Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 2,587 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ashton Town #175399
    Is that true? I did hear he slagged us off in his book

    Yep. By his own admission he was out of order in the way he behaved to try and engineer a move mid-season
    He said it when the window shut and I’ve read a part of his book where he says it.
    I haven’t read the whole book to be able to say whether he slags the club off or not

    in reply to: Ashton Town #175395
    McCulloch wanted a move but at least he stayed and saw the season out.

    He saw the season out for one reason & one reason only – because Latics refused to sell him for the ridiculously low price that McCulloch in particular was trying to force them to sell him for. Right in the middle of a relegation battle

    It had nowt whatsoever to do with any loyalty towards Latics

    in reply to: Ashton Town #175389
    All three contributed such a lot as players.

    Can’t disagree with that

    in reply to: Ashton Town #175385

    I know I’m in the minority here but I never really had much of an issue with what Chimbonda did – his timing was undoutedly poor & it isn’t the done thing but if he wanted to go (which was what I was disappointed with after we’d given him a break over here after his turbulent later time in the French league) then to me it doesn’t make a whole host of difference whether he’d said it after the Arsenal game or waited until the week after

    The conduct of Bullard a few weeks earlier & even more so that of McCulloch the season after was far worse & much more disrespectful to the club in my opinion – yet these 2 are hero worshipped :blink: :blink: :blink:

    never understood that

    in reply to: Ashton Town #175384
    Do do do Chimbonda is a winker!
    Disrespectful to the club, his team mates the fans and his manager.
    Bullard was talking about it on soccer am Saturday, what he did was unacceptable.

    The same Jimmy Bullard who (allegedly) asked/demanded a pay rise less than 12 months after his last one & when he was told no, instructed/allowed his agent to hawk him round every top flight club whilst telling them what the buy out clause in his contract was. Bearing in mind that the signing was announced 4 days after we’d played Fulham in a league game it suggests contact was possibly made prior to things becoming official

    Absolute load of guff that he went to be nearer his family & I know that the club (i.e. Whelan & Jewell) was less than happy about it because he was dropped completely from the match day squad for the remaining 2 games of the season & Jewell was open that he wasn’t happy about it

    Pot, kettle & black Mr Bullard!!

    in reply to: Leeds #175254

    I’d agree if the guy had just been peeping through the fence or using some ladders but from what I heard Frank Lampard say today they caught him on his hands and knees with a pair of pliers trying to break in through the fence

    in reply to: Will Grigg Rumour #175067
    Come on Sunderland you’ve got to be having some kind of a News Years hangover, 200k ?. You wouldn’t get an Academy player from Peterborough for that

    If that player Bournemouth signed last week from Liverpool who has made 5 senior starts for them & scored 1 goal is worth £19mill, Sunderland really are taking the pish with that offer & I hope Latics treated it with the derision it deserved

    in reply to: Will Grigg Rumour #175023
    How the hell came anyone put Garner/Windass/Vaughan ahead of him is staggering

    I’d agree with that – Grigg has his faults (which tend to be more exposed at a higher level – over a prolonged period & not a one off game like City) but my God, he’s got far more about him than those 3 combined

    All Garner seems to want to do is kick off
    Aside from the odd decent game, Windass is painfully slow & limited skill wise
    Vaughan might be alright as an impact sub in the last 10 minutes when you’re bombarding the opponents box, but put him in from the start & he’s woeful

    in reply to: Use of Advantage rule query #175000
    I know Barlow got three, but what a geat header that was from Simon Hawarth.(sp)

    That’s what Haworth had in his locker – his natural ability was up there with the best I’ve seen at Latics. Unfortunately at times, his application was down there with the worst

    in reply to: Use of Advantage rule query #174961
    Was 1-0 actually at the time to PNE.

    We equalised from the spot and went on to score 3 in the 2nd half as their sub keeper had a nightmare.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVoJNQtUjBA

    Having watched that, the referee could legitimately argue that he played advantage after the foul but that the advantage never occurred because Barlow was being challenged by the time he got the ball & that challenge meant he couldn’t get a clean shot away – and not that he only pulled it back when he missed

    in reply to: Use of Advantage rule query #174958

    By the letter of the law, the referee cannot call the play back to give the foul if they have played advantage to allow a shot on goal.

    VAT is right in that it did happen for Latics against Preston & that’s why their manager went nuts (if i remember rightly, at the time the game was 1-1 & a tight affair)

    However, a lot of referees will call play back & use the excuse that there wasn’t enough time between the foul & the effort on target for them to either blow for the foul or to play/signal/shout an advantage – that’s why most ref’s will delay an advantage call several seconds.

