Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
We concede some very soft goals away from home. Cut those out and we have half a chance.
Being I’m back at work tonight with all the Rovers supporters and couldn’t make it last night I’d be interested in posters views on Rovers and particularly Dack.Personally I thought they were the prime example of a 1 man team. Everything had to go through him, we kept him quiet and they had nothing else. I’d still take him tomorrow though if he was on the market.
As for us, we managed to put one of our chances away in the first half yesterday which we didn’t do on Saturday which allowed us to dictate the pace of the game. Good to see us going forward at 2-1 as well as I actually thought we could have tried to sit back.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:pinch:
We would all love to stop a losing run with a win, but life isnt that simple. The important thing is we stopped the losing run and kept a clean sheet which considering the piss poor goals we have been conceding is another bonus.
As GL said, if we had conceded late on then this board would have been full of posts claiming we should have played for the draw.
Jesus, your one positive fooker,don’t try to score we might lose ?? Wtf kinda statement is that ?.
Reading were poor, we were on top then we suddenly start slowing it down in the hope we get a point ? That’s exactly how teams go down trying to defend draws.Did you not stop to think that Reading were dropping in looking for a point ?.
This is why if the very strong rumours0 that are flying around are true Cook’s successor is been lined up to takeover[/quote]And I could say that you’re one negative fooker but anyone who reads your posts can see that.
We have lost the last 4 before yesterday, created very little and given away soft goals. Yesterday we drew the game, created plenty and kept a clean sheet. Surely that must be a positive?
Losing matches gets you relegated and until yesterday that is exactly what we have been doing. Had you offered me 0-0 at kick off I’d have taken it. Losing run ended, bit of confidence at the back. Jobs a gooden.
Course it would. This board comes alive when we lose.
We would all love to stop a losing run with a win, but life isnt that simple. The important thing is we stopped the losing run and kept a clean sheet which considering the piss poor goals we have been conceding is another bonus.
As GL said, if we had conceded late on then this board would have been full of posts claiming we should have played for the draw.
After 4 straight defeats and some pretty poor defending I’m quite happy with a clean sheet and a draw. We’ve stopped the rot and now we can hopefully kick on on Wednesday night.
We might well lose him if they are DUBLIN his wages. We’ll KERRY on as usual of coursw but we’ll have lost a CORKer
Code
I reckon Cook has about 3 games to stop the rot before talk of the sack starts to spread!Utter nonsense, and a big problem in the game at the moment.
How do Scottish lads help England?
Paul Scharner is definitely better than Chey Dunkley or Cedric Kipre and Antolin Alcaraz is better than them 3 and Dan Burn.
Exactly Goole.
And come on Donny. Who would you drop from our FA Cup XI that had ONE English player in it.
Take away the likes of Aguero, Silva, De Bryune, Hazard, De Gea, Pogba, Salah, Mane, Firminio, Eriksen, Van Dijk.
No one wants to take away the above players, just limit the amount that clubs are allowed to play in a match.[/quote]
And you think all those players would hang around to sit on the bench?
Robles
Boyce
Scharner
Alcaraz
Espinoza
Kone
GomezWho do you drop from that? And that isn’t including McArthur, McCarthy or Maloney.
Salary capping does the same thing too. It wont make Southampton as good as City, it will just make City as shit as Southampton.
England are doing OK at the minute so let’s not look for ways to change the game.
-
AuthorPosts


