TyldesleyLatic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,326 through 2,340 (of 2,587 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: all out attack #28903

    As someone who has not seen any of the Fulham game from Sunday, can I ask what formation Bobby played in this

    I saw the line up when I checked my phone & saw that it had Moreno, Scotland, Rodallega & N’Zogbia & assumed that he’d gone 4-4-2 but having read this thread I’m guessing not & am now puzzled as to how he tried to make that work as a 4-5-1

    in reply to: Picture proof to the F.A. and Mr Atwell #28225

    Tevez’s challenge was as bad, if not worse, but Caldwell would have staill brought his trailing leg round & caught him whether he was stood on one or both legs

    in reply to: Picture proof to the F.A. and Mr Atwell #28222

    The fact that he got the ball is irrelevant

    in reply to: Roberto Martinez or Jack Sparrow? #28202

    fair enough standish – seems we’re singing from the same hymn sheet. Hopefully VAT gets where I’m coming from too (even if he doesn’t agree)

    Anyway, like you I’m hoping that experienced heads are brough in in the summer coz if you add another load of players (who need time to adapt) to replace the ones we can all foresee leaving then if we do stay up this season (& I think we will – just) next season will be even more of a struggle

    in reply to: Roberto Martinez or Jack Sparrow? #28201

    “To me, playing Thomas, Diame and Scharner in the middle is overkill, especially for someone who claims to play the passing game. If he really wants to play everything through the middle, as he seems to want to do by playing the wingers on the wrong wings, he needs better passers in there.”

    I think its obvious to everybody that its overkill. he did it against Burnly & the game sparked into life after Thomas went off
    I can understand him doing it against City to be honest & to be fair it was working coz it completely stifled em but as you say its overkill against most sides.
    I’m hoping that on Sunday he’ll go with Diame & McCarthy with Moses “in the hole” with N’Zogbia & Rodallega on the wings coz the problem IMO (and Chris Waddle – managerial genius that he is!!) pointed out that we struggle to get me into the box quickly enough when the front man has held up play coz (with the exception of the wingers) the midfielders are all too defensive in nature

    in reply to: April Fools … #28200

    heard some scouser on the radio this morning phoning in to say that he was going to chain himself to the Liver Building in protest at the news announcement that they were going to change the clocks on there to digital & that he’d “bet thousands of others will too”!!!! :oops: :oops: :oops:

    in reply to: Nzogbia’s off #28189

    I think he’ll go too but where does your claim come from

    I’ve seen an article today in which Bobby talks about him leaving but only if a club regularly in Europe, and if our asking price is met & if Whelan says the money can be re-invested in the team.
    He specifically mentions a move to Brum wouldn’t happen

    in reply to: Picture proof to the F.A. and Mr Atwell #28185

    “What do you know ? You hung yourself years ago so get back over to your own dimension !!”

    Not only that but it appears that all his years as a ghoul have addled his brain.
    If you’re sliding along the floor you can use your arms, hands, leg & feet to adjust & slow down your tackle however slim that might be.
    If every part of you is off the ground you have no chance whatsoever of pulling out of that challenge, stopping or slowing yourself down. When judging whether a foul is worthy of just a ticking off, a yellow or a red that is exactly the sort of thing that the FA tell referess to consider – bearing that in mind I can understand why he was sent off. Another ref might have viewed it differently & might have sent Tevez off too but if they appealed the panel would slow the challenge down see he left the ground, his studs were up & then his trailing leg followed through & wrapped round Tevez, say it was a foul, it was a red card, it was a frivilous appeal & he’d have his ban increased

    in reply to: Rumour Mill – Callejon #28184

    From a report i read a few weeks ago about this fella Martinez sees him as the creative spark playing “in the hole” role that Gomez has flopped in

    in reply to: Roberto Martinez or Jack Sparrow? #28183

    “You have basically admitted we have to take a chance on unknown quantity signings.”

    Of course we do but I think that you & standish are missing the point that I’m trying to make. Nor have I said that the managers knew all the players I mentioned would definitely do a good job for us – no manager can say that. Even the likes of Ferguson when he spends £30mill on Rooney, Ferdinand, Berbatov etc..
    Latics, more often than not, always have to take a big chance on signings BUT even bearing that in mind our managers need to be confident that they are signing players that they fell can step straight in to the starting line up. The players we’ve all mentioned are ones who, including Heskey & Kirkland for different reasons, our managers at the time were taking a chance on BUT they also felt confident enough to throw them into first team action straight away – You didn’t hear Jewell or Bruce say on signing Chimbonda, Heskey, Palacios, Scharner, Valencia etc.. “I want to ease them into things” or “I won’t be rushed into starting them” or “He’s not yet ready to start”. They were signed & they started coz, gamble or not, the managers felt they were ready &/or better than what we had.

