Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
May not even get to be in the squad Saturday.Will need resting after all these reserve games.Question is would he be able to score at Championship level.
Seen absolutely no sign of it yet in bis time here. But, if you don’t play him he never will. So, either pick him from the start for a few games, or forget about him altogther.
Same applies to Riera (who looks a better prospect, to me). Get him in, or forget him altogther and bring back Holt.[/quote]
Wouldn’t score in a brothel with a grand in his pocket.
Stick someone alongside him in a 4-4-2 formation though and the lad will get a pon full.[/quote]
You are joking, aren’t you?[/quote]
;)[/quote]
Thank fook for that!The most widely used formation in international football is 4-2-3-1 and the top clubs in Europe have been using variations of 4-2-3-1 over the past decade. In the Champions League ,with the exception of Barcelona and Manchester United in recent years,all finalists have used a 4-2-3-1. Inter in 2010,Chelsea in ’12 and Bayern Munich in ’13,all have played with their own interpretation of the 4-2-3-1 and won the Champions League.
That can’t be right. Martinez invented this 1 up front rubbish, and everyone knows you’ll never win owt unless you have two strikers.[/quote]
To be fair, the way we are playing it at the moment isn’t working. But I think that says more about the ineffectual three behind the lone striker than anything else.
So, going with something different is worth a shot. That said, we tried playing with 2 strikers a few weeks and had all of about 0 shots on target if I recall correctly. hard to remember, I think I was asleep for most of it.[/quote]
I still wouldn’t mind seeing a 3-5-2, and as said yesterday, I’d play McManaman as one of the strikers.The most widely used formation in international football is 4-2-3-1 and the top clubs in Europe have been using variations of 4-2-3-1 over the past decade. In the Champions League ,with the exception of Barcelona and Manchester United in recent years,all finalists have used a 4-2-3-1. Inter in 2010,Chelsea in ’12 and Bayern Munich in ’13,all have played with their own interpretation of the 4-2-3-1 and won the Champions League.
That can’t be right. Martinez invented this 1 up front rubbish, and everyone knows you’ll never win owt unless you have two strikers.
Two strikers and a positive approach may do that. Or let’s just keep it His majesty Griff’s way and play one striker with his back to the goals.So are you getting the extra striker by taking a player from the already struggling midfield?
May not even get to be in the squad Saturday.Will need resting after all these reserve games.Question is would he be able to score at Championship level.
Seen absolutely no sign of it yet in bis time here. But, if you don’t play him he never will. So, either pick him from the start for a few games, or forget about him altogther.
Same applies to Riera (who looks a better prospect, to me). Get him in, or forget him altogther and bring back Holt.[/quote]
Wouldn’t score in a brothel with a grand in his pocket.
Stick someone alongside him in a 4-4-2 formation though and the lad will get a pon full.[/quote]
You are joking, aren’t you?
You could have been reading about Fortune there, loads pf pace and energy,willing to do his fair share of graft in defense.
We already have a forward that works his socks off, but has a poor goals per game ratio in the championship this year, we don’t need another. :ohmy:[/quote]
Most sensible thing you’ve psoted all year. ;)3-5-2 … 3 central defenders and wing backs with defence been the main priority. Boyce managed to convert to the role of a wing back a few year ago so I don’t see why some of the younger guys can’t.But we must stop leaking goals daft goals, those at Sheff Weds were laughable watching Ramis was like watching unders 6’s swarm towards the ball
I’d guess that Perch might make a decent wing back, as would Taylor.
My team would be:
Carson
3 centre backs (from Boyce, Ramis, Figuero, Barnett, Caldwell)
Perch, Kvist, Maloney, McCann, Taylor
Fortune, McManamanDon’t be such a bunch of mard arses. It’s a bit rich coming from a team with a set of fans that taunts Bolton for being “a town full of Pakis”.We should give the lad a lot of credit for managing to wind you all up so easily and for managing to type all that in the first place, what with the disadvantage of having to type with 6 fingers.
