Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Why do you keep biting mutty? Behind your small mindedness and obsessive nature there does seem to be some intelligence. Why let it get to you?
Because he gets some kind of enjoyment out of antagonising people on here and is allowed to do so.
If he was a self-declared Latics fan and supporter of another RL team trying to post the same kind of stuff on a Warriors forum he wouldn’t last two minutes.
http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/sport/wanderers/14288422.Wanderers_sell_Euxton_training_ground_to_Wigan_Athletic/Not doing too bad for a little club are we?
Huron Properties?
Not purchased by Wigan Athletic then?
Disgusting? What a stupid word to use. We had 4 home games on the bounce where we scored 3. Today was an off day. Disappointing yes. Below par yes. But disgusting? What a pathetic over reaction.Perhaps one of those who thought it necessary to boo at the final whistle.
Does anybody know how the pitch is looking for tomorrow?
Sorry to get back on subject!!Green?
Here you go……!
The Sale of Central Park
The introduction and move to summer rugby in 1996 saw Wigan become emerged in financial difficulty. They had built up debts of £3 million and the club’s board members decided the answer to the financial problems was to sell Central Park.
Local Businessman Dave Whelan, owner of Wigan Athletic Football Club, wanted to buy Central Park and have Latics share the ground with the Warriors. He offered £4.5m for the ground and pledged to spend a further £12.5m to turn it into a 20,000 all seater stadium for both clubs. Shareholders had voted for the idea but the Wigan board had another offer to consider from the Tesco Supermarket chain, which was rumoured to be closer to £10 million. If the Tesco offer was accepted, Wigan would be homeless. The idea was that Wigan would share with Bolton Wanderers new Reebok Stadium, which at the time was being built.
Central Park was the historic home of Wigan Rugby League and the fans were outraged at the suggestion of Wigan moving four miles out of town to Bolton’s Reebok Stadium.
In late February 1997 news emerged that Wigan were holding talks with Bolton about a ground share. Dave Whelan responded to the news by offering to virtually wipe out the club’s debts within 48 hours. In early March Tesco increased their offer to buy Central Park to £12.5 million and news broke that the ground sale was to “go-ahead”. Fans held a protest outside Central Park ahead of a pre season friendly against Castleford whilst other fans chose to boycott the game. Some fans even travelled down to Tesco Headquarters and protested there! The Wigan fans simply did not want the club to move to Bolton, even if it was for a temporary period. They could not believe the board could sell the ground without a permanent new home being in place.
The Wigan board was made up of four people, Jack Robinson, Arthur Thomas, Tom Rathbone and John Martin. They had a vote over Whelan’s offer and Martin, who ran the Riverside Club at Central Park, was the only member of the board who voted for it. The other three voted against as they were holding out for an increased offer from Tesco and thus seeing us move out of the town to Bolton. Following the vote Martin resigned has he had become frustrated by the board’s apparent lack of urgency to agree the Whelan plan despite shareholders voting in favour of the move.
As the month wore on over 200 disgruntled shareholders met to discuss the controversial decision to sell Central Park to Tesco. They also backed a petition calling for the removal of chairman Jack Robinson and Mick Rathbone from the board immediately.
Into May 1997 and shareholders had decided they wanted to oust Jack Robinson as chairman. A shareholders action group claimed the board sold Central Park to Tesco without consultation after previously agreeing to accept a rescue package from millionaire Dave Whelan. Former player Phil Clarke was offered to the shareholders as the man to lead the ousting bid. The group’s next move will be a circular to the club’s 1500 shareholders seeking support for their attempt to remove Mr Robinson and his vice-chairman Tom Rathbone at an Emergency General Meeting on May 20.A week before the shareholders EGM, Wigan unveil details of a proposed new super stadium. But critics of the board fear that if the team moves out of town to Bolton Wanderers’ new stadium at Horwich they will never return to Wigan. Robinson had met the shareholders’ action group that week but their spokesman Ernie Benbow said at the time that “he was unable to give any categorical assurances about a site in Wigan.”
At the same time Dave Whelan unveiled plans to build a new 25,000 seater stadium for Wigan Athletic at Robin Park but he refused to open ground share negotiations with the Wigan board after the collapse of his Central Park rescue package earlier this year.
On 20th May Wigan shareholders held the EGM and Jack Robinson survived, for now. Robinson won a vote of confidence 484 to 400 while fellow board member, Rathbone held on by 489 to 407. So Robinson was still chairman but Wigan was still homeless. The wrangling was far from over.
