Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
3-5-2 … 3 central defenders and wing backs with defence been the main priority. Boyce managed to convert to the role of a wing back a few year ago so I don’t see why some of the younger guys can’t.
But we must stop leaking goals daft goals, those at Sheff Weds were laughable watching Ramis was like watching unders 6’s swarm towards the ball
Have followed the Tics since 1968, and have to say that yesterday felt like the lowest of the low. Okay, in the distant past we’ve had pretty tough times but then again our expectations weren’t too great. Now we have a team of pretty decent players that should be able to hold their own in the Championship, let alone challenge for promotion; and none of them ( Boycey apart ) wouldn’t feature in my all time Latics squad !I originally thought we had one of the best squads in the Division, I’ve now changed my opinion on that. It’s a squad made up of “good players” and not 1 game changer amongst them.
Pay them on performance and by Christmas Day they’d all be driving Nissan Micra’s dressed in their George jacket n slacks. They must quietly pish themselves when the put their debit cards in the hole in the wall
He’s merely pointing out that he “use” to call it Chingalings, that was the era he and millions of others grew up in, wrong now but it happened so live with it.
He is not saying he still uses this term nowdays he’s drawing reference to his past, good or bad ? it doesn’t matter, it happened or shall we wipe every reference ever made to other races and cultures through time gone by and never draw back so we can all move forward ?.
Standish , so you are saying it is wrong to say ” When I was younger I called it the Chinky chippy” ?
I commend him for saying it as it was , there’s not dinks/bangs/dents/nicks/scrapes in his armour . . . . I didn’t want to offend you and the 1.4 billion chinese reading thisI think the reason the FA are dragging their heels with the MacKay incident is the repercussions if the FA were to find him guilty, privacy laws have to be taken into consideration.
I personally don’t the FA will taken action, can you imagine it, the FA having to investigate every claim regarding racist remarks sent from footballers phones in a one 2 one private text or email ?.
If its just those texts (or even similar additional ones that have yet to come to light) then the FA can’t do anything. Aside from privacy laws they set themselves a precedent when they said they couldn’t charge Scudamore with anything when his former secretary leaked what some deemed sexist emails, on the grounds that it was private communication between 2 individuals
What I’ve read the delay is in either charging or not charging him, is that they want to investigate whether there are any texts/emails in the public domain and/or whether they type of language used in the ones currently known about is indicative of a culture of prejudice operated by Mackay when he was in charge at Cardiff.
The comments from the South Korean player’s agent would indicate that there wasn’t whilst the comments that have come from the player who claims he was known as the “wee Eyptian” would indicate that others felt there was (or may have been).
So aside from just looking through the texts & emails provided to them by Cardiff I think they’re also going to be interviewing staff at the club[/quote]Of course they can! They are not looking to bring criminal charges, this is an internal football charge loosely based on the old “bringing the game into disrepute” scenario. Wehther they should, or whether they want to risk someone counter-suing the is another matter altogether.[/quote]
For the game to be brought into disrepute that would mean someone going public denouncing something or someone within the game, text sent privately cannot do this. If “wee egyptian” is bringing the game into disrepute then there’s fook all down for the wee jock Barry BannanI think the reason the FA are dragging their heels with the MacKay incident is the repercussions if the FA were to find him guilty, privacy laws have to be taken into consideration.
I personally don’t the FA will taken action, can you imagine it, the FA having to investigate every claim regarding racist remarks sent from footballers phones in a one 2 one private text or email ?.
When will he learn, I watched it and was on pins waiting for another slip of the tongue. Luckily he came through unscathed
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/30338539Why didn’t he mention about the text been private and the FA’s previous statements regarding private text and how they don’t get invloved
Rio Ferdinand want’s to remember before he blasts off he’s was a twitter sent for all to see not like that nob at Liverpool , MacKays was private.
I thought the texts were sent on a Cardiff owned phone? Otherwise how would Tan have known about them? Malky is hardly MI5 material :unsure:[/quote]
Wasn’t Iain Moody under investigation and a court order to search Moody’s home hence hard drives and phones were searched. MacKay was in the process of a 7.5 million pound claim against Tan and Tan was looking for 1 scrap of evidence to get the claim thrown out. The day after the text were found MacKay dropped his claim.
The agent in question , Phil Smith , is he related to Larry Fine ?And this is just taking the urine , wee egyptian ?? wtf ?;-
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/08/22/malky-mackay-wee-egyptian_n_5698746.html
We seem to hark on about 2 up front , loan striker crap, average players bought in but what we have forgot to mention is the goals we concede and how poor the defence and goals conceded are.
MacKay needs to concentrate on defence first and everything else 2nd,
Every game starts off with a point in the bag, the problem is, we just never finish that way
and forshaw is one of many bad signings by roslerHow can he win Div1 Player Of The Year award then be so poor on a regular basis ?. If we drop down keep him , it must be his level
How on earth has Arse face Tan not been charged by the F.a. Surely calling Dave,our manager plus our fans racist.Is that not bringing the game into dispute. :ohmy:Because that would offend certain parties, people like Tan destroy football
this artical sums it up better;-
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/if-dave-whelans-a-racist-then-im-a-chinaman/16260?#.VHhkLzGsXlQJust like Whelan he doesn’t truly know that the term “chinaman” has also been added to the ever growing list of banned racist words. till recently I didn’t know.
”abusive and/or insulting and/or constitute improper conduct and/or bring the game into disrepute”
Am I right in thinking that no racist charges have been dished out ?
the charge also states that it is an “aggravated breach” as it included a reference to ethnic origin and/or race and/or nationality and/or belief
I don’t know whether that constitutes a charge of racism or not[/quote]
I haven’t seen that yet
So “abusive and/or insulting and/or constitute improper conduct” can mean pish off nobhed
“and/or bring the game into disrepute” the ref was a tosser, it’s a fix
To me it sounds like their sounding him out after Whelan said he would step down if charged. What I think Whelan meant was if he charged with racist remarks which the above clearly does not say.
The only clear thing is, the Lawyers will be rubbing their hands with this one
“abusive and/or insulting and/or constitute improper conduct and/or bring the game into disrepute”
Am I right in thinking that no racist charges have been dished out ?
There 4 pts above us and Holt has scored 2, that’s hardly setting the world alight. Leave him be, he seems happy enough and possibly extend his loan I’d say. I would sooner see us use the forwards we have at hand and use them as forwards rather than a headless chicken. I thought the return of McCann looked promising pushing forward so hopefully our forwards will have something to feed off.
3 center halfs
2 wing backs
3 in the middle
2 up front, yes 2 !!So the MacKay text regarding “money slip through a ***s hand”, I left the words out incase it offended anyone (ffs).
So lets say the agent in question was not Jewish but Scottish, Scottish been the brunt of all “tight with cash” jokes since the dawn of time. Would the text have created the same amount of uproar if the text said “money slip through a Jocks hands” , ?? or is Jock now banned and Jockeys have to be called horsemen ??
I noticed a few 1000 Spurs fans singing Yids at Hull, ahhhh but that’s OK , are they exempt ? or is it just because there’s so many ?.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YidI have never heard as much bollox in my life over something as trivial as all this shite.
My heads scrambled with all this
Well, who’da thowt![/quote]
maggot
