TyldesleyLatic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,206 through 2,220 (of 2,587 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Alcaraz #38718

    “Yes I saw him make a few small errors early on but the pitch was very slick”

    To be fair, what I saw weren’t small errors & I think even the pundit on with the commentator said somet along the lines of “you know its your day when you make 2 almighty errors like that & the ball drops straight to the feet of one of your team mates”
    With the missed header the ball wasn’t even on the ground so I don’t see how it could blamed on a slick pitch!!

    But like I said I saw 2 things in a very brief section of the game out of 4 games that country has played & I’m glad to have read that they seem to be the exception rather than the rule so I look forward to seeing him in a Latics shirt come August

    As a fully paid up member of the dark side, my argument with Bobby playing 4-5-1 last season was not that the formation “doesn’t work” nor do I believe that that was the argument of the other people who opposed Bobby using it.
    My argument then & now is that the formation can be used very successfully BUT that you have to have the players to enable you to play the system successfully.
    4-5-1 failed (by & large) for Latics last season because we did not have a striker capable of playing that lone striker role. Scotland wasn’t & never will be good enough for the top flight & Rodallega, whilst having the talent to make it in this league doesn’t have the attributes to play that role
    On top of that, we didn’t have anyone (with Bobby’s insistance of playing wingers on their opposite sides) to play down that left flank. Rodallega whilst good enough to operate as part of a 2 man forward line isn’t (& never will be!!) a left winger
    On top of that the creative hub of the side purchased by Bobby (Gomez) was not (& never will be) good enough for the English top flight
    So what Bobby wound up doing was playing several square pegs in several round holes
    & that is why it didn’t work – coz he didn;t have the personnel to play it

    Likewise, 4-4-2 failed for England not because the system doesn’t work but because Capello picked his squad based on who he thought were his best 23 players regardless of whether that gave him enough specialist cover in all 11 positions.
    As a result we wound up with central midfielders playing on the left wing, central midfielders playing on the right wing & no left wingers in the entire squad
    He also took players who were unfit – Barry & Lennon & players who aren’t good enough (Heskey, Carragher & Upson)
    Add all to that petulant players who didn’t like the conditions & positions they were put in to & that’s why England flopped. Its not because they played 4-4-2
    IMO he would have been better playing 4-5-1 coz when you looked at the squad that was the formation best suited to the players he’d taken with him

    Hopefully Bobby spends this close season siging players who fit the system & then it will hopefully be a success btu it won;t be because 4-5-1 is the best system to play regardless of who you have playing in it but because he’s bought players suited to that system. Last season he didn’t have those players

    Rant over

    in reply to: Alcaraz #38679

    I haven’t watched a great deal of Paraguay or the world cup in general but I caught about 20 minutes of the Italy v Paraguay game & saw a centre half come rushing out somewhere between the penalty area & the centre circle & make a wild swipe at the ball, completely slice it up in the air & luckily see it spoon up to his keeper.
    I then saw the same centre half come rushing out of his position to try & head the ball only he completely misjudged the flight of the ball & flew about 3 feet under it

    When I heard this was Alcaraz I thought “typical bloody Bobby signing” and turned off
    It was only the next day when I saw it was him who’d scored!!!

    So that’s my experience of him so far & I’m glad to say that its been completely contradicted by all the media reports & pundit comments I’ve seen since

    in reply to: Beckham for England manager! #38649

    Re stuart pearce – for me he has some plus points going for him:
    1) he’s English
    2) he’s passionate
    3) he’s patriotic

    we had that with keegan & it was a flop & I aint sure Pearce has got much more to offer than that

    in reply to: whelan wasting no time #38620

    It matters not a jot to the premier league whether the England side is successful or not. Nor does the failure of the England side reflect badly on the premier league – it supplies more of its players to the world cup than any other league across the world
    Its watched in more countries & by more people than any other league in the world. Some of the best players in the world ply their trade in it & over the last decade its provided more teams to the latter stages of the Champions league than any other league in Europe.
    People like the blokes who lived on a rubbish dump in Kenya from some documentary I caught at 4 in the morning when my baby daughter was awake the other week who claimed to support Arsenal & Chelsea couldn’t give a rats @ss whether the England team is successful – neither could anybody else in any other country or “emerging market” that the PL is trying to expand its tentacles into.
    Likewise the failure of England in the World Cup will have little or no effect on club’s ST sales or Sky’s viewing figures next season
    Also at present we have clubs in the top flight owned by Russian’s, American’s, Abu Dabians (??) and God knows where else – why should any of them care how the England national team does??
    Yet Dave Whelan is wanting to hand over control of the England team to this collection of people?? There’s plenty wrong with the FA but like most of the stuff that comes out of Mr Whelan’s mouth this proposal is nonsense

    in reply to: Beckham for England manager! #38617

    Griff – whilst I don’t think beckham would necessarily make a good England manager, I agree with No1’s point that you don’t have to have been a good club manager to be able to be a success as an international manager.

