Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 100 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pitch Wreckers #126985
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    16,000 on not bad for friday a good five thousand from hudersfield if not more
    great result

    In case you were not aware, the 5000 in the South Stand is a home end for rugby. The 1500 or so Huddersfield fans were at the other end.

    Lets hope for a Huddersfield double this weekend.[/quote]

    Which stand was you sat in muttyshitedog ?

    While your answering that one, which stand are you sitting in tomorrow at the stadium of light.

    in reply to: Beckham #126930
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts
    I know its his money so he can invest where he wants to but why not invest in a small club in England. Probably be money in to a bottomless pit over here and a right little earner for him over there.

    You really don’t do yourself any favours do you, before posting why don’t you do a little background research, the last franchise team in Miami went to the wall with debts of over $25 million dollars, so whatever Beckhams motives are it is not because he sees a “right little earner”

    in reply to: Pitch Wreckers #126928
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts
    I bow to you oh mighty Griff and after 40 years working in the Horticulture industry and associating with some of the top sports turf experts in the country it most be so obvious I know nowt!!

    Sorry donnys page, I would not dream of supporting anything griff says if there was any sort of doubt, but you said :-

    We must have one of the worst pitches in the league.

    You post “after 40 years working in the Horticulture industry and associating with some of the top sports turf experts in the country” If your experience is 40 years in the trade why state this when it is clearly not so.

    Even laymen like most of us can see and have stated the pitch is in pretty good nick at the moment, as Leylandlatic correctly posts, the amount of rain put down on Saturday alone, playing on it would have destroyed the DW pitch in the past.

    One thing I have noticed is that we now have some gantry frame lighting units that are used to substitute sunlight and aid growing in winter on damaged areas, I have been down to the stadium a few times midweek this season and they have always been on, I don’t think we had these in the past and they may be the reason for the improvements.

    in reply to: Pitch Wreckers #126911
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    Funny how peoples view of things differ so much.

    I heard the chap behind me at half time on Saturday talking to someone say “this pitch is looking pretty good seeing the weather we have had this winter and its February” I looked up and down the pitch and mentally nodded in agreement.

    Last season if my mind serves me right we played 21 games on the pitch 19 PL + 1 FA cup & 1 league cup, year before I think it was just 19 PL games, this season we have already played 14 league games, 3 European, 2 FA Cup for a total of 19, then you can add 3 full training sessions for the European teams we played, so its had plenty hammer already.

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126877
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    I can understand people fishing for trout on some remote loch in NW Scotland,or fishing for marlin whilst on an exotic holiday.
    What I cannot get is why a bloke from Wigan would sit on a canal bank opposite the old bone works hoping to catch a perch no bigger than his dick!

    Fishing (in Wigan) is what dickheads do.

    Now,can we get back to football?

    numpty boy.
    I have done all of the above EXCEPT fish the canal in Wigan, especially opposite the old bone works.(well, not for a very long time anyway)

    nowt worse than making a cunt of yourself whilst trying and failing to make a cunt out of someone else eh sonny.

    now back to fishing.
    I have just been to the River Annan for 3 days, pity it was flooded.
    BTW it’s not in Wigan

    Paul Young[/quote]

    John don’t rise to it you need ‘love of the common people’

    in reply to: maynard #126830
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    My contribution in this debate is about you and your opinions and the way you dismiss with sarcasm or insults anyone who differs from you, so I pointed out all the teams that are playing a front two and the success they are having doing so, despite anything you claim.

    If you want to know my preferred line up or formation it is exactly the same as what Martinez wanted to play – in general a mobile front 3 with no player tied to a fixed role like we played with Kone, McManaman and Maloney or the season before with Moses, Di Santo and Maloney, but as Martinez also said he also didn’t want to be tied to any one system and unlike you neither do I.

    Why the fuck would I be interested in what you think?[/quote]

    God knows, but you seem to contribute(polite for ‘stick your nose in’) to every post I ever make on here so perhaps you may explain it.

    Please let us all know when you are taking your leave of absence won’t you, a few more ex posters who you have forced off here with your nasty, vindictive cyber bullying might then start coming back.

    Sit back and wait for the predictable insults.

    in reply to: maynard #126827
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    Your proposed sabbatical didn’t last very long.

    I never actually said when it would start. But as usual, you have read things that weren’t written and/or not read things that were.

