Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Hull by far the best way to go, just costs a bomb .
And you have to travel through the night, apparently. Not that it will impact on me.[/quote]
Griff made a poo joke ! :cheer:[/quote]
Eh? Have you been drinking your dirty chamois water? :/[/quote]
Impact as in impacted feces ! ;)
Hull by far the best way to go, just costs a bomb .
And you have to travel through the night, apparently. Not that it will impact on me.[/quote]
Griff made a poo joke ! :cheer:
I am confident that Horc and Alasdair know more about WAFC and it’s history than you do Griff. They are WAFC fans personified ! Not sure who this Leylandlatic4ever is though, he aint one of our lot !
We can only speculate as to what he requested but we do know Whelan turned him down.
Do we…..????[/quote]
To be fair no we don’t and that is a glaring assumption on my behalf.
Sammy – I am all for people discussing past players & managers etc. but hoping the guy fails is pathetic.
I hope any one who is of that opinion loses their jobs under the same rationality.[/quote]
I remember you on a number of occasions wishing Steve Bruce all the best! ;)
The usual scapegoat is the referee. Coyle has already wrongly criticised the referee who dismissed McManaman, promising to appeal against the decision. Fortunately, wiser counsel prevailed.
Who made you judge, jury and executioner of refereeing decisions?
He was sent off on a point of opinion i.e that he had used excessive force in his tackle.
Anyone with half a brain can see he used the necessary force to make the tackle causing no danger to the other player and if you think its excessive or dangerous I would make the argument you are a bit soft.
The reason Coyle didn’t appeal is because red cards are only rescinded if there is a glaring error made in the decision.
So while the FA and the referee may have turned around and said after seeing the reply that it was a good tackle and didn’t deserve a red card but probably a yellow card at most as it could be judged as being a bit wreckless there is nothing they can do to overturn it.
But obviously you know best having googled the subject once and are now the cockney latic authority on all FA related matters.[/quote]
youll feel a right prat when you read all that back and try to put into the context of what WGTB actually said.
you must have googled the word prat and are now the cockneylatic authority on all things prattish.[/quote]
Its from a previous discussion that I should have probably let lie.
In my opinion the referee would look back at that and say a yellow card was probably all that was needed as it could be deemed a bit wreckless in todays soft arse game.
I honestly think he didn’t know how much of the ball Mcmanman took and was boyd by the ridiculous over reaction by their players.
But that decision will always be a matter of opinion which is why there is no real recourse to appeal it.
Not as black and white as Barnsley believes it to be.
And that is the last I will say on the subject now as it has the potential to become as tiring as the tedious Rugby and Martinez posts.[/quote]
What has Kris Boyd got to do with it ? If you did in fact intend to write ‘Buoyed’ then I am afraid to inform you that your use of that word would have been used out of context and made no sense ! Are you saying that he was kept afloat by their players or that they raised his spirits and inspired him ? Just saying ! ;)
PS Overreaction is one word ! Just saying ! ;)[/quote]I have never claimed to be a master of the English language.
You could say its lazy as I usually try to take the time to check things over but in between posting on here I do have to look like I am getting at least some work done.
Thank you for your input and I am looking forward to scrutinising your posts in the future.[/quote]
Touchy touchy ! ha ha ha ;)
The usual scapegoat is the referee. Coyle has already wrongly criticised the referee who dismissed McManaman, promising to appeal against the decision. Fortunately, wiser counsel prevailed.
Who made you judge, jury and executioner of refereeing decisions?
He was sent off on a point of opinion i.e that he had used excessive force in his tackle.
Anyone with half a brain can see he used the necessary force to make the tackle causing no danger to the other player and if you think its excessive or dangerous I would make the argument you are a bit soft.
The reason Coyle didn’t appeal is because red cards are only rescinded if there is a glaring error made in the decision.
So while the FA and the referee may have turned around and said after seeing the reply that it was a good tackle and didn’t deserve a red card but probably a yellow card at most as it could be judged as being a bit wreckless there is nothing they can do to overturn it.
But obviously you know best having googled the subject once and are now the cockney latic authority on all FA related matters.[/quote]
youll feel a right prat when you read all that back and try to put into the context of what WGTB actually said.
you must have googled the word prat and are now the cockneylatic authority on all things prattish.[/quote]
Its from a previous discussion that I should have probably let lie.
In my opinion the referee would look back at that and say a yellow card was probably all that was needed as it could be deemed a bit wreckless in todays soft arse game.
I honestly think he didn’t know how much of the ball Mcmanman took and was boyd by the ridiculous over reaction by their players.
But that decision will always be a matter of opinion which is why there is no real recourse to appeal it.
Not as black and white as Barnsley believes it to be.
And that is the last I will say on the subject now as it has the potential to become as tiring as the tedious Rugby and Martinez posts.[/quote]
What has Kris Boyd got to do with it ? If you did in fact intend to write ‘Buoyed’ then I am afraid to inform you that your use of that word would have been used out of context and made no sense ! Are you saying that he was kept afloat by their players or that they raised his spirits and inspired him ? Just saying ! ;)
PS Overreaction is one word ! Just saying ! ;)A question and I really don’t know the answer to this…Have WAFC players paraded the FA Cup around the pitch at a Warriors home game ? Genuine question ! If the answer is yes then how well were they received and if not, why not ?
The answer is no. The first Warriors home game after the FA Cup Final was 28 Jun, by which time the manager and 7 of your cup final squad had left the club. I guess the remaining players were on their summer holidays by then.
To have the likes of Owen Coil, James Peach and Grant Halt parading the FA Cup round the DW now would look a little silly, seeing as they had no involvement.
However, I think it would be great if both trophies were on display as the teams came out on Friday – if nothing else, it would give the city of Hull something to aspire to![/quote]
So 7 have now departed leaving 11 ( A football team ! ) to parade the cup to the RL fans ! :) Maybe they have been asked already if they want to do it and have politely declined the offer, who knows ? ;)
I think you’re saying that Moyes could get more out of the players he bought than Martinez will be able to do.That wouldn’t be particularly damning. Do you think Moyes will be able to get more out the players Ferguson bought than Ferguson did?
The question that worries me is; will Coyle be able to create a successful team using the nine players that he has bought, plus the Premier League midfield he inherited?
In a way I am saying that RM is not the next big thing in the World of football management and that I fear he may be a little out of his depth at Everton with the expectation of their fans !
I think that you and your mate Muttywhitedog should get a room and bum each other senseless and maybe that will have some sort of cathartic effect and eventually put an end to this banal topic !
