Whilst you are basically spot on egg lad things can still change with tactics. I’m sure Lowe and Moore would show a lot more if they were playing a more attacking style like they would have albeit in league 1. I’m convinced it’s our negative approach to forward play as opposed to the squad quality that’s hindering us at present. I think we could be pleasantly surprised if Cookie was a bit more adventurous in our style.[/quote]

We’ll not get many goals from Moore playing him like we do. There’s nobody playing off him and we don’t whip crosses in from either wing for him to get on the end of. He just ends up tussling with centre backs?
Lowe should play through the middle for me, utilise his pace.

We’ve got competition.. Think our pie looks better though :dry:

Loons to launch Bridie the Mascot

I’d never have guessed Egg…[/quote]

I don’t hide it lol.[/quote]

You have had your hub caps stolen haven’t you egg lad.[/quote]

I’d never have guessed Egg…

If I could chose between Powell and Morsy, it would be Powell any day.7
Players like Morsy are 10 a penny at our level, Powell on the other hand is gifted and a potential match winner for every minute he is on the pitch.
We might not get 90 minutes week in week out, but he is the type of player we need and can be worth the entrance fee alone.[/quote]

Opposite for me horc, Morsy would be a big miss. He does a lot of work in midfield that goes unnoticed.
Powell can go for me, tell me what match changing moments he did for us in his last ten games?
Young Sharpy fooked up big time not taking 10m from Brighton.
The word Judas springs to mind with Powell. He’s took the piss out of a club who’s looked after him like no other will..

Bees

This net spend argument of the Mousers is very subjective – last summer Klopp spent £161,550,000 & recouped £33,500,000 so his net spend alone last season was £128,050,000. From the stats I found online last summer Guardiola spent £63,720,000 & sold £70,050,000 of players so in the same period he had a net spend of -£6,330,000

Liverpool’s net spend in the whole time Klopp has been here are skewed by the fact that they got £142mill for 1 player which equates for half their total sales. I heard Scousers banging on last week on TalkSport that what Klopp has achieved was greater than Guardiola this season coz they’ve spent next to nothing compared to City, almost as if he’s had his team ripped apart in order to fund new signings but it simply isn’t true. The vast majority of the rest of their sales is also skewed by the fact that, at will, they seem to be able to rip off Crystal Pace & Bournemouth for their squad players (Benteke, Ibe, Solanke & Sakho) to the tune of a combined figure of almost £90mill. No-one they’ve sold since Klopp arrived other than Coutinho has been anything more than a squad player

Both are clearly great managers who are able to motivate their players to a hell of a level – in some respects, as much as I hate City I see what they did this season as a greater achievement than Liverpool (in the league) as aside from the obvious i.e. winning it, to be put under the pressure that they were by Liverpool & not to crack takes some doing[/quote]

To look soley at the last twelve months spend of city and Liverpool is subjective in itself. And why are city in trouble with the football authorities?
All clubs buy and sell, it business. And a lot of clubs pay over the odds for some bang average players which isn’t the fault of the selling club?

Net spend is around 90m for Klopp egg. Figure you mention above is very similar to that of Jose’s total spend.
No comparison between the style of footy each of them play. Most utd fans I know are not sorry he’s gone.