Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 100 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ivan Ramis -Good News or Bad News… #126674

    What, the same Coyle that insisted the club paying him £30k a week for three years?

    *And you accuse me of talking shit :woohoo:
    [/quote]

    What’s your point? Who else made the decision to give him a ridiculous contract? You? you seem to know everything else. Or maybe you know someone else who thinks they do and knows your gullible enough to fall for their shit.[/quote]

    Griff please take a friendly word of advice you will realise what a prick you are making of yourself when you sober up so just leave it for now. What on earth has Coyle’s tenure at the club got to do with Ramis’s contract or wages ?

    edit

    I have just realised in your drunken stupor you may be confusing Ramis with Holt, who was mentioned as well.

    Well to answer who sanctioned his wages ask your football playing buddy, as I think both him and his boss must have been the ACTUAL ones who sanctioned that “ridiculous contract”[/quote]

    Do you know what, you are absolutely right. Even before I saw your edit I realised I was indeed talking about Holt. Consider yourself in receipt of an unreserved apology! Sorry.

    And yes, they would have sanctioned it. But only because he asked for it. Just like Martinez asked for even more for Boselli, before you throw that at me! ;)[/quote]

    I wouldn’t dream of it.

    Btw did you have a good return to the drinking fold, I imagine its been like having a nagging toothache listening to those post match rants from the Leyland clan without the numbing effect of alcohol.

    in reply to: Ivan Ramis -Good News or Bad News… #126671

    What, the same Coyle that insisted the club paying him £30k a week for three years?

    *And you accuse me of talking shit :woohoo:
    [/quote]

    What’s your point? Who else made the decision to give him a ridiculous contract? You? you seem to know everything else. Or maybe you know someone else who thinks they do and knows your gullible enough to fall for their shit.[/quote]

    Griff please take a friendly word of advice you will realise what a prick you are making of yourself when you sober up so just leave it for now. What on earth has Coyle’s tenure at the club got to do with Ramis’s contract or wages ?

    edit

    I have just realised in your drunken stupor you may be confusing Ramis with Holt, who was mentioned as well.

    Well to answer who sanctioned his wages ask your football playing buddy, as I think both him and his boss must have been the ACTUAL ones who sanctioned that “ridiculous contract”

    in reply to: Ivan Ramis -Good News or Bad News… #126660

    The reason he’s not elsewhere right now is because he failed the medicals (another indictment of Coyle’s fitness regime in not helping him recover?)

    Amazing how some seem to demonise ex managers.

    Ramis was well into a long term recovery programme well before Coyle took over and returned to training at about the predicted time, his next bout of injury woes have happened under ‘Herr Tinkerman’.

    Perhaps the rush him back to get him sold policy overseen by Rosler is the real reason for his latest woes and Coyle’s cautious treatment of him was right.[/quote]

    * What, the same Coyle that insisted the club paying him £30k a week for three years?

    Not sure what your spin is on this but it’s nice to see you back talking the same shit you always used to. What’s Rosler done to upset you?[/quote]

    *And you accuse me of talking shit :woohoo:

    No problem with Rosler, my problem is with Wiganers who are making him out to be some form of football god, while claiming Coyle was the Devil.

    ps

    For someone who was inviting everyone to join you for a drink after your ‘ordeal’ you are home early, nobody turn up ?

    in reply to: maynard #126657
    Why start with maynard when fortune has started scoring

    Herr Tinkerman !

    in reply to: Ivan Ramis -Good News or Bad News… #126639
    The reason he’s not elsewhere right now is because he failed the medicals (another indictment of Coyle’s fitness regime in not helping him recover?)

    Amazing how some seem to demonise ex managers.

    Ramis was well into a long term recovery programme well before Coyle took over and returned to training at about the predicted time, his next bout of injury woes have happened under ‘Herr Tinkerman’.

    Perhaps the rush him back to get him sold policy overseen by Rosler is the real reason for his latest woes and Coyle’s cautious treatment of him was right.

    in reply to: Ivan Ramis -Good News or Bad News… #126636
    Which idiot sanctioned the £28K ( If this is true ) a week wage for Holt !!!

    Oh it’s true.

    in reply to: Ivan Ramis -Good News or Bad News… #126633
    Ivan Ramis decided he wanted to leave the club but unfortunately for him he failed medicals at both Cardiff and Palace.

    What is your opinion of him now he remains a Latics player, well at least to the end of the season. Get him fit and in the team, after all he is one of our better players when he manages to get on the field.

    or

    Outcast him to the development Squad knowing that he really wanted out of our club to get back into the premier league [for at least a few months, bearing in mind the plight of the two clubs that wanted him]

    Ramis did not decide he wanted to leave he was touted by the club in the same way, and for the same reason Holt was, FINANCIAL, Ramis is our highest paid player on 35k per week and for that reason alone the club wanted him out, just as they wanted Holts 28k per week off the books.

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126631

    590

    591[/quote]

    592[/quote]

    593[/quote]

    594[/quote]

    595[/quote]

    596[/quote]

    597[/quote]

    598[/quote]

    599

    There you go you do the 600

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126630

    590

    591[/quote]

    592[/quote]

    593[/quote]

    594[/quote]

    595[/quote]

    596[/quote]

    597[/quote]

    598[/quote]

    599

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126629

    590

    591[/quote]

    592[/quote]

    593[/quote]

    594[/quote]

    595[/quote]

    596[/quote]

    597[/quote]

    598

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126628

    590

    591[/quote]

    592[/quote]

    593[/quote]

    594[/quote]

    595[/quote]

    596[/quote]

    597

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126627

    590

    591[/quote]

    592[/quote]

    593[/quote]

    594[/quote]

    595[/quote]

    596

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126626

    590

    591[/quote]

    592[/quote]

    593[/quote]

    594[/quote]

    595

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126625

    590

    591[/quote]

    592[/quote]

    593[/quote]

    594

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126624

    590

    591[/quote]

    592[/quote]

    593

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 100 total)