Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Love the broken record saved in the favourites of some on here, who love to post it after certain comments………………..Then spout the same stuff they’ve always spouted themselves!
TAXI for the broken record please. We all know bad management has resulted in where we are and the reluctance to pair a striker with Fortune, if we played a forward at all.
Do you not consider McClean to be a striker then?
Coyle, Rosler, Mackay and now Caldwell have all seemingly preferred McClean and Fortune to be their first choice strike force.
Bad management has resulted in where we are now because in the case of Rosler he was allowed pay good money for strikers who were no better and in my opinion worse than what was already here and after initially starting with them was reluctant to continue. Mackay was just a disastrous appointment on every level but again he also didn’t consider anyone else to be a better option than McClean and Fortune.
But of course you watching a game once a fortnight do know better.
They’ll decide whether to appeal after their next two games, by which case they will probably be back on 44 points by 10pm on Tuesday after they turn over a Reading side who have nothing to play for.Chances of Wigan or Millwall being on 41 points by then….slim considering their next opponents.
You’re a closet Latics fan really aren’t you Mutty. I think it’s time you came out.
Yip the old record thing. But Yokey Mon it precisely idiotic tactics like that that have put us in this shit and we have every right to go on about it until some one comes along and stops these relegation making decisions of which we have had more than a lifetimes worth of this season. Just keep your shell together Yokey!Well someone else has comes along and he also seems to believe the strongest striker option we have includes Fortune and/or McClean, which doesn’t say much about the alternatives.
Maybe you should have applied for the job so you could see first hand how equally poor or worse the other options really are. Or maybe there’s a conspiracy going on to get us relegated and the manager is under instructions to deliberately play the most ineffective players just to piss you off.
Story of the season for the club.
Did Fortune play up top on his own? ;)
Not that I wish the man dead of course but I wonder if his epitaph will read “sadly missed”.[/quote]
I am certainly glad he came on on Saturday, he did great to get that cross in for the winner.[/quote]
Me too and I don’t think any other player we have possesses the kind of strength he showed to get to the line and put in that cross.
Story of the season for the club.Did Fortune play up top on his own? ;)
Not that I wish the man dead of course but I wonder if his epitaph will read “sadly missed”.
Example; we lose to Spurs 8-1 and his first comment is that we can take positives from the game.
If only it had been 8-1 then I suppose that would have been a positive.
Had to laugh at the goal announcer ” born in billinge hospital, tim chow ” classA rather weak claim to fame and there’s nowhere to put the blue plaque.
Regardless of what happens to Rotherham there’s still the small matter of having to finish above Millwall who have three points more than us and a game in hand.
But how impressive would Adam Forshaw be in a team full of Adam Forshaws, or Ben Watson in a team full of Ben Watsons?
It doesn’t matter who played tonight or all season really.
The rot started when we failed to secure promotion last season. A mixture of ex-Premier League players who didn’t want to be here plus expensive run of the mill signings who were just not good enough and a few journeymen at the end of their careers was a disaster waiting to happen.
All that was needed to ensure the disaster was a nailed on certainty was to appoint a manager with a pretty damning FA charge hanging over him and then make the situation even worse by attempting to defend the indefensible.
Rank bad management and decision making of the highest order.
Whoever gives the armed forces the best equipment and they want for nothing gets my vote so i`m stuck.I’d be more inclined to vote for a party that chooses to make a stand by not sending young men and women to be maimed and killed for no good reason just to satisfy the interests of the elite pursuing their own political and economic agenda.
If they had lost the game then probably a fine. A possible outcome could be a three point deduction.
