Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 261 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spelling and grammar. #35578

    Is there not a golf forum somewhere that you two can carry on your dick measuring competition? :roll:

    in reply to: Swansea #34329
    Goin swansea for my mates 30th birthday party tomorrow should i wear my latics top ?

    go dressed as a sheep,guaranteed result ;)

    in reply to: transfer bored #34007

    Andy Griffin wouldn’t be a bad shout on a free, ideally as back up for another younger right back. Local lad and a bit more English backbone.

    Not sure about anyone from Paraguay. Harry Redknapp said that all Paraguayans are sh*t apart from Roque Santa Cruz and Harry is always right the Cockney whelk.

    in reply to: A game of spot the difference #32986
    So your biggest aspiration is survival? Maybe you’d be better off supporting someone else? Do you think it’s ok to trade off five tonkings for a victory over a top four club?

    No I aspire to see us winning the Premier League title, or failing that a nice run in the top half but the difference between me and you is that I understand that it is very unlikely to happen and anything finishing above the bottom three must be considered a success

    We have the lowest crowds, one of the lowest wage bills, £60m in debt, and running up massive losses year on year, which can only be prevented by selling players. We have no comparative history at this level – people comparing us to the likes of Blackburn and Bolton is even laughable they were a top flight club 120 years ago, they are bigger towns who have won major honours and have no rugby team competing for their money!

    When we first came up to the Premier League we expected to get tonked every week, the only thing that has changed in the above is that we are even more in debt and many of our fans have turned into the same Bertie Big times who exist at every other Premier League club. As I said at the beginning Roberto Martinez has achieved exactly what Jewell & Bruce did, to answer my own question when I started this thread – the difference is that the expectations of fans like you have changed and what was good enough under Jewell is apparently not good enough under Martinez

    I’ll be supporting us whatever division we are in pal, just like I always have. As the very sage Old Git put it, every year Little Wigan exist in this division they thumb their noses at the big boys. Long may it continue!

    in reply to: A game of spot the difference #32980

    Great minds and all that, NO1 fan ;)

    in reply to: A game of spot the difference #32979
    The answer to the original question in my opinion is because Martinez is the only manager out of the three to take us backwards. Jewell took us from the 2nd division upto the prem.
    Bruce took over us at the bottom and turned us into a mid table team who I believe would have been competing for European places this season had he been here.
    Whereas Martinez has turned a mid table team to a team who struggles to finish 16th in the poorest premier league there has ever been. He has turned one of the best defenses outside the top 4 into the 2nd worst.

    Bruce managed a whopping 17 points in the 2nd half of last season, relegation form by all accounts and subsequently left for a bigger club rather than continue working under the financial restrictions Latics have to operate

    We then sold two of the remaining best players in Cattermole & Valencia in the summer for £20m of which I doubt even half was made re-available to Roberto Martinez, who has continued to manage under the financial restrictions which Bruce didn’t want to.

    The target for the club is to avoid relegation each year, sorry if you don’t like that but it’s what Whelan said and he’s the chairman. Jewell achieved it, Bruce achieved it and Martinez achieved it.

    If you seriously believe that you have a right to demand that WAFC should be in mid table, then you’d probably be better off supporting another mid table club

    We can’t win in this league because as soon as we start to over-achieve and reach mid-table or get in the top half, our players get picked off by bigger clubs offering bigger wages. It’s nothing to do with who the manager is. It’s happened to Jewell (Bullard, Roberts), happened to Bruce (Palacios, Heskey, Valencia??) and will probably happen to Roberto (N’Zogbia, Rodallega)

    Staying up is our target and it is an achievement, what a shame some of you can’t acknowledge it.

    in reply to: A game of spot the difference #32831
    ”The three statements are exactly identical”

    The statements aren’t identical yes, but the route to which each manager is able to have that statement said about him is completely different.
    Those different routes are why 2 managers didn’t get slated (although Jewell took a hell of alot of stick in that 2nd season) & one is getting slated.
    Bloody hell its like if Latics beat a certain team every time they play them – you might have beaten em 10-0 on one occasion, 2-1 on another, 1-0 in the last minute with an own goal after playing against 7 men for 88 minutes in another game etc.. so why did the players get a standing ovation after the first game, polite applause after the 2nd game & stick after the last game??? The answer is in how each victory was achieved.
    It isn’t rocket science

    You asked a question as to why this is so & I’m giving you my reasons.
    “You couldn’t get three more similar circumstances and three more similar outcomes” – considering that in each of our 5 seasons in the top flight Latics have got differing numbers of points & finished in different positions in each of them, I’m afraid for the sakes of your argument we have had widely different outcomes beyond “staying up” – a statement which in itself comes nowhere near to describing how a team has performed over the course of a season

    But all that is your opinion, the fact ( key word ) is that all three managers kept us up under very difficult but similar circumstances.

    I’m not interested in the scorelines or what each manager did before or after.
    I made three statements each of which the first ten letters were the same, the only difference being how each manager was treated, all you seem to be saying is “well Jewell did this before that” or “Bruce did that afterwards” I am basically saying that Jewell kept us up 06/07, Bruce kept us up 07/08 & Martinez kept us up 09/10. That is generally regarded as a successful outcome for Wigan Athletic, even our own chairman says it. Two of them got respect for achieving it, the other got dog’s abuse.

