Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Just to add to my first post – as i said i feel pretty strongly about how the post keep doing stuff like this so i reported the article to the press complaints council and i have just recieved this reply.
Dear Mr Loudmouthblue
Thank you for your email.
Your complaint will now be passed to the Commission with a view to it making a ruling under the Code. We aim to be in touch with you with a decision within the next 50 days (35 working days).Complaints Officer Elizabeth Cobbe will now be dealing with this matter. Her email address is elizabeth.cobbe@pcc.org.uk and you should add her to your email safe list for further correspondence. Should you have any queries or require any further advice, please do not hesitate to contact her on 020 7831 0022.
A copy of the Code of Practice which all newspapers and magazines who subscribe adhere to, can be accessed using this web link: http://www.pcc.org.uk/cop/practice.html
I would like to set out a number of points about our procedures, for your information.
Speed: The Commission has a commitment to deal with all complaints as quickly as possible. It expects both complainants and newspapers – and their representatives, legal or otherwise – to cooperate with that commitment. Any unreasonable delay on either side may be taken into account by the Commission.
Transparency: As part of a full and fair investigation we must ensure that each party to a complaint is able to see and comment upon what the other has to say. The Commission cannot take into account information to which both sides have not had an opportunity to comment.
Confidentiality: The system of self regulation overseen by the PCC requires good faith on both sides. In order for the PCC to be able to investigate complaints effectively, it is essential that neither party to a complaint, complainant or newspaper/magazine, publishes information which has been provided as part of the investigation – most notably correspondence – without the consent of the other party. Publication, without consent, may affect the PCC’s ability to continue to deal with a complaint or may be considered by the PCC when it reaches a decision as to whether the Code has been breached. Material provided by both complainants and publications during a PCC investigation must only be used for the purpose of the complaint being considered by the PCC.
Commission rulings: It is possible that the Commission may find that your complaint does not amount to a breach of the Code, or that any remedial action taken or offered by the publication is sufficient under its terms. If this is the case we will explain to you why the Commission took this decision.
Correspondence with the editor: We will usually send a copy of each letter of complaint to the editor even if the complaint does not raise a breach of the Code. Similarly, any substantive decision made by the Commission under the terms of the Code will be sent to the editor.
Outside the Commission’s remit: The Commission is not able to deal with all complaints. Some of the circumstances in which we may not be able to pursue a complaint are set out on our website.
Legal proceedings: The Commission cannot deal with any complaint which is the subject of legal or other associated proceedings. You should let us know immediately if you decide to take legal action in regard to the matter under complaint.
Data Protection: By pursuing the complaint, you consent to the processing of any personal data which may be provided to the Commission for the purposes of dealing with your complaint. You also consent to the publication of the Commission’s decision in relation to the complaint, but may withdraw consent in writing.
Independent Reviewer: If, at the end of the process, you are dissatisfied with the manner in which your complaint has been handled, you should write within one month to the Independent Reviewer who will investigate the matter and report any findings and recommendations to the Commission. Further details are included in the enclosed How to Complain booklet, or via the following link: http://www.pcc.org.uk/about/whoswho/ind … eview.html
Further information about the complaints process can be accessed using this web link: http://www.pcc.org.uk/complaints/process.htmlInformation about our service commitments to complainants can be accessed using this web link: http://www.pcc.org.uk/complaint/charter.html.
Further information about the PCC can be found on our website http://www.pcc.org.uk .
Do not hesitate to contact me if you need further advice. When you write to us, please quote our reference number on this email.
Yours sincerely
Simon Yip
AdministratorPress Complaints Commission
Halton House
20/23 Holborn
London EC1N 2JDTel: 020 7831 0022
Website: http://www.pcc.org.ukGood work LMB, That should pee them off
a punt on young striker from one of the top clubs I reckon.
Like Di Santo?[/quote]
But he had had a full season in the premiership and failed at Blackburn, We knew he was bad in front of goal before he was signed. I think he is on about a loan striker like a Vela, Welbeck or Frazier Campbell. Obviously not those players because they had their bow last season. I think i would prefer to sign one rather than loan one, Remember all the trouble with Zaki.
