Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
I have to say that I am becoming increasingly perplexed with Rosler’s team selections. I fail to see how playing McManaman at left-sided wing-back/midfield or whatever that position was and Cowie wide right makes any sense at all.
And what’s happened to Perch? Is he another player that’s fallen foul of Rosler?
Just am quick un for both peps the linesman never gave the decision but the referee from way behind playNope didn’t get any of that.
Are you doing this on purpose or are you pissed?
Belting game Imo anyone think callum just over did the diving bit as it clearly was and after Kiernan swung an (just for philyis) lazy leg at a ball which went through to Rodders Barnett had to make the challenge and from where I was sat defo penaltyWas it in any doubt?
Roger … Great goal, excellent assist, not bad for a headless chicken?
Kiernan … Keep reading he’s going to be a good one.. Love to know exactly what they base that opinion on?Espinoza played very well today and took his goal well, too. Get you rose tinted specs off though, he dropped a few bollocks as well. ;)
Fortune was MOM by a street in my opinion. Forshaw decent. Nothing much to say about any of the others.[/quote]
You must mean that sublime “bollock” of a pass that Maloney scored from, whenever Espinoza make a mistake or gives the ball away he chases it down keeps going until he either wins it back or the pressure he creates allows someone else to do so, I wish golden boy McMananan did the same, he just stands there with his hands on his hips moaning while Roger and others clear his mess up.[/quote]
McManaman will never be midfiled player as long as he has a hole in his arse so there’s no comparison. Quite why Rosler keeps playing him as one is a completely mystery. Every tackle he makes is a potential red card.
I must be seeing something different than some, thought Cowie was our MOM, closely followed by Fortune.Forshaw just needs some consistency, so does Tavs. The central defenders were both woeful and should not see any further first team action for a while, one forced due to 3 match ban, the other is a no brainer.
Not sure who should play alongside Ramis on Tuesday, but would put Maloney in there before Kiernan. :woohoo:I think you are. Fortune yes, but please explain why you thought Cowie was MOM today.
To stand out in our current midfield can’t be all that difficult and to single him out would be unfair. I mean, if Roger is turning out to be our best mid-field player then it doesn’t say much about the rest.And another thing, isn’t it only a one match ban for a professional foul?
what’s happent to Jay not seen an post from him for yonks
It’s ‘a post’ not ‘an post’ Basic grammar that even my 6 year old can grasp![/quote]
Happent his grammar doesn’t mind being grasped by a six year-old. :)
A similar story really; I went to Macclesfield back in the late sixties with a mate of mine and at full time, after an inept performance and losing, I was persuaded by my “mate” to tell Mr McNeill, as he was leaving the pitch, to go back to Ross County. He stood and stared at me without saying a word which was a pretty scary moment for a young teenage me. If looks could kill and all that…!
I doubt he remembers that after 40-odd years but I offer my apologies anyway. :blush:
There’s only one way to pronounce Beauchamp and there ain’t no beach in there. It’s currently lying second in rubbish seaside attempts (1st is C Weed, 3rd is Sammy Salt). You should’ve saved Chris Beech for tomorrow’s footballers that sound like trees, flora and fauna thread.Whoa! Just a friggin minute here. Sammy Salt is no figment of anyone imagination and there’s a money in my wallet if someone wants to take me up on this!
Tim Breaker
(Sammmy Salt and C Weed are rubbish ;))
Not made up. Sammy Salt is a bona fide ex-Latics player. :P[/quote]
Well, how would I know. I’m a United fan[/quote]
This was way before that. You were probably still in nappies back then! B)
Tim Breaker(Sammmy Salt and C Weed are rubbish ;))
Not made up. Sammy Salt is a bona fide ex-Latics player. :P
