TyldesleyLatic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 2,587 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LAST NIGHTS OFFICIAL/ANNOUNCED CROWD #130857

    The east stand holds 8000 when full & the west stand 6000. With the 2 end stands somet like 5500.
    I reckon there were about 1k-1.5k spare seats in the west stand with a similar number spare in the east, so 11k at a conservative estimate in those 2.
    Probably around 3k from QPR takes it up to 14k & no more than 500-1000 in the south stand.
    So I don’t think it will have been far off the figure that was given out

    in reply to: LATICS PLAYERS WITH NAMESAKES #130788
    Bryan Griffiths, Lee Griffiths,Gareth Griffiths, there may be more.

    Seem to remember us having a Brian Griffiths too, possibly whilst Bryan was still here n’all

    in reply to: cut off #130772

    I’m pretty certain that the offer of free transport has to be taken up by some point tomorrow – presumably to allow them to confirm numbers with the coach company

    in reply to: FA Commission Report #130756

    Nothing illustrates more the point I made yesterday about the premier league looking after themselves & the FA looking after them in all this than the no non-EU players outside the top flight recommendation – Let more English players get experience of playing competitive football but they sure as hell aren’t gonna allow it risking the success & marketability of the top flight.

    Basically all their recommendations have a negative impact on all clubs in England – except those in the top flight!!

    And the B team league is a load of $h!te n’all. England has a completely different structure to its game than the likes of Germany & Spain
    And Germany hasn’t won a few world cups coz its top flight reserve teams played in a part time regional league, they won them coz they have a better coaching & scouting systems & the wealth in the game is more evenly distributed creating a more competitive professional game.
    Allowing Arsenal’s B team to play Alfreton Town & co is not gonna do anything other than stifle the clubs in that league (who i assume will not be allowed promotion unless they win that division) which is unlikely to happen so a glass ceiling will be in place killing off interest at that level

    in reply to: Team for first leg #130755
    Did Kiernan play at Brentford last season?

    If so then he’ll be one of a few who actually have experience.

    No – he played at Brenford for a time but he’d come back by mid February

    in reply to: Team for first leg #130749
    For me he choses between kiernan and roger to go 3-4-3 or 4-3-3

    Carson
    perch boyce ramis kienan/roger beau
    mac jordi

    macman waghorn maloney

    dont rule out caldwell for ramis though.

    Rosler was talking earlier in the week about hpw vital it was having players with big game experience in relegation deciders & cup finals/semi’s so I can’t see him going for Kiernan
    Roger I think would be more likely but having just come back from a hernia I don’t think he’d have given him the full 90 last week if he was gonna start with him on Friday. Same with Caldwell

    in reply to: Team for first leg #130747
    That’s a well-reasoned choice.

    I just wonder if Uwe will start with a more defensive player – McEachran perhaps – alongside McArthur. In that case, he would have to omit McManaman or Maloney.

    But that would reduce our limited goal power still further. And away goals don’t count.

    Its an option & was one he used at Wembley, but I just think the fact that he didn’t start with either McManaman or Maloney last week, both of whom are being managed as they come back from injury problems indicates that he’ll start with both of em, maybe with Maloney operating in a more central role off the forwards – “in the hole” as they like to call it.
    If QPR sit back like I expect them to he’ll need players who can stretch & pull their defence about to create space for others to exploit & both McManaman & Maloney can do that. I don’t think thats one of Waghorn’s strengths & he appears to me to be more of a grafter
    But for me last week’s line up, or more the ommissions, are a strong indicator of the team for tomorrow

    In all honesty, I’m not expecting the greatest game tomorrow night

    in reply to: Team for first leg #130742

    Picking up on some of the things Rosler has said, such as the tie not being won or lost in the first leg, I think that he’s going to be relatively cautious tomorrow which I think will mean a set up like the Arsenal game where he played 3/5 (if you include wing backs) at the back.
    So with thinking that & looking at his previous few line ups to see who played & how much game tim ethey got I think that the team won’t be to dis-similar to this one:

    Carson
    Boyce Barnett Ramis
    Perch Beausejour
    McArthur Gomez
    McManaman Maloney
    Fortune

    From looking at his team last week i think that Perch, Boyce, Barnett, McArthur, Gomez, Beausejour, McManaman & Maloney (none of whom started last week) are shoe ins.
    He seems to have settled on Carson as his keeper & I think that Ramis was given 45 minutes against Blackburn just to check he was back fit
    So that gives 10 starters

    The only debate I can see is what forward he starts with. I think that he’ll go with Fortune coz he worked well in that role against Arsenal & whilst he can’t hit a cow’s @r$e with banjo in front of goal he can keep the opposition defence under pressure, win the ball when it’s cleared logn & hold it up to bring others into play. Waghorn for me is a better finisher but if there was one flaw with the Reading set up it was that when the ball got cleared logn to Waghorn he won nowt & it was just giving away possesion. I think a better team than reading on the day may have been able to exploit that.
    Another reason I think he may go for Fortune is that knowing Rosler’s fondness for rotation, Waghorn has started the last 3 games including last week’s – unless Waghorn has become one of the “irreplacables” like McArthur & Boyce

    Not saying its the team I’d go for but I think its what he’ll go with

    in reply to: Serious threat to non-league football #130719

    This is a case of the tail (the big clubs) wagging the dog (the FA).