June 1997 saw the Wigan team embark on month long trip down under for the World Club Challenge. The trip had quietened the ground move saga but as they returned Jack Robinson faced a new vote of confidence from the shareholders. A newspaper reported that an associate gathered proxy votes for the original EGM in May by fraudulent methods. The paper claimed someone was instructed to fill in forms for shareholders who were believed to have died so they could be used as votes in favour of the two Wigan directors. Robinson reacted by saying “(The claims) are totally untruthful. This is just part of a smear campaign which has been going on by a certain group of people who want me out of the club.”
On August 19th 1997 Jack Robinson and Tom Rathbone resigned from the Wigan board. Then Wigan Coach Eric Hughes revealed that the pair had their homes damaged and their lives threatened. Following the resignations the Rugby Football League’s financial department were called in by the club to investigate its cash flow position. Arthur Thomas was the only remaining board member left so it was he who became temporary chairman. With Robinson gone John Martin, who earlier had resigned from the board, offered to ease the club’s financial problems with a 750,000 interest free loan. But the offer was conditional on the Warriors staying in Wigan and rejecting a temporary move to Bolton. He made the offer to bide the club time to negotiate a deal to move to proposed Robin Park stadium with Wigan Athletic on a permanent basis.
It was finally announced on October 29th 1997 that Wigan would not be moving to the Reebok Stadium. Mike Nolan, who owned finance and car leasing businesses in Wigan, took over as chairman of the club from Arthur Thomas. He was joined on the board by John Martin who returned after his row with the old regime. Tesco agreed to let the Warriors stay on at Central Park until the end of 1999, when they would then join up with Wigan Athletic at their new stadium which was about to be built at Robin Park.
This article was posted on the “Cherry and White Independent Wigan RLFC Website” as part of an article documenting the life and times of Wigan RLFC at Central Park.
I would imagine that considering both clubs pay rentDo we actually know this to be true?
I say keep them in.
If they moved out who would everyone blame next time the pitch turned into a swamp?
Probably still the rugby TBF[/quote]
I don’t think there can be any doubt that in this instance the rugby game played last Friday did turn the pitch into a swamp. Had it not gone ahead we wouldn’t be having this debate and the pitch could well have lasted until the scheduled refurbishment this summer.
You don’t do irony do you mutty?
Interesting point that JJ is acting as spokesman about relaying the pitch.
Shared? No – it’s Latics who are putting up the money.
Do you have an official link to that fact, or are you assuming because JJ was interviewed, then Latics have put up the money?
Does the cost of pitch relaying or ground maintenance feature in the Latics Annual Accounts?
I agree that the pitch is a mess, but as Egg has said, its the location – Huddersfield & Hull play as many league games on their pitch without it turning into a mud bath every February. In fact, when you were premier league, there would have been 7-8 less games played on it at this time of year and it still always looked shite.
I read somewhere that there is a giant septic tank under the pitch that would have been costly to remove at the time of construction, so DW went for the cheaper option and left it in situ to send its poisonous gases up through the land, which prevents the grass from growing during the cold months.[/quote]
Maybe the owner of Wigan Athletic Football Club pleaded with the owner of the DW Stadium to re-lay the pitch for this coming Saturday?
The game would most likely have gone ahead regardless of Sky involvement and there lies the problem when sharing a pitch with a rugby club.
“The pitch has deteriorated significantly since November but we were anticipating that it would be robust enough to last until the end of the season”, says Jonathan Jackson. That anticipation was obviously based on the belief that a rugby game wouldn’t have taken place on a pitch that clearly wasn’t fit for a football match.
Fatties on it for the first time in a few months and what a mess already !
Questionable whether the match should have gone aheadThat’s the downside of sharing a pitch with a rugby club. Had it been football the game would have not have taken place. Same pitch but different rules.
I’m surprised we didn’t sign a centre-back.
I used my B&Q pensioners card.But I only got 10% off.
It would only work on a Wednesday though….!
Sky Sports Football those stats.82.37% of all stats are made up.
All their goals came down our right side.
For the first we had Wildschut on the right wing who doesn’t track back plus Daniels who had a mare and Barnett as the right-sided CB.
For the second Jacobs, equally inept at tracking back, had swapped with Wildschut so the problem hadn’t been addressed.
James comes on for Barnett so they shift the back four across to accommodate him because we don’t have a CB on the bench and the third goes in.Also, at 3-1 Widschutt, then on the left, sets up Grigg who for the third time squanders a clear-cut chance to put the game out of reach.
I still have to be convinced about Grigg. He needs too many chances to score, lacks close control and is too lightweight to play the lone striker role.
The deficiencies are there to see. I expect them to be sort out this month.
Please tell me that’s a tongue in cheek remark FFS! :ohmy:[/quote]
Better than Grant Holt.
-
AuthorPosts