    You claimed and have done for a while that 2 up front is consigned to history, my list sort of muddies the water of your opinion would you not think?

    “Almost nobody” plays that way was the phrase I used, not “consigned to history”. But you crack on, just make shit up like you always do.

    Doesn’t matter about the personnel, team or formation whether its 2 wingers, wing backs or fullbacks getting forward all those teams play 2 out and out strikers and they are the highest scoring teams and title challengers or leaders in all three leagues.

    Maybe it doesn’t to you, but I was addressing the specific desire of Donny for us to play with two strikers and two wingers. But again, that would require you to read what was written rather than make up stuff to suit your argument.

    Bored now. Standish, WGTB and others seem to have got it and are in the process od successfully blowing a hole in your opinion or whatever other over the top, ridiculous phrase it was that you used.[/quote]

    Plenty accusations of what I have and haven’t read or digested yet you do the same in your very last statement about my opinion, when you don’t have a clue what my opinion is.
    My contribution in this debate is about you and your opinions and the way you dismiss with sarcasm or insults anyone who differs from you, so I pointed out all the teams that are playing a front two and the success they are having doing so, despite anything you claim.

    If you want to know my preferred line up or formation it is exactly the same as what Martinez wanted to play – in general a mobile front 3 with no player tied to a fixed role like we played with Kone, McManaman and Maloney or the season before with Moses, Di Santo and Maloney, but as Martinez also said he also didn’t want to be tied to any one system and unlike you neither do I.

    in reply to: maynard #126806
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    Do you still have an outside toilet and send your kids down the mines, too?

    The lone striker approach has got nothing to do with Martinez, stop being so obsessed!!! Almost nobody plays with 2 strikers and 2 wingers as your mate Donny Dark Ages is advocating. Mind you, he thought McEachran was shite so all he is doing with each post he makes is demonstrating how far out of step he is with most other people’s opinions.

    Man City 68
    Liverpool 58

    Leicester 52
    Burnley 42
    Derby 57
    Forest 46
    Reading 47

    Brentford 51
    Wolves 49
    Orient 59
    Rotherham 51

    Leading scorers in top three divisions, all play 2 up front, look at the league tables where they are.

    They may not play wingers on both flanks but use full backs to get forward and that fill that roll, but it shows that “having an outside toilet” can be quite successful.[/quote]

    Well done there, not “bolding” the bit about playing 2 wingers as well as two strikers to competely suit your argument and diminish mine. You’re not a woman are you? ;)

    I’ll just respond re the top two in your list because I don’t claim to have the encyclopaedic knowledge of the formations of many teams down to League 1, and if you do, you probably need to get out more.

    Liverpool do have two strikers – and two bloody good ones at that – but they do not play as a conventional front two, as in the old typical 442 formation with two wide men – or wingers – which is what our friend Donny has been talking about.

    As for City, well you can have that one, for two reasons:

    a) they hardly fall into the same category as other teams do they and in any case, again, they play far more fluidly than just as a conventional front two. Granted, at least when Dzeko and Aguerro play together, there is a big ‘un and a little ‘un which Donny might recognise from his old Shoot! magazines.

    b) I said “almost nobody” plays that way which implies exceptions. I accept that I didn’t make this clear by putting it in bold; but had I done so, you would probably only have removed it.

    There! Didn’t insult anybody there, did I? Very sarcastic, I grant you, but a) that’s me and b) so was yours.[/quote]

    Your proposed sabbatical didn’t last very long.

    You claimed and have done for a while that 2 up front is consigned to history, my list sort of muddies the water of your opinion would you not think?

    Doesn’t matter about the personnel, team or formation whether its 2 wingers, wing backs or fullbacks getting forward all those teams play 2 out and out strikers and they are the highest scoring teams and title challengers or leaders in all three leagues.[/quote]

    A majority of teams in the Premier League play the same formation that we do – including the team currently at the top of the league and the one in third place.

    Liverpool certainly don’t play a conventional 4-4-2, and for large parts of the season when either Suarez or Sturridge have been injured, they’ve played with one up front.

    City have also varied it with 1, 2 and even 3 up front.

    So it would appear that playing 4-4-2 doesn’t necesarily mean you’ll win more games than those who don’t play it.