    The international game is littered with managers who have been put in charge with little or no managerial experience – Maradona being the latest one & have made a good job of it.
    Doesn’t mean they’ll make good club managers (look at the relative success Klinsman had with a dire German team as opposed to the flop he has been at club level so far).
    It may therefore, if Capello is sacked, for the FA to look outside of someone who has been or is a success at club level

    One thing that does need addressing is the England players attitude at international level. They get everything on a plate for them at club level & train for a couple of hours a day that they expect all their whims to be catered to at international level too – then they moan that Eriksson was too relaxed, McLaren was too pally & now Capello is too strict. Apparently Capello may be forced out by player power – if I was the FA I’d tell the mainstay of the England side that the common denominator over the last 10 years or so has been them so if anyone goes is them. This is the manager, this is how he runs things, if you don’t like it then do one

    in reply to: just a thought on kingson #38614

    IMO neither Kingson or Stojkovic are good enough for the premier league as has been shown in all their (admittedly few) games over the last couple of seasons
    A couple of half decent saves in the world cup doesn’t make a blind bit of difference to that IMO

    in reply to: Some England Rumours…. #38613

    i can’t believe that anybody is giving the excuse for Terry’s awful performance on Sunday as that he was playing on the right side of the centre half pairing as opposed to the left – not on here admittedly but I’ve heard & read it a few times in the last couple of days

    This is a bloke who’s paid over £100grand a week to be a centre half. It aint like asking a central midfielder to play on the left wing or owt – its still centre half. Playing on the right doesn’t excuse him completely misjudging the flight of the ball from that goal kick for the first goal.

    I do think Johnson is getting a bit more stick than he deserves for his performance on Sunday. Due to the absence of any wingers in that startign line up, both full backs were effectively acting as wingers & had a hell of a job to fulfill that role & act as defensive cover too. There were goals on Sunday when the German wingers were completely unmarked but that’s coz the full backs had had to drift in to the middle to cover that inept pair at centre half

    in reply to: whelan wasting no time #38553

    “but when talking about England I think he’s spot on”

    Why the hell should the premier league have any say in the running of our national side??
    The premier league is the biggest money grabbing organisation in the history of football that cares about nothing but profit. What positive input they could have on teh English national side is beyind me

    in reply to: Beckham for England manager! #38509

    Capello’s problem i think was that he started to panic in the build up to the world cup.
    We cruised through the qualifiers looking & playing confidently. he picked players who were in form & if during a game things weren’t quite going to plan he had the nouse to turn it round.
    Come preparation for the world cup & he starts to pick players he knows have done a job for him – regardless of their form, injuries or appearance record for their club & to top it off starts to try & beg “internationally retired” players to come back. I’ve heard plenty of “insiders” in the press stating that there were players left out of the squad who were the best in training amongst the 30 man squad but he chose to stick with what he knew & tell the likes of Adam Johnson that his turn will come in euro qualifying. Why??? If he was good enough then he should have gone to South Africa
    come the tournament & his ability to know what to do to change things round disappears & his system of play becomes too rigid. I’ve no problem with him sticking with 4-4-2 but if (like Bobby) it “his formation or nothing” to go to a world cup without any out & out left wingers is criminal

    That said, its not Capello’s fault that Rooney couldn;t trap a bag of cement during the entire tournament or that Terry & Upson forgot how to defend or that none of the team seemed capable of stringing more than 2 or 3 penetrating passes together

    in reply to: Marlon Kings Sent To Coventry #38250

    To change the subject somewhat from France & Marlon King but sticking with world cup predictions, I did an accumulator before the tournament on group winners.
    It would have been nailed on (well providing England win today & the US draw or lose) to bring in several hundred pounds but whilst in the bookies filling out the form I had second thoughts about putting Uruguay down to win that group & changed my pick to Mexico :cry:

    in reply to: central defensive partnership #36222
    How can anyone vote for King, did anyone see him against Mexico.

    Did you see everybody against Mexico??

    in reply to: Glazer’s looking at £1.1bn debt #36221

    When I made those comments yesterday I hadn’t read the report (still haven’t to be honest) but I saw a news article on it last night.

    Whilst I think there are big questions over the impartiality of the journalist & his findings and the intent with which he started his investigation, what he is basically saying is that the level of debt/loans the Glazers have taken out to buy various business interests (above & beyond United) is so high & the level of profitability of the companies (with the exception of United) is so low, that the only way they can meet repayments & the interest on those debts/loans is by taking profits from United as payments in kind & put them into the other firms, so that could technically put United up the kaiber

    Then again if United loses its success, profitibility will slide so its in their interests to keep them successful
    What the journalist also skipped over was that he used United as the big profit making part of their empire & how they’d have to use its profits to prop up the other parts BUT United also account for about 65% of the debt he was talking about
    So basically I think he was using figures that he thinks supports his argument for whipping up a scare story & ignoring, or keeping quiet the bits that didn’t fit in with his theory

    in reply to: The first game #36111

    Apparently you can only “request” to play away/home on certain dates as opposed to insist on it so even though the rugby are at home on the Friday there is always the chance that the fixtures computer will chuck out a home game for Latics

    As long as the Blackpool away game avoids around the time my wife’s due to give birth (2 weeks either side writes off September) then I aint @r$ed who we get

    in reply to: Springfield Park or Robin Park? #36110

    I’d have to agree with truelatic4eva in that alot of people view Springfield Park through some misty eyed romanticism.

    It was an absolute dump with poor views & even worse facilities. The atmosphere was never particularly great either coz you only had that very small pocket at the back making any sort of noise & even then it was all trapped under that low roof of the st Andrew’s side so if you were anywhere else in the ground you could barely hear it.
    It was allowed to decay over the years & by the end was embarrassing – was it Paul Parker who turned up to sign at Latics, took one look at the ground & said “I’m not playing here” & promptly got back in his car & f00ked off

    That said, it had its charm, history & it felt like home no matter how much of a dump it was

Viewing 15 posts - 2,206 through 2,220 (of 2,587 total)