Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
First of all I dont think your being harsh, just think you’re retarded.
Second, I could have told you or searhed up on what things mean BUT why have you just put them all for no reason?haha I did know that to be honest… but he could be on about my post as he didn’t say which one made me smile.
Of course you did son.[/quote]
Course I did, everybody on here licks your arris because they’re scared of you, or so it would seem
:)Yeah, come on Loudmouth – explain yourself, dipsh*t ;)
you being sarcastic or are you actually agreeing that, for once I am right, and that he is judging Gomez and not putting a judgement on Diame even though Gomez plays less.[/quote][/size][/i]
Err, have a guess, dipshyt. :roll: [/quote]
Ok but I am right in what I am saying. I was just going to tell you that I actually thought your post on the other thread was funny then :)
Thanks Garswood ;)
You @rsehole, he said MY post was funny.
Thick, as well as annoying and dull.[/quote]
haha I did know that to be honest… but he could be on about my post as he didn’t say which one made me smile.
who are the good signings martinez has made ?
scotland and gomez are useless – sinclair is that good he never plays him,amaya never seen and reports now that he will be offered for another chump from swansea – henry was already a done deal ,time will tell how good the other 2 mccarthy and diame turn out so thats 2 that may or may not turn out to be good signings.
not a good record so far
Do you watch wigan? You have got Thomas’ first name wrong. How
can time tell how good Diame is when you’re already judging Gomez as rubbish, Diame plays every game when fit, what your saying doesn’t make any sense. Maybe he hasn’t made lots of good signings but Diame’s good enough[/quote][/size][/i]Yeah, come on Loudmouth – explain yourself, dipsh*t ;) [/quote]
you being sarcastic or are you actually agreeing that, for once I am right, and that he is judging Gomez and not putting a judgement on Diame even though Gomez plays less.
Right for starters, your post was, itself, childish. On that note I will say due to my age I am more within my rights to be childish than you. :)
You don’t seriously think I post ANYTHING simply for your benefit, do you?
I post to amuse myself, and therefore I will decide what amuses me.
Now, haven’t you got an on-line Old Maid or Snap! school to go to?[/quote]
Ill do you in another argument now, WHEN have I EVER said that you post anything for my benefit…Never!
Thanks Garswood ;)
Once again, child, your opinion is noted – yet ignored.Oh, what’s that Griff, Your’e not replying to be anymore have you said in the past? im sure you just have, yep yep you have ;)
Right for starters, your post was, itself, childish. On that note I will say due to my age I am more within my rights to be childish than you. :)
Extract from an article about injuries picked up at the weekend:-Martinez, meanwhile, has received positive news about the injuries suffered by Paul Scharner and Mario Melchiot in the weekend victory over Wolves.
“The inflammation from Mario’s nose has gone down and Paul’s knee has reacted very well,” he added.
Not sure why Scharner’s knee should be getting all excited about Mario’s nose getting better. It’s nowt to do with it. It would be better off concentrating on its own recovery :?
Not funny? Pointless post? Yeah ;)
who are the good signings martinez has made ?scotland and gomez are useless – sinclair is that good he never plays him,amaya never seen and reports now that he will be offered for another chump from swansea – henry was already a done deal ,time will tell how good the other 2 mccarthy and diame turn out so thats 2 that may or may not turn out to be good signings.
not a good record so far
Do you watch wigan? You have got Thomas’ first name wrong. How
can time tell how good Diame is when you’re already judging Gomez as crap, Diame plays every game when fit, what your saying doesn’t make any sense. Maybe he hasn’t made lots of good signings but Diame’s good enoughHow we he have a bigger payday? If someone was buying the club and the stadium was in Whelans ownership, they would have to buy that of him meaning he still got money for it?? You make no sense and you are pessimistic :)
Whelan can only get his money back if he sells Latics on at a decent price. To do that we need to maintain our Premiership status, Championship at the very least, and own our stadium.
It would be a hard sell if Latics didn’t have any foundations in place, I also doubt Whelan wants to be left with a multi-million pound stadium on his hands.[/quote]
He wouldn’t be left with it in his hands, the people who buy us would buy that aswell, your making no sense.
My spelling does make sense by the way thattwoyears, I just put ‘we’ by accident instead of ‘will’, and get a life instead of spotting petty spelling mistakes. ;)Yeah and he isn’t really any good, and didn’t play ‘superb’ last season either. Oh and yeah let’s sign another player who goes AWOL. ;)
How we he have a bigger payday? If someone was buying the club and the stadium was in Whelans ownership, they would have to buy that of him meaning he still got money for it?? You make no sense and you are pessimistic :)
Maybe I’m getting old, but that just sounds like a load of reverb and noise to me.What’s the point in that Mama Cass effort in the middle?
Heather off Eastenders? :lol:
Makes ‘Josh and his free text band’ sound fantastic, ffs!
English please?
Actually I would like to know what your talking about I dont get ANY of that, Just that one of them is a fat bird.I know Valencia was good for getting back and helping out but lots of midfielders dont do that, and a right back should be good enough to deal with situations, which Mario Melchiot clearly isn’t.
I also do think N’zogbia is a lot more threatening than Valencia and N’zogbia ‘on his day’ gives the team a lot more than Valencia did on a good day.”Bobby has had very little transfer window to work with. How can we be judging him at all”I take your general point, but Bobby had nigh on 3 months of a transfer window to make signings. he’s made some alright ones & some whale ones so far. Just like Bruce
Bruce turned a very poor side, conceding goals left right & centre into a half decent one before the transfer window. When that month long transfer window had come & gone he’d made decent enough signings (along with coaching appointments) to turn the side into one which had top 8 form.
In roughly an equal amount of time (IMO) Bobby has done a poorer jobI can only judge Bobby on what I’ve seen so far & for the most part that has been poor – from tactics, to formations, to team selection, to substitutions, to performances with just the odd glimpse (Villa, Chelsea, last week etc..) that when they click they can produce somet pretty good
Yes its probably wrong to compare a guy in post for 7 months with one who was in post for 20 months but to say “how can we judge him at all” is a load of rubbish IMO
Agree with all of that Tyldesley. But the part where your judging him about subs and tactics etc, It’s his desicion and he is probably better at it than us as, like I said before, we are not premiership managers, although I did get Wolves to win the prem in just 2 seasons after starting in the championship on LMA 2005. :D
