Jackson and his team go a long way to say this publicly. What sort of organisation do you think Mr Whelan is running here? How many times have we heard that it is a ‘family friendly’ club, a club for the fans’? I think that statement about them not caring is very arrogant indeed. Running the business, in this time of austerity, I can believe is very tight, however, running the club and team is, in my opinion, a partnership.
Let’s say there was a pub in Wigan that sold only Skol (because the landlord got it cheap, in bulk and, after all, it’s booze really) and then opened his doors for business – couldn’t see you or your mates in there, in fact couldn’t see anybody in there.
So I put to you again, that you are wrong. I really do hope that you don’t have a responsible position in your place of work.
Edit: Admins is this the sort of Avatar we are now allowing on this ‘family friendly’ board. I refer to Loudmouths.[/quote]
You live in Cloud Cuckoo Land pal. And learn how to read. I talked about major decisions. When it comes to what colour seats we should have in the stadium or what names we should give to the mascots then, quite rightly, the clubs lets the fans have a say. When it comes to the club’s finances and doing what is best for the team again, quite rightly, they won’t give your opinions a moment’s thought. What makes you think you are remotely qualified to advise them?
Stick to drinking Skol.
I hold a highly responsible position at work, these days. I wouldn’t employ you to sweep the car park.
And leave LMB’s avatar alone. It provides a welcome distraction when reading the drivel he writes.
And besides all that, if the club and its manager are happy to have the pre-season preparations away from the stadium – for whatever reason – it matters not a jot what you lot think, really.
Really? Then I suppose there is no longer a need for fans forums meetings or links to the supporters club. The voice of the fans who have supported this club through thick and thin must mean nothing then.
Ah well! I suppose all this not giving a jot might catch on to some of the junior supporters (the clubs future) and maybe, just maybe they may be tempted to the cherry and white side of the town.[/quote]
You don’t really think they care what fans think when it comes to major decisions about running the team and the club, do you?
The fact that some fans moan about no home friendlies year after year yet, year after year, the club persists with away friendlies, sort of proves my point.
Not that I needed it proving, I knew I was right.
And besides all that, if the club and its manager are happy to have the pre-season preparations away from the stadium – for whatever reason – it matters not a jot what you lot think, really.
OK. Lets play all our games away then! What the frig is wrong with wanting to watch your team at home ffs?
There is no reason we shouldn’t be playing at home.Whether you like it or not, we share our ground with the rugby who, you might have noticed (but maybe not), play in the summer. Minimising the number of games played on in total makes total sense – not entirely surprised you don’t get that, though.
Am I right in thinking we’ll be the last ever team to visit Griffin Park? What a great excuse to visit all 4 pubs again.I’m sure that a couple of those pubs have already closed.
Rugby league men calling a nondescript little tournament played between 3 countries that only actually have a regional competition and a couple of south pacific islands, ‘the word cup’ :lol:
Which 3 Countries are they then?[/quote]
You tell me, better still name me the other nations that give this nonsense of a sport legitimacy to call a competition ‘the rugby league world cup’ – flaming hell those notorious insular sports of baseball, basketball and American football are played professionally in more places than the M62 game.[/quote]
To be honest the baseball “World Series” has less legitimacy.[/quote
Ah the biggest misconception in sport.The World Series, as it was financially backed by “The World” newspaper, one of America,s biggest papers it would seem to me to be the only name it could be called. Before the darts world split into 2 championships the biggest prize in the sport was winning “The News Of The World” title. The name has never meant that it was the World Baseball Championship just the name of the backers. Daft and typically American but obvious as well.[/quote]
Well, I didn’t know that!
I have to admit it is funny that the city of Miami have refused his stadium twice now for his soccer franchise. Seems like his status isn’t as big as he thought.
Not half as funny as you turning a planning permission refusal because they don’t think the location his suitable into a personal jibe at Beckham, you could easily say the same about David Whelan and his attempts to build a training complex at Wrightington.[/quote]
I was thinking exactly that myself. Couldn’t for the life of me see why Beckham should be slagged off for a local council decision going against his club.[/quote]
Because like you griff he is an attention seeking ass* ole. Crawl back into your hole and do one.[/quote]
Something else me and Beckham have in common – neither of us give a flyer what you think[/quote]
You do ! :)[/quote]
I am rather impressed with my amazing knack of attracting complete tits to a thread just by posting (LMB and Standish exempt). Is it the school holidays already? That came round quick
I have to admit it is funny that the city of Miami have refused his stadium twice now for his soccer franchise. Seems like his status isn’t as big as he thought.
Not half as funny as you turning a planning permission refusal because they don’t think the location his suitable into a personal jibe at Beckham, you could easily say the same about David Whelan and his attempts to build a training complex at Wrightington.[/quote]
I was thinking exactly that myself. Couldn’t for the life of me see why Beckham should be slagged off for a local council decision going against his club.[/quote]
Because like you griff he is an attention seeking ass* ole. Crawl back into your hole and do one.[/quote]
Something else me and Beckham have in common – neither of us give a flyer what you think
I have to admit it is funny that the city of Miami have refused his stadium twice now for his soccer franchise. Seems like his status isn’t as big as he thought.
Not half as funny as you turning a planning permission refusal because they don’t think the location his suitable into a personal jibe at Beckham, you could easily say the same about David Whelan and his attempts to build a training complex at Wrightington.[/quote]
I was thinking exactly that myself. Couldn’t for the life of me see why Beckham should be slagged off for a local council decision going against his club.
Obstinate? Refusing to change his views?
I think that this post reveals more about you than Roberto.
Don’t agree. That was a damn good summary from Jrfatfan ( one of the most observant posters on this forum ). Well done JR.[/quote]
Oh well, if you agree with him, that’s it then…
Obstinate? Refusing to change his views?I think that this post reveals more about you than Roberto.
You’re joking, right? JR changes his mind more often than he changes his duds ;)