    The real problem with the development of home grown players is that the big clubs use up their wealth to hoover up virtually all the promising young talent around and stick em in their Academies in the hope that a few of them will be able to succeed at the level they need them to & the rest they cast aside. In order to attract the young players who may be more interested in competitive, first team football lower down the league ladder at that age they offer them (in relative terms) big money contracts in order to turn their heads. They also bend the regulations to the limit – I remember John Deehan saying once at a fans forum that the club were finding it increasingly difficult to attract youth players. he mentionned some regulation that had been introduced (& which may still be in place) that a club could only sign up a youth player if they lived within a certain travelling distance of the club. he mentioned a big club who had used this to get players from all over the place over the heads of other more local clubs coz they could fly them there!!
    When the players get released from the big clubs they can often not have developed enough to be ready for first team football in the lower leagues (as they would have been in the past) & they can often sneer at what they see as the piffling wages on offer lower down the pyramid & they drift away from the game.
    On top of that owners (& fans) of these bigger clubs bigger clubs often want instant success & are unprepared to wait for these players to develop so big money is splashed out on already, ready players & the youngsters find their route to the first team coming increasingly congested, if not blocked completely & their own development as players gets stunted even further. Chelsea & Man City for example spend an absolute fortune on their Academy systems but they’ve produced almost nothing of note as the youth players aren’t getting the competitive game time needed & the owners want instant results & not a season or 2 for a couple of youngsters to bed in.
    Even those who bigger clubs deemed not up to makign the grade (thinking off the top of my head about players like David Platt & Robbie Savage released by Man United), were released at a young enough age that their development hadn’t been stunted, they were ready for lower league football, got the experience & moved back up the system. Nowadays the club’s keep hold of them longer & release some of the more promising ones at 21-23 by which point they’ve lost a good 3 years out of an estimated 12-14 year professional career. In the past the likes of Josh McEachran by 21 would have either been a first team regular at Chelsea or he’d have been released long ago, getting first team football at a club where he knew he wasn’t goign back to a bumper deal at a big club anyway & would be grafting to get back up to the top

    In the past, the spread of talent at youth level was far more evenly spread throughout the professional game & players such as those we had at Latics (Joe Parkinson, Peter Atherton & co) were able to get first team football at a young age, develop as players & then move up the system when they were ready.

    One player who i think has bucked the trend is James McCarthy. He had the chance to go to Liverpool or Arsenal at 16 & turned it down coz he knew he would get more first team football at Hamilton. When he felt he was ready for the next step he again turned down overtures from the big clubs & decided between Latics & Wolves where he felt he would get more first team chances. Again he could have moved from Latics but only did so when he felt he’d developed enough to be able to command a first team place at a “bigger” club. Had he taken the £££ signs being flashed in front of him at 16 I very much doubt that he’d be where he is today.

    Anyway, rather than addressing these issues, the big clubs want to carry on doing what they’re doing & this is their answer – & one that allows them to look like they only want to do it for the good of the English national side when it reality its purely self serving

    in reply to: Man City fined £50m #130695
    Will this money end up being distributed through the game, to the less well off clubs, the Exeters,the Torquays, the Hereford Towns???

    Or will it all end up with FIFA?????

    Technically its UEFA who is fining them!! ;)

    in reply to: Been Meaning To Ask This For Ages! #130681
    I think a deaf person would have a pretty good idea that something was amiss if everyone around them started to leg it ! Ha ha Garswood will know!

    What if they’d nodded off & woke up but thought everyone was getting up just coz it was half-time???

    in reply to: Been Meaning To Ask This For Ages! #130667

    if it turns red – leg it!!

    Don’t know for certain but I assume that its some form of visual alarm for people with a hearing impairment.
    There is a siren warning for emergencies & I know commercial buildings have to have a visual warning on smoke detectors for deaf people so maybe this is somet similar.
    Or it could be a visual warning to coppers & stewards to go on high alert without warning supporters
    or some drunken student could have nicked it from some roadworks on a night out, broke into the DW, left it & no-one has thought to shift it

    in reply to: Wasted oppurtunity at Rovers #130619

    With our main season over I’ve no problem with what Uwe did yesterday.
    Yesterday’s result was irrelevant to Latics but the next 2 (hopefully 3) games are the most vital of our season. Should he have played his first choice side (whatever that may be!!) & risked having some of those 11 unavailable for the play offs through injury or suspension?
    Personally I couldn’t care less about any respect or otherwise to any other club. What matters to me is Latics & that’s what Uwe is paid for too
    Burnley are in a completely different situation so it isn’t even comparable

    in reply to: Best ever goal #130589

    In terms of pure skill I’d go for Bobby’s goal v Scarborough in 1997. Still no idea how he did it
    Run close by Simon Haworth’s equaliser v Gillingham in the 2000 play off final. Best goal Wembley has ever seen.

    In terms of emotion & impact on Latics history. Ben Watson in last years cup final.
    2nd is Jason Roberts goal in the semi v Arsenal in 2006

    in reply to: Nick Powell: Hero to Zero #130580

    Yeah but to be fair, prior to us signing him, they were going on about David Wright as if he was one of the finest players ever to grace a football field.

    He wasn’t

Viewing 15 posts - 646 through 660 (of 2,587 total)