Garswood they are cracking
you are a bugger though i wanted to copy and paste them. I have a collection of latics photos i am enlarging to go around the walls of a snooker room in the future and they would have been ideal. Half latics and half warriors with some fools and horses in the middle.
Don’t try jokes, Duke. Stick to rubbish football opinionsGriff you seem to be getting very cynical of late, Not like your usual self. The jovial, pedantic and sarcastic one we all know. Are you feeling ok. Would you like a hug. :( :(
And a cup of tea of course
Ali Dia has a good page on wikipedia, it’s quite interesting to read. In particular when he was signed by Gateshead brought on as sub and then subbed 11 minutes later :lol: :lol: :lol:
Alessandro Zarelli was another fake, There is a video of him on youtube, He did all the paperwork to get him loan moves to Ireland and Wales and even Sheff Wed i think and he belonged to nobody but managed to convince these clubs he was i think a Juventus youth player.I saw a programme on him once and it was funny to watch.
Who was the Hungarian who played in a pre season friendly against Everton at the JJB. He scored in a 6-1 defeat, can’t remember if he put us a goal up early on or scored a late consolation. He looked half decent but never really saw him again.Gabor Bukran – Had him on trail after he was released from Walsall
Here’s one, Our very own Ben Kay. Was being raved about in the local rags for a few seasons and now playing for Robin Park i believe.
Duke, West Ham were in an ere of bad players then, They also signed Hugo Porfillio, Florin Radicoiu and Paulo Futre, Forgive the spelling it was a while ago. But they signed some shockers in Redknapp’s early days.
Like I said, I was righter than himDo not to try and take Griff on, He will always dry bum you :? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Duke im glad you agree, i like a couple of your choices, in particular Dong and Marlet. Ali Dia was a funny story, Even funnier because Souness was taken in by him. Surely he must have known in training he was dump.
Griff, come on bud, give us a player, and you Standish. There must be a few players in there.
Christopher Wreh
Arsenal signing from Monaco, Came with bags of potential at the same time Anelka was signed, played for them for 3 seasons from 1997-200 playing 28 times and scoring 3 goals. Still an international striker for Liberia and George Weah’s cousin, Had loan stints at Birmingham and AEK Athens, Most recently been playing for the likes of Bishops Stortford and Buckingham Town in the Conference North and United Counties Leagues respectively.
Won the award for the best goal celebration ever for an Arsenal player.
Was thinking the same but there has not been much to debate about recently
…………………or complain about :shock: :shock: :shock:
You could have waited a bit longerand delayed moaning until July at leastmiserable gits
What’s the matter with you now. What have we said against Wigan Athletic or anybody connected with them. You could have waited until :teasing-blah: July before you started moaning about the possibility of people saying anything against them.
Golborne? On the way to Milton Keynes? :think:
Why Milton Keynes ??
[/i][/size]
Yosser was working there until recently, apparently.[/quote]Bletchley, Luton and Reading[/quote][/i][/size]
Are you a bus driver? :?:P [/quote]
Wrong transport :? :?
This is getting like Guess Who
Golborne? On the way to Milton Keynes? :think:
Why Milton Keynes ??
[/i][/size]
Yosser was working there until recently, apparently.[/quote]Bletchley, Luton and Reading
Come on Griff, its just an observation. Got to admit its strange how those fixtures have come out.
[/i][/size]
It’s not strange at all. Believe me, I know – I used to compile fixtures.You have an algorithm/model/formula, call it what you like, in which the fixture matrix is set up as AvB, CvD, etc home and away for all the weeks in the season.
Each team is then assigned a letter within that model. Teams can be ‘paired’ so that, for example, Liverpool and Everton are never at home at the same time.
Also, pairing might be applied to ensure that as few London teams are at home at the same time as possible, to satisfy policing requirements.
Some clubs that share stadiums with other teams/sports may also be allocated to a ‘letter’ which provides for that.
The more of the above types of restrictions or considerations that there are, the less ‘letters’ are available for the rest of the clubs that have no such restrictions. As a consequence, it is quite a difficuly balancing act that the authorities have to perform anf it is perfectly reaonable to excpect that some teams will have the same/similar position in the algorithm year on year.
So, it may look like a conspiracy but it most definitely is not.[/quote]
When i need to read something more than twice i decide that it cannot be deciphered :lol: :lol:
