Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Could be quite feasible that his head has been turned by said move
That’s it if he is injured I think they would say. Maybe not before the possible move but they can do now.
I’m not too fussed about the “word from the club” stuff. Businesses (which is what it is these days) don’t involve their stakeholders in everything that goes on.
No mention of an injury so most likely he hasn’t been “with it” since coming back from Milan. Tomorrow will be a big indicator of why he wasn’t picked because I don’t think Pearce will get the nod. Then again, I’ve give in trying to second guess team selections.
Is he?
So who of our other players are attracting the same attention Robinson apart as Joffey.[/quote]
Well during the window we actually received offers for other players. Nobody came in for Joffy despite loads of rumours and terrace talk.
He’s a great player and probably will go on to be a star but I don’t think we can definitively say he’s our best right now. Most talented…possibly, but he has plenty of flaws in his game due to his age.
Yep ref lost us it Sat, what a comical pmsl remark that’s is.
It had nothing to do with:
Starting with 5 at the back,
3 defensive/holding midfielders,
Bringing Moore off leaving Lowe on,
Yep refs fault that. If Cook spent as much time in trying to rectify the sh1te he created as he did arguing with the 4th official we “might” have nicked a point.
But, that’s what sh1t clueless managers do and fans wearing Elton John rose tinted specs,point the finger elsewhere like a naughty child “Its not me its him !!!!”
Rightly or wrongly we started 5 at the back and they still had acres of space in and around our box and Pearson had all the time in the world. I dread to think what that would have looked like with 1 less defender and an extra attacker.
We had plenty of attacking positions but did nothing with them until Joffy and Jacobs came on. Whether that was because they changed the game or because they were 2 up and realised we wouldn’t get 2 if we played all day.
Playing 5 at the back, playing the useless Lowe and any other team selection complaint is not why we failed to string 2 passes together for an hour nor is it why they scored the goals they did. As Mutty says the 2nd goal was poor tracking back from Lowe but they still waltzed through FIVE defenders. Not sure how the blame for that can be thrown at Cooks door but then again with some he gets the blame for storm ciara.
He has plenty of faults though no doubt about that
Is he?
I used to like the pea supper pie but they got rid. All that was missing was a barm
I’ve been cautious about Joffy but he was excellent yesterday
It’s no wonder we are where we are in the table. We mustn’t spend anytime training everyone is just fighting with Cook
Very valid points cupwinners and I agree regards Evans. Whilst Alex Neil might have been glad to see Moore go off, he was still blowing out his backside.
Gelhardt definitely changed the game when he came on and was unlucky with his effort late on. Cook said in his post match that he has a big role to play between now and the end so hopefully we see more of him.
It’s between us and Charlton I think.
Oh – and not a chance Neil Warnock will come here.
9835
Agreed Roy. Garner is our only actual goal scorer IMO
Another young lad given far too much far too soon
Lowe was supposed to be playing with Moore but he is absolute dogshit. How he stayed on for the 90 I don’t know.
Oh yeah……and Windass nets on debut
Playing in the number 10 position behind the striker. Now why as our player is he not playing there for us or why did Clown not play him there at all this season?[/quote]
Played there plenty of times but he and his dad think hes a number 9
-
AuthorPosts