    By Martinez’s own admission (if you believe his about turn on a couple of them) he has signed Gomez, Scotland, Amaya, McCarthy, Moreno, Gohouri & Moses knowing full well that they weren’t ready for premier league action (on signing) & would/will have to be eased in over varying lengths of time.
    That’s 7 of his 10 signings & IMO is far too many. You might be able to carry 1 or 2 but 7?? Its his strategy & its a departure from our previous 3 managers philosophy & he’ll have to live or die by it. Personally I don’t think it’ll work – in the situation we were in with our chairman having instigated the dismantling of the previous side Bobby was in an admittedly tough position & I think he took the gamble that the players we had on his appointment would be good enough to carry us whilst these players settled in when in reality (apart from the back 4) they were either our previous managers flops (and he only needed to look at their appearance records to realise that) or players still settling in themselves (Rodallega & N’Zogbia). If that’s the case (and its the only thign I can think to justify his signings) & the likes of Figueroa, Scharner, N’Zogbia & Rodallega go in the summer I hope he changes this approach

    I hope that’s clarified the point I’ve been trying to make coz like Standish I feel like I’m going round in circles!!

    in reply to: Roberto Martinez or Jack Sparrow? #28139

    “Amaya … ok, he has played twice and looked dodgy. But perhaps he will come good”

    That just reinforces my point though. At this moment in time he isn’t good enough so we’re wasting a invaluable transfer fee & salary funds when they could have gone on someone who is up to the job now & not in 2 seasons time. Its not an impossible task coz previous managers have managed to find the likes of Bramble, De Zeeuw, Scharner, Boyce who didn’t need a season/seasons to “settle in”. If our managers sign someone from a spanish second division side they need to be confident that they are good enough to start now whilst accepting that there is still some development for them to make & hence future profit on transfer fees

    “Judging him on two cup games is hardly fair” – fair point but he now seems to be 6th in the pecking order for a centre half’s spot so its fair to say our manager doesn’t think he’s up to the job at present either

    The others you mention are down to personal opinion & whilst I know what you mean about not being a Wigan player – the majority of the crowd will always prefer a limited grafter liek Neil Roberts as opposed to someone with bags of skill but less commitment like Simon Haworth. But personally I don’t think Gomez is up to the job & its nowt to do with him being a fancy dan – he’s just not good enough. Espanyol didn’t want him & bearing in mind their usual league position they are a Spanish equivalent of Latics & it was always going to be debatable as to whether a reserve player from a similar top flight club was going to be good enough for our first team.

    You reinforce your point about “Wigan type players” with what you say about Scotland coz he is a grafter but he isn’t a premier league standard player in a million years no matter how hard he tries. While he gives 100% he shouldn’t get slaughtered from the terraces but it doesn’t alter the fact that he isn’t good enough

    Just to back up my point Bobby is now saying that he wanted to ease both the above players into top flight life (contrary to what he said when they were signed) so he himself is admitting to signing players who “aren’t ready”
    A club like Wigan Athletic IMO can’t afford to sign players who need easing in. We operate with too small a squad, with too small a budget & in too cut throat a division to allow that to work. We need players good enough to start now not those “we hope will come good” – that doesn’t mean expecting us to sign “top” players but as I said elsewhere to chuck all your eggs in the “players with potential” basket is a dangerous tactic if you want to stay in this division

    Oh & as long as I’ve been watching Latics there have always been people (me included at times) who will moan about players & managers whether we’re doing well or not & I’m sure the same goes for every club. Latics getting relegated won’t stop that!!

    in reply to: Roberto Martinez or Jack Sparrow? #28137

    “The problem is having to be addressed by Roberto, yet none of it was his doing.”

    I’d disagree with that statement & add that far from completely addressing the problem, he is adding to it
    As well as Scotland, Gomez, Amaya, Sinclair & Stojkovic who aren’t good enough & never will be he’s brought in McCarthy (who took 5 months to be ready to start according to Bobby), Gohouri (not match fit), Moses (not considered ready for a start by Bobby) & Moreno (took him until the last couple of weeks to be “ready” to start regularly)

    Probably only Diame & Thomas were up to hitting the ground running & one whilst a good battler is very limited (Thomas) & the other has been inconsistant

    Yes he had a squad with kapo, De Ridder, King, Cho & Koumas who fall into your category that Bobby inherited but he’s more than added his own IMO

    in reply to: Unbelievable! #28136

    I think there’s a certain sense of looking at Caldwell’s challenge through Latics tinted specs.

    if I’m honest I winced when he put the challenge in & half expected the red to come out but regardless of that no media pundit I’ve heard since the challenge was made has said that he shouldn’t have been sent off – and that can’t all be anti-Latics bias

    in reply to: Unbelievable! #28121

    “If the report says “scissor tackle” which is deemed as dangerous, then we’ve every right to appeal. Whatever you make of it, it wasn’t a scissor tackle.”

    Yes it was. If it wasn’t then how did his trailing leg end up wrapped round Tevez’s leg before tevez leapt out of the way as if shot, rolled around then leapt back up when the red card was shown?

    The one thing that would stink if the rumour that it was for a scissor tackle is true is that Attwell would appear to have looked at the footage again & changed his mind as to why he sent him off in order to make it stick in the event of an appeal

    in reply to: Chubbies to Leigh RMI #28120

    That’s an absolute disgrace if its true

    When you bear in mind that Horwich/Leigh RMI’s/Genesis’s owners basically saved Leigh RL from going under by buying their ground from them & letting them continue to play there, the way that the football club looks like its now been shafted stinks.
    I might be wrong but I also though that the sale of Hilton Park was used in part to fund the new stadium – same with land at Leigh college & one of the local amateur rugby league sides
    Personally I think the club will now go under – so well done Wigan Council

    The story reminds me of how St Helens Town FC have allegedly been treated after allowing themselves to be bought out for nowt by the RL side & for them to sell their ground for housing to pay off debts. Only for them to turn round several years down the line, start demanding back payment on rents, leccy etc.. & now I don’t think they’re gonna be allowed to play at the RL’s new ground

Viewing 15 posts - 2,326 through 2,340 (of 2,587 total)