    It happened to the team I’m involved with now in the Vase last season – leading 1-0 in the lead up to half time they play the ball over the top & their striker gets free only to be pulled back & down by our centre half just inside the penalty area. He still shoots however which beats the keeper only to land on top of the goal and at that point (several seconds after the foul) the ref awards a penalty which they score to make it 1-1.
    As secretary I’m allowed to go & speak with the ref after the game & I asked him to explain that decision as I felt it had cost us the game (we lost 3-2 to a goal in injury time in the 2nd half!!) & the ref’s excuse was (as above) that he didn’t play an advantage but that the foul, shot & miss were so close together that he gave the penalty at the earliest point he could.
    I told him that he was talking rubbish & that he knew what he’d done because he didn’t caution or send off our player despite him denying a goal scoring opportunity so even if he hadn’t played the advantage he wasn’t applying the laws of the game as we should have been down to 10 men – he didn’t get a very good mark from me!!

    When I was a referee I once got pulled up for playing an advantage just outside the box & then awarding a free kick after the shot had been put over. I was also told by assessors & coaches not to play advantage in the penalty area

    So in your case Travis, the ref was right

    in reply to: Marc Antoine …….. #174912

    I think we will be very disappointed with the transfer window. What happened to our scouting policy, we unearthed some real gems in 05 from Honduras,Ecuador etc. Players who did a good job for us then made us huge profits when sold on.Now we seem to bring in some terrible players nowhere near good enough. I’ve had a bad feeling about this ever since that article Royle did in the Mail.

    Which article was this nuneaton? I’m afraid i dont read the mail.[/quote]

    He wants back in Runc now that doesn’t take much to work out does it. I’m convinced if Cookie goes we will be lumbered with Royle. He,s been out of the game a long time and this season we can’t afford time for him to find his feet again. We are in a serious position and need a boost not a project.[/quote]

    If it’s the same one I’ve read then you’ve misread it Nuneaton.
    The article is all about him getting back into the game in his new role at Latics after he’d left Everton.
    It wasn’t about, nor does it mention, wanting to get back into the managerial game

    in reply to: Top Goalscorer #174596

    Let’s be realistic here though. He’s scored 6 goals playing in a League 2 side
    He’s done well there but we’ve all seen over the last few seasons the massive gap between Lge 1 & the Championship. Well double it for the level he’s been playing at
    If he stays I’d say sub appearances are what he should be given just to test him out in small bursts. For me his time at Oldham over the last few months doesn’t put him in front of Grigg (20+ goals a season player in lge 1) or Garner (proven Championship striker over several seasons) or Vaughan
    That’s not to say those 3 aren’t without their faults but it’ll take more than 6 goals on lge2 to convince me Lang should be chucked into Latics’ starting lineup

    I agree but, how does a player improve and play at a higher level unless he’s given a chance ?.
    It’s pointless keeping him, infact, it’s pointless having an Academy because thier written off before their ever given a chance. Were better off getting loans in from the the Prem so we can improve their young lads so they can sell on for a tidy profit.
    Over the years we’ve had alot of so called hot properties down here on loan who have turned out to be no better than our own.
    Wouldn’t it be nice to have a young left back coming through the ranks and given the same chance as Robinson has had[/quote]

    I see what you’re saying but there has to be some trust in the management teams who see them in training every day.
    If they think they’re good enough (a la Jewell with Baines) then they’ll play. If they don’t think they’re good enough (yet at least) they’ll send me out on loan.
    Truth be told none of us know how good Lang is so I think to call for him to be put in the first team on the back of 6 lge2 goals in 4 & a bit months is clutching at straws coz we’re so bad at the moment.
    Look at it this way if Latics were to sign someone tomorrow who had that record, we’d all be completely underwhelmed.

    in reply to: Top Goalscorer #174572

    Let’s be realistic here though. He’s scored 6 goals playing in a League 2 side
    He’s done well there but we’ve all seen over the last few seasons the massive gap between Lge 1 & the Championship. Well double it for the level he’s been playing at
    If he stays I’d say sub appearances are what he should be given just to test him out in small bursts. For me his time at Oldham over the last few months doesn’t put him in front of Grigg (20+ goals a season player in lge 1) or Garner (proven Championship striker over several seasons) or Vaughan
    That’s not to say those 3 aren’t without their faults but it’ll take more than 6 goals on lge2 to convince me Lang should be chucked into Latics’ starting lineup

    in reply to: Safe standing #174172
    Not a snowball in hells chance of it returning after the events of the last few weeks. Bottle thrown last night the banana skin the other week and Chelsea fans being arseoles will surely be a massive setback to the reintroduction of standing areas at stadia.

    What possible logical explanation is there that the modern standing areas shouldn’t be introduced because 1 Arsenal fan threw a bottle (whilst using seats), some Chelsea fans were shouting racist remarks (whilst using seats) & a Spurs fan threw a banana skin (whilst using seats)?

    I take on board Otter’s comments that football’s critics will use any excuse to beat the football fan with but these 3 incidents are of on relevance whatsoever to the reintroduction of some form of terracing

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 2,587 total)