Plus, I’m pretty sure that the lad who made the Chingalings comment is a Wiganer. Tongue in cheek, self-deprecation. Put your dummies away!
Marshcp is a Wiganer – and Mudhutter contributer.
I don’t find it offensive personally.
I see it as tongue in cheek, and I’m pretty sure we’d be doing exactly the same had it been the other way round (although judging by that song that was sung at Sheffield Wednesday, maybe not)
something i have been saying for years selling players has got us where we are now
in the shyte
but also by not generating money we would be in the shyte
so basically we would be in shyte anyway
problem is we will end up with a ground too big for us we will need one like that in leigh
if only we had tried to keep the cream and made a fight of the prem league
instead of selling and bringing in poorer replacements
non league here we comeJust like Portsmouth did.
Fortune…..simply doesn’t score. Delort poor from what iv’e seen…Riera ….no thanks,so it’s Waghorn and Holt for me……Have you forgotten how bad Holt was when he played for us?
Forget alleged spats with Rosler. He was poor from the start under Coyle, and although marginally better at Huddersfield, they are not exactly desperate from him to stay with them for the season.
I remember the same being said about Paul Jewell.Funny Old Game Football.
Think our most exciting era was under Paul Jewell !
Mind you, them Russian girls at the top of the page look pretty exciting ![/quote]
That’s a matter of opinion. If you like long-ball, then yes, it was.PS. The Russian girls are a reflection of your browsing habits. I have an advert for Canterbury sports clothes.
I don’t think so and your comparisons is a load of tripe. I’ll go and ask my mum who is 84, to turn on my PC and do a bit of net surfing, she’ll not get past settling onto my computer chair. She has had a mobile phone that I bought her 10 years ago and she has not used it once, even though I show her what to do every time I see her.We are still in the generation whereby our parents and grandparents are stuck in their old ways, Whelan is one of them. Until that generation has died off, we will still hear those comments / phrases that have been common talk for the majority of their lives. Until they have all died off, we will still hear “I’m not going to that blackie doctor, I cant hear what he says” , “What we having for tea a chink or an Indian”, “wheres mi mum gone dad?, shes run off with a black man”.
Me and you will not say any of those things, especially in public, because we know it is seen as racist. Do I think our parents / grandparents are racist? No I don’t, its their culture and they don’t see that these phrases may offend anyone.
That’s the point in question and is what Dave Whelan is trying to explain to the media and is ruffling some feathers up.
I wish all these people who have spent the last few weeks chasing Whelan like a pack of wolves, would put their energy to better use and sift out all the drug dealers and pedophiles FFS. :angry:
You’ve just contradicted your first post!
‘Me and you will not say any of those things, especially in public, because we know it is seen as racist.’
Correct! It is seen as racist, so Mr Whelan should not say it!
If the whole nation was of his generation, then fair enough. Nobody would bat and eyelid.
We know it’s racist, so does most of the country. Therefore, DW, who is in the public eye, should not say it!
DW for priminister , sod this crusade against him , i dare anyone in the FA to say they have not said anything the same themselves its a load of bolloxs (can i say that)
The best post for me on this pathetic vendetta against Mr Whelan as everyone of us in the free western world are just as guilty as being racist and anyone who says they have never said the Chinky word are bare faced liars. Fcuk the FA, Wigan now and forever[/quote]
But would you say this to the national press – knowing that it is offensive to people?If so, you’re as stupid as he is.
People on this forum laugh about how insular Rugby League is, then they demonstrate the ‘fuck everyone else’ attitude that they laugh about.
Why is the company who makes jam not getting houndedBecause they haven’t voluntarily brought it up in the national press….again!
DW for priminister , sod this crusade against him , i dare anyone in the FA to say they have not said anything the same themselves its a load of bolloxs (can i say that)There you go. http://www.ukip.org/splash2?splash=1
Fill your boots.