    It is exactly the same achievement. If you’re now trying to say it’s different because there were different scorelines on different days then that is just splitting hairs. The facts are he’s done what is expected yet for some reason a certain section of our support has the opinion that it doesn’t seem to be enough

    Same goes for all these people saying we only stayed up because there were three worse teams than us, that’s pretty much how a league table works, I didn’t hear people saying Bruce only kept us up because Derby only got 11 points that season though?? He kept us up, just like the other two. Over 38 games he got enough points to keep us in this division just like Jewell and Bruce. No difference at all.

    in reply to: A game of spot the difference #32816
    The only problem with that being is that they are not identical scenarios. In fact they’re nowhere near identical – which was the point I was making

    I suggest you read what I initially posted again then. The three statements are exactly identical, the only difference is the name of the manager.

    All three managers kept us in the Premier League in very similar circumstances. They managed the same club did they not? They played mostly the same opposition did they not? They all worked with a tight budget and either had to sell their best players or had them sold before the arrived did they not?You couldn’t get three more similar circumstances and three more similar outcomes.

    So why the difference? Why do two of them get thanked for keeping us in the Premier League and the other gets abuse and criticism and told by the great minds on here (sic) that he is not up to the job?

    in reply to: A game of spot the difference #32814
    ”I just asked for the difference between the above three identical scenarios”

    Martinez didn’t keep us up. Portsmouth, Burnley and Hull did.

    Jewell didn’t keep us up. Sheffield United, Charlton & Watford did.
    Bruce didn’t keep us up. Reading, Birmingham & Derby County did.

    Again I ask tell me the difference :?

    in reply to: A game of spot the difference #32804
    Steve Bruce did a damn site more than “keep Latics in the league”. he took over a team going nowhere but down, had turned it around within weeks & then had it playing with top 8 form in the latter half of the season. he then carried on where he left off the season before & had us challenging for Europe until our chairman started to dismantle his team & our season petered out

    Paul Jewell also did a damn site more than keep Latics in the premier league. he took the club up from division three to the top flight in 4 seasons, got us to a major cup final, finish tenth before he ran out of ideas & kept us up by teh skin of his teeth. He also wasn’t hero worshipped for that last bit & it was pretty much accepted that he’d come to the end of his time here

    Bobby has made a good defence into the worst in the division (& did so within months), makes the same mistakes again & again and talks about learning curves but seems to have learnt absolutely nowt from the start of this season to its end

    Thanks for the above however most of it is irrelevant. I just asked for the difference between the above three identical scenarios, no need for analysis of any other un-related events

    It’s good that you have admitted that Bobby inherited a dismantled team though ;)

    in reply to: May 3rd is a great day for Latics #31798
    I’ve never understood how you can have more than one club. What happens when they play each other? How can you give your heart and soul to two clubs?

    Read the two examples and learn. I’ll give you another more simple example if you’re struggling. I used to go watching St Pats as quite a few mates played for them. Lots of people there support St Pats and Wiggin Rugby. One is a big name Top Four club, one is non league club lower down the pyramid.

    I take it you’ll be nipping down to Clarington Park the next time they play to tell them they can’t do that in case they ever end up playing each other? :roll:

    in reply to: Fairytale finish to crazy season #31771

    It’s a good place to be in. If we win, we get to see Latics win at Stamford Bridge and yet again be on the lips of half a billion people worldwide. If we lose ( ideally gallantly or more likely down to some shocking reffingto have a good moan about ) then we get to see the title lifted again for the second time. Not by us and admittedly not much in it for us but part of football history all the same.

    in reply to: May 3rd is a great day for Latics #31769

    Vat69 – It was my first Latics game as well – an absolute cracker. After this Wigan were my team (shamed to say that I supported Man U up til this game and I still have a soft spot for them …. hope we beat Chelsea on Sunday !!!)

    Out they come :lol: [/quote]

    Out who come? If you are capable of adding up you will see that the two people concerned have watched Wigan Athletic for 25 years during which time they have been in the bottom division and bottom of the entire league. Hardly the actions of bandwagon jumpers.

    Growing up in Wigan in the 70s and 80s most people had a second team, that could either be United first and Wigan second or Wigan first or United second, it was hardly likely 25 years ago that they would ever play each other.It’s a pretty common concept if you understand football, which from the sounds of it you don’t.There are lads I know now who watch Utd, Everton etc but when they have no game they come down to the DW to watch Latics, they are football fans. Proper football fans who watch games in the flesh not on telly. Not the Sky fest armchair fans who sit in the pub with their United & Liverpool shirts on, the glory hunters who follow whoever is winning. If you have kids you will know that they change their minds a lot. Kids are easily influenced by other kids. The good news for all of us is that around 30-40% of the DW Stadium now is probably made up of kids who have only ever known success and Premier League football despite the claims that they are bandwagon jumpers

    I had you sussed out as a rugby clown a while ago. Every time you come on here to post snidey comments about Latics and our fans, I will give you a history lesson like this. I will put you on a lead like a little pet Chihuahua and lead you up the garden path. Grow up or get back to your own board. I await your clueless three word response :roll:

    in reply to: F.A.O. MUTTY #31588

    Just like his team and his sport, Mutty has a habit of turning up where no-one wants him and at best laughs at him :lol:

    in reply to: F.A.O. MUTTY #31580

    They seem to be touting themselves around every football ground in the country as a solution having failed in yet another area which plays the more popular code which RL fans so detest. I have no idea why these parasites can’t get their own stadia ( with the exception of those two proper RL towns Saints & Warrington of course ) and stop bothering other more successful sports. Sports that they continually slag off as being inferior, oh and by the way chaps, any chance we can borrow youre ground as we’ve none of our own around here

    Can you imagine Arsene Wenger’s reaction to the proposal that a seven match Rugby League tournament be played on the Emirates pitch? :D

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 261 total)