Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Sunderland on 35 I had
The goal of the season may not yet have happened and is waiting for the Villa match.That’s why I said so far ;)
I’ve already commented before on what the groundsmen have said. I don’t need too again. The thread was locked so we can stop the childish arguements.
The next person to start a thread or make a post relating to the pitch or to the rugby will be taking a break. There are plenty of things relating to WAFC to discuss at the moment so can we try to do that please? If you want to speak to a particular individual then use the PM facility.
EDIT – Sorry, I should have pointed out that you can start a rugby thread if you wish to actually discuss the sport on the non-football section.
Keep the same side that we’ve played the last 3 games.
Doesn’t need a thread of it’s own. That’s what PM’s are for.
Kone’s second at Reading
I could have guaranteed that there would be a thread about the pitch (granted started by someone else) on here today and there was.
The comment “But I do think that in future we shouldn’t play straight after the rugby have played and the fixtures of both clubs should be worked out accordingly.” indicates that the rugby ruined the pitch and the comment “The state of the pitch did nothing for our passing game, and definitely hampered our player in their performance” indicates that that was the reason we played poorly.
Neither statement is true.
Both are true, Conroy.
If you have any contact with the players, ask them and then truthfully put their answer on here. The ball looked hard to control…I wasn’t alone in seeing this. Folk around me in ES7 said the same.
Now come on pal, you’re not trying to tell me the rugby game the day before didn’t affect the pitch? Really?
Sorry, but you’re coming across as blinkered there, mate. I know you support both, but tell it as it is. I thought players found it hard going on that pitch.[/quote]
I have contact with the groundsman. I will trust his judgement of what does and doesn’t affect the pitch above yours thank you.
I will also refer you back to the comment about the 2002/2003 season. If those players can pass the ball around on that pitch then the players we have now should be able too as well considering the near perfect state it is in now.
End of thread.
I would say Figgy’s against Forest a round earlier would take some beating.Forgot that one yes. Great goal.
Di Canio all but confirmed as the new boss.
That will do for me.
Now that does strike me as desperation?[/quote]
Doesn’t make sense to me and I think it will be the final nail in their coffin.
Di Canio all but confirmed as the new boss.
That will do for me.
EDIT – Di Canio IS the new Sunderland Manager.
We never got to see that amazing celebration of his.Yes we did. He did it at Sunderland in the cup after they scored an own goal when he happened to be close by. THAT is how poor he was.
I could have guaranteed that there would be a thread about the pitch (granted started by someone else) on here today and there was.
The comment “But I do think that in future we shouldn’t play straight after the rugby have played and the fixtures of both clubs should be worked out accordingly.” indicates that the rugby ruined the pitch and the comment “The state of the pitch did nothing for our passing game, and definitely hampered our player in their performance” indicates that that was the reason we played poorly.
Neither statement is true.
Jason Scotland was overrated. And his rating was shiote.goodpost
Tough to pick just one really but the first one that has popped into my head is JORDAN HENDERSON.
A terrible player who somehow managed to con Liverpool out of a massive transfer fee. You can really see how far they’ve fallen as a club when they’re spending money on this guy.
Good goal today from him granted, but one swallow doesn’t make a summer.
Always been a big fan of that Suarez guy
-
AuthorPosts


