Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
“There has been a talk between the player and the chairman and they came to a compromise that both parties are very happy with.
The lad needs a history lesson on what the poppy really represents. [/quote]
Why don’t you tell us you fucking moron.
Made you an miserabloe twohat though lmb
Not content with stalking me on Vital then GT1978, you know nothing about me whatsoever whereas I know you was an insignificant nomark weasel all though your John Fisher schooling, and nothing seems to have changed.
I have at least the courage not to hide anonymously and feel the need to use different user names on other message boards.
So to make your match day experience better you suggest we ruin others by allowing smoking, thank god the law supports smoking bans, best thing that ever happened banning smoking in public places.
The bans/restrictions in smoking laws was one of the reasons I decided to quit and it was the best decision of my life when I did.
I notice the picture seems to have gone from Twitter. I hope someone (maybe Rosler, maybe DW) has b******ed him and asked what the **** he thinks he’s doing.It’s a good job I don’t swear :)
Does your boss dictate to you what you can do in your free time?
Why are people getting stressed about this, he was at home on his own time because Rosler had chosen to leave him out.
Don’t remember Gomez coming back for the gameHe was in disguise for a short while, but he has changed back now.
;)
I see Jordi played the full 90 minutes and scored a well taken goal.
Still miles better than anything we had on show against Fulham.
Espinoza had a cracker of a game on Saturday and also “scored a well taken goal”, I watched the Palace v Sunderland game tonight and Gomez was exactly the same as when he played for us good in parts, went down easy when challenged, gave the ball away a few times, scored a good goal, and looked terribly slow, I would not trade his performance tonight for Rogers on Saturday.[/quote]
I still prefer Gomez to him for his composure on the ball and his eye for a pass to unlock a defence.[/quote]
The pass that Espinoza made for Maloney’s goal on Saturday was as good as any ‘defence unlocking’ pass we have seen at the DW for a few years.
I see Jordi played the full 90 minutes and scored a well taken goal.Still miles better than anything we had on show against Fulham.
Espinoza had a cracker of a game on Saturday and also “scored a well taken goal”, I watched the Palace v Sunderland game tonight and Gomez was exactly the same as when he played for us good in parts, went down easy when challenged, gave the ball away a few times, scored a good goal, and looked terribly slow, I would not trade his performance tonight for Rogers on Saturday.
and no doubt get a rousing reception like Hugo did on Saturday.I’m all for showing a former player respect but it was a bit over the top. At least he didn’t score the winner but was instrumental in preventing us from getting all three points.
The only ones “instrumental in preventing us from getting all three points” on Saturday were our defenders. All 3 Fulham’s goals were mistakes by us.
Seems Sunderland fans are split on the Jordi issue as well, not just Wigan fans.
The red wine and cider may have taken it’s toll, but there were some valid points made. For what it’s worth, here’s my two penny’s worth.I also thought the other three midfielders weren’t up to it yesterday, although Forshaw’s ball through to Maloney was one high point.
As I said, Forshaw did play a good ball through for the goal, but didn’t really do a lot more. I think there is a decent footballer in there somewhere and hopefully he will settle in soon.
Is it you on the Red Wine and Cider, Forshaw must have done even less than you suggest, it was Espinoza who played Maloney in for the goal.
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Don’t be saying that, he who is always right will be telling you are talking crap !
I only wish that the midfielders that Rosler has signed, Huws, Cowie, Kist and four million quid Forshaw were as bad a Espinoza.[/quote]
Obsessed!
Why don’t you go back on Facebook and starting shouting the odds at people who clearly don’t even know you?[/quote]
Another of you lies, how do you know my post was aimed at you, now what were the words to that Carly Simon song – oh I remember ‘you’re so vain I bet you think this song is about you’
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Kiernan … Keep reading he’s going to be a good one.. Love to know exactly what they base that opinion on?Espinoza played very well today and took his goal well, too. Get you rose tinted specs off though, he dropped a few bollocks as well. ;)
Fortune was MOM by a street in my opinion. Forshaw decent. Nothing much to say about any of the others.[/quote]
You must mean that sublime “bollock” of a pass that Maloney scored from, whenever Espinoza make a mistake or gives the ball away he chases it down keeps going until he either wins it back or the pressure he creates allows someone else to do so, I wish golden boy McMananan did the same, he just stands there with his hands on his hips moaning while Roger and others clear his mess up.
