TyldesleyLatic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,566 through 2,580 (of 2,587 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Question Time #11005

    I’m looking forward to Mr Griffin making a bit of a plank of himself on TV tonight
    He only had to have some foreign news channel shove a microphone in his face on his first day at the European parliament before he started banging on about torpedoing (dunno about my spelling there) boats of immigrants crossing the med & chucking them life jackets

    in reply to: Africa 2010 #10614

    :lol:

    I see your point but it was a big campsite out on the east coast, full & over the big bank holiday weekend over there so plenty of pickings for anyone who was opportunist enough

    Besides which if you go to an official, legit campsite over there they are liable to have blokes with big guns on the entrance & regular patrols by blokes with big guns. Not sure I’d be tempted to half inch the contents of someone’s tent when faced with them!!

    in reply to: Africa 2010 #10610

    “If you want to go camping in South Africa, crack on with it son. I’d wager a small fortune on you having everything you own robbed within 24 hours of getting there”

    i went camping for a week whilst over there & got nowt robbed

    “Also – it’s the rainy season isn’t it????”

    I aint sure on that one – I think there rainy season is in their summer (our winter). Even though its scorching you tend to find when England cricket tour there (December & January) that alot of days get rained off.
    I went in July/August, it rained once & the temp was in the late 60’s early 70’s (which they thought was cold)

    in reply to: Heskey #10608

    I can see your point but Fulham have had one good season & got in Europe. This season they aint doing as well & are unlikely to finish in as high a place
    Everton have been in the top 5 for as long as we’ve been in the top flight.
    That’s the difference there. Everton aren’t a middle ranking team. They’re a top team & have been for a good few years

    Yes baines played for the U21’s whilst with but he was criminally overlooked by that set up for years when he was the highest placed (in terms of his clubs league position) English U21 left back in the country with Jewell even admitting that when he recommended him to an England U21 scout they said “Who?” Peter Taylor even used to pick Dan Harding in front of him despite his club (Brighton) being a league below Latics
    Whilst at Latics he was also criminally overlooked for the main England squad behind a crock of $h!te like Nicky Shorey & a Wayne Bridge that wasn’t getting a game at his club & when loaned out to Fulham got skinned by Gary Teale.
    Once he’d overcome his hamstring problems & made the left back spot his own at Everton he was picked for the main England squad within months. Unfortunately before him, now Bridge is a regular at City he won’t make the world cup squad but he’ll be first back up. He wouldn’t have been had he stayed at Latics

    “As things stand now, I fail to see how he’s furthered his career. Don’t get me wrong, he’s a cracking player, but, apart from the odd UEFA Cup game, where’s the benefit?”
    Do you mean apart from the fact he plays in a top 6 side every week, gets more exposure for them than he ever would have for us when he scores, sets up etc.. & plays European football where he may even attract the attention of European scouts?
    You’re right it would have been far better for him to stay at a bottom half club who get knocked out of all the cup competitions at the early stage, flog all their best players as soon as a decent offer comes in & who get diddley squat media coverage in comparison to Everton

    If you were making your comments 6 or 7 months into his first season theer I could understand your point but (IMO) it seems to be a viewpoint thats a good year out of date

    in reply to: Heskey #10601

    “It’s debateable whether Bainesy has gone on to better things”

    What complete & total $h!te – of course he has gone on to better things since he left Latics.
    Yes, his first season with em was disrupted by injury but he got a chance to stake a claim for a regular starting berth relatively early on last season & he’s grabbed it with both hands.
    He’s now playing in a side that pushes for a Champions League spot (even if it is on the fringes of that), he’s playing in European competitions & he was called up for the England squad
    If that isn’t going on to better things since leaving Latics I don’t know what is!!!

    so “Is his profile higher now than when he was with us?” – yes it is

    “Back in the old days, we could boast of a team of top league players who were ex-Latics, so we were certainly producing them then” – That I’d agree with. One of the reasons I hate Crewe so much is all the bull that the media used to dig up about dario Gradi’s production line of talent in the ealy to mid 90’s (though some still do!), yet I remember seeing an article around that time with a list of lower league clubs who had produced players who were (at the time) earning their crust in the top flight – Latics were top. Crewe were several places down

    in reply to: Jimmy Bullards comeback #10513

    If Jimmy Bullard didn’t want to earn £X grand a week for the 3 years from 2005-2008 (or however long his contract was) but actually wanted £X+X grand a week then he shouldn’t have signed the contract in the summer of 2005
    I’m guessing that he signed it coz his agent knew it was the best offer he would get at the time. By April 2006 his agent started to twist his ear that some clubs had contacted him & were prepared to offer Bullard the £X+X grand a week so he should go back to the Latics board & demand a new contract for that amount or he’d be off

    That to me is mercenary. Its exactly what I’d probably do in the same circumstances but its still mercenary. another poster further up the thread had it right when they said “every pro-footballer is in it for the money”

    They are & my initial point was trying to show that Bullard was no different than any of the others as the first poster was trying to do

    in reply to: Jimmy Bullards comeback #10374

    I said “allegedly” allowed his agent to tout his sell on clause to other clubs as Bullard tells one story & the club tells another. Personally I feel that the truth probably lies somewhere in between but (as with Ellington & WBA) I find it coincidental that Fulham knew exactly how much they needed to bid in order to be allowed to speak to him

    As for his actions at Fulham – IMO it shows nothing of the sort about committing long-term to Fulham. They’d spent alot of money signing him & spent more still during hsi long rehabilitation. Almost immediately he came back he started talking about wanting a new deal. Again just my opinion but that is mercenary. If he wasn’t he’d have thanked Fulham for all their effort in getting him fit & talked about rewarding that. Instead he started to publicly come out & state he wanted a new deal. If he didn’t think his deal (which he was less than half way through) was good enough then he shouldn’t have signed it in the first place