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1813274-premier-league-revolution-formation-analysis-of-the-season-so-far#articles/1813274-premier-league-revolution-formation-analysis-of-the-season-so-far%5B/quote%5D

    I hate to rain on your parade Standish but you and your mate griff may not have realised just yet, we are not in the premier league any longer and from where I sit the all the teams at the top of our league are scoring goals and playing two strikers in tandem.

    in reply to: maynard #126803
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    Do you still have an outside toilet and send your kids down the mines, too?

    The lone striker approach has got nothing to do with Martinez, stop being so obsessed!!! Almost nobody plays with 2 strikers and 2 wingers as your mate Donny Dark Ages is advocating. Mind you, he thought McEachran was shite so all he is doing with each post he makes is demonstrating how far out of step he is with most other people’s opinions.

    Man City 68
    Liverpool 58

    Leicester 52
    Burnley 42
    Derby 57
    Forest 46
    Reading 47

    Brentford 51
    Wolves 49
    Orient 59
    Rotherham 51

    Leading scorers in top three divisions, all play 2 up front, look at the league tables where they are.

    They may not play wingers on both flanks but use full backs to get forward and that fill that roll, but it shows that “having an outside toilet” can be quite successful.[/quote]

    Well done there, not “bolding” the bit about playing 2 wingers as well as two strikers to competely suit your argument and diminish mine. You’re not a woman are you? ;)

    I’ll just respond re the top two in your list because I don’t claim to have the encyclopaedic knowledge of the formations of many teams down to League 1, and if you do, you probably need to get out more.

    Liverpool do have two strikers – and two bloody good ones at that – but they do not play as a conventional front two, as in the old typical 442 formation with two wide men – or wingers – which is what our friend Donny has been talking about.

    As for City, well you can have that one, for two reasons:

    a) they hardly fall into the same category as other teams do they and in any case, again, they play far more fluidly than just as a conventional front two. Granted, at least when Dzeko and Aguerro play together, there is a big ‘un and a little ‘un which Donny might recognise from his old Shoot! magazines.

    b) I said “almost nobody” plays that way which implies exceptions. I accept that I didn’t make this clear by putting it in bold; but had I done so, you would probably only have removed it.

    There! Didn’t insult anybody there, did I? Very sarcastic, I grant you, but a) that’s me and b) so was yours.[/quote]

    Your proposed sabbatical didn’t last very long.

    You claimed and have done for a while that 2 up front is consigned to history, my list sort of muddies the water of your opinion would you not think?

    Doesn’t matter about the personnel, team or formation whether its 2 wingers, wing backs or fullbacks getting forward all those teams play 2 out and out strikers and they are the highest scoring teams and title challengers or leaders in all three leagues.

    in reply to: maynard #126799
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts
    Do you still have an outside toilet and send your kids down the mines, too?

    The lone striker approach has got nothing to do with Martinez, stop being so obsessed!!! Almost nobody plays with 2 strikers and 2 wingers as your mate Donny Dark Ages is advocating. Mind you, he thought McEachran was shite so all he is doing with each post he makes is demonstrating how far out of step he is with most other people’s opinions.

    Man City 68
    Liverpool 58

    Leicester 52
    Burnley 42
    Derby 57
    Forest 46
    Reading 47

    Brentford 51
    Wolves 49
    Orient 59
    Rotherham 51

    Leading scorers in top three divisions, all play 2 up front, look at the league tables where they are.

    They may not play wingers on both flanks but use full backs to get forward and that fill that roll, but it shows that “having an outside toilet” can be quite successful.

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126768
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts
    ”or do you prefer Reflex?”

    I think Duran Duran are shit !

    “Too Much Information”

    in reply to: gomez shuts them up again #126756
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    That Gomez is crap get rid of him !

    in reply to: How Long Before “Bottom Four Bob” #126751
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts
    No wonder this site is slowly dying

    Pity it’s not you.

    Only joking pal

    Dace are dying out on some rivers.

    Ray Marlow.

    Is that Roy Marlow’s brother ?

    in reply to: Markus Holgersson #126721
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts
    in reply to: Ivan Ramis -Good News or Bad News… #126681
    loudmouthblue2damian walker
    Player
    • 8 Posts Started
    • 108 Total Posts

    muppet

    Go away, the big children are having an argument, here. Nothing to do with the likes of you.[/quote]

    You call that stuff an argument. Wait until I get going.[/quote]

    Have you just thanked yourself in an alter ego?[/quote]

    It was a joke, based on a question I was asked in another thread, but as always I wouldn’t expect you to understand.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 100 total)