    I liked him at Latics & you can see that after dropping down to non-league he appreciates how lucky he is to have made his way back but he’s as mercenary as the rest of modern day footballers. His actions in wanting new deals when the ink is barely dry on his old ones are to me shining examples of that

    in reply to: stan collymore #10338

    What’s he gonna do with the other £1,998,000 then if you only want him to give £2k to charity?

    in reply to: Jimmy Bullards comeback #10337

    “why can’t these injuries happen to the mercenaries that have infected our game”

    Whilst I wouldn’t have wished his injuries on anyone I’d class Bullard as a mercenary
    Sure he plays with a smile on his face & is a team joker but lets not forget that this is the fella who wanted to re-negotiate his deal with Latics less than a year after signing a new & improved deal. The same fella who (allegedely if you believe some stories) gave his agent permission to tout his “sell on clause” to every club in the top flight when he didn’t get the new deal he wanted. And the same fella who having spent donkey’s out with a career threatening injury & who had by no means proved his long term fitness started to come out in the press & state he wanted Fulham to offer him a new long term deal (even though he had 18 months to run on his existing deal) & if they didn’t he would look to move on
    Not to mention his alleged £50k a week wage at Hull (not that I or anyone else would turn down them wages like!!)

    Yep he puts more effort into 1 game than Kapo does in a whole season but IMO some of his actions off the pitch mark him out as just as mercenary as most of the other players about these days

    in reply to: positives #9579

    “Unless of course you’re going so you can throw your season ticket at Roberto?”

    Bit early for that I think. I find it best to wait till you’ve only got one game left on the ticket anyway ;)

    in reply to: positives #9492

    One of my worries about appointing Bobby & his backroom team of the likes of Graeme Jones & Graham Barrow would be that some of the ego’s in the team might not look at 3 blokes who never played outside of the bottom 2 divisions, & some of whose only experience outside those 2 divisions was a 9 month stint in charge of a club who finished 8th & think “Who the feck are these 3 to try & tell me how to play football the right way, I know & have experienced more about high level football in 5 minutes than this lot have combined”

    Not Bobby’s fault if it did/does happen (or is happening) but comments from opposition managers that the players aren’t listening to him or the manager complaining after Saturday’s game that they didn’t play as instructed shows to me that it migh be happening

    in reply to: positives #9484

    I know what you’re trying to say Griff & I’ve been watching Latics long enough to be able to take a defeat on the chin without demanding the manager’s head on a plate but its the manner of certain defeats that gets a reaction from me & saturday’s game was one of them
    Likewise when all but one of the performances this season have been shite (IMO) then you start to notice a pattern!!

    in reply to: positives #9465

    When Jewell was in charge he used to say quite openly that he wrote off the games against the bigger sides before the season began. He used to say it befroe the season & he used to come out in the press & say it in the week building up to the games.
    I could see where he was coming from but you could also see more often than not the effect that this had on the players & the whole attitude of the team showed they were beaten before a ball was kicked.
    Under Steve Bruce that outlook changed & whilst we still never won, the performances against the bigger clubs got better, we stopped shipping so many goals against em, we actually went to their gorunds & took points off em & hell at times looked like we might actually beat em.
    You could see the players attitude had changed & a few of em even came out in the press & said that due to the preparation & manager they actually went into the games believing they could get something out of em for the first time. Hell the club even started to progress up the table for a couple of seasons
    So, to me, the suggestion that we should play stiffs & youth teamers against the big clubs is a pathetic one no matter how tongue in cheek it was. If your only aim is to survive & you surrender games against certain clubs before a ball is kicked then you may as well not bother to play in the top flight
    Unless of course you’re quite happy listening to your manager after seeing him rest 6 players at the likes of United & Liverpool – the latter of which was a pathetic display that he tried to justify on the grounds he’d got his tactics spot on coz we hadn’t got a kicking. Nevermind Liverpool had rested a shedful of players coz the had a European Cup tie & there was a chance we could have got somet out of it. Like Fulham did against a similarly weakened Liverpool side 2 weeks later!!

    in reply to: positives #9408

    I’m sorry, but from what I’ve seen the quality of football being dished up so far under Martinez (Villa game apart) is garbage

    Yes Latics always lose to the “big 4” but its the manner of the defeats to the 2 we’ve played from there which is most worrying. Bar the odd spanking here & there we’ve usually put up a decent fight against the bigger sides & you can see the graft being put in by the players.
    After the 1st goal was conceded against United the side fell to pieces & all bar one of the goals were really poor ones to concede. The goals against Arsenal were all poor ones – a defender outjumping 3 defenders, no-one picking up the run of a centre half in open play from his own half to the edge of our penalty area & the other 2 were rank marking
    The way the players seem to “give up” at present is worrying

    Considering we seem to have 25 midfielders on our books with another one on the way the midfield is shocking & teams seem to be able to stroll through them at will. The fact Arsenal should have had double their 4-0 win should set alarm bells ringing. Wolves could have had a hatful. So could West Ham

    We’ve had one of the best defences in the top flight for the last 2 seasons & in little over a month its turned into one of the worst

    In the 7 games under Martinez we’ve seen one decent performance.
    There were Latcis fans who said they would rather see us get relegated trying to play good football under Bobby than be successful under Bruce with his style of play. I think they may get their wish

    in reply to: New Premiership ‘Home-Grown’ Player Rule. #8763

    barely any difference whatsoever which is why the “big clubs” have agreed to it

Viewing 15 posts - 2,566 through 2,580 (of 2,587 total)