Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I’ve met some real salt of the earth Rangers & celtic fans over the years who as soon as you’ve started talking about football have turned into the biggest idiots on the planet
On top of that because their football is inextricably linked to their religion, religious bigotry can be thrown into the mix as wellNeil Lennon has been a target for those on one side of the divide in Scotland & Northern Ireland ever since on the eve he was due to captain Northern Ireland for the first time he is alleged to have said that he would prefer to be playing for a united Ireland side. He didn’t deserve what followed by any stretch of the imagination but anyone with half a brain cell would have known what would follow a comment like that in countries like N Ireland & Scotland (I believe there is some doubt as to whether he actually said it)
So he was already a target before he became Celtic boss. He is now the figurehead for the sporting club which many see as the banner for one side of the divide.
So have other managers but they haven’t got the flack he has got & whilst nothing excuses what has happened with the parcel bombs, bullets in the post, assaults in the ground, Neil Lennon himself needs to realise that, being in the position he is, he needs to reign in his conduct. Acting like he did with Ally McCoist was inexcusable no matter what McCoist said, in the replay he antagonised rangers fans with his gestures, he’s constantly moaning that there’s a conspiracy against Celtic in the SFA & SPL, accusing teams of trying harder against Celtic than they do against Rangers just days before his team play that side etc..
As I say none of it excuses what has happened & in an ideal world he could say & do those things & people would just shrug their shoulders & say its only a game but in N Ireland, parts of Scotland & the Old Firm unfortunately it isn’t just a gameGoing back to my first paragraph in his dealings with the media & from what I’ve seen of Celtic games, unfortunately Neil Lennon presents an image that he is like of of those celtic/rangers fans I was on about. No other Celtic or rangers manager that i can remember has done & on top of what happened with the N Ireland captaincy that’s why he has become such a target for the morons from the opposite “side” to him
Myself & 2 fellow darksiders will be making rare appearances on Sunday too
Mind you we’re only going to whinge & moan – Bloody rubbish latics. Get gone Bobby lad & so on!! ;)In the words of George Clinton “Let’s tear the roof off the sucker!!”
With regards to the stick Al Habsi got from Hansen & Lawrenson
I’d agree that they were a bit wide of the mark saying he’s a bit of a hit & miss keeper (he makes no more high profile clangers than anyone else) but he was at fault for Young’s goal on Saturday
Its basic goalkeeping that if you get a wall to cover one side of the goal, you stand & cover the other side. If a player gets it up & over the wall & into the net there’s nowt you can do about it. What you don’t do is cover one side of the goal with the wall & then jump behind that wall as the kick’s taken & leave the other side of the goal exposed.
That was bad keeping but he is without doubt our player of the season & his good keeping far outweighs his badI had no doubt he could score. I have actually seen him score live! (There’s a quiz question – when could I possibly have done that – it was in England but NOT for Latics?)I just think the set-up wasn’t to his style – like Scotland et al.
Jason Scotland had played in Bobby’s “set-up” for 2 seasons prior to him following his boss to Latics & during that time had scored the best part of 40 goals in the lower leagues, so i don’t think his failure at Latics was due to the set up not being his style
It was more a case of him not being good enough for the top flight & he wouldn’t have been no matter what team or what set up he was playing inBoselli I haven’t seen enough of to comment but being top scorer in South America & on the fringes of the Argentina World Cup squad would indicate that he is good enough at the highest level but it was blatantly obvious that he can’t play up front on his own – something that as someone else has said was pointed out to him by our former director of football prior to Whelan authorising a bid for him. It was also somet the BBC south american football correspondent pointed out on his blog before the season started
Just give Bobby time & he might start to realise these things too!!! ;)
Well said Swindon
It also echoes the comments of Mick McCarthy prior to Wolves game yesterday when he asked why everybody suddenly thinks that all he teams in & around the bottom are going to win all their games. Teams like Latics, West Ham, Wolves, Blackpool, Blackburn & Brum are all down at the bottom coz they don’t win many games
I think in terms of who will go down that alot of people are seeing United with the title sewn up just lying down & taking it easy. Can’t see it myself. Those who play against Blackburn will a) wanna confirm the title & b) be busting a gut to show they deserve to start. Against Blackpool it is likely to be a changed side & many of those chosen will probably know that they aren’t starters for the final but they will be desparate to show ferguson they deserve a place on the bench & to be called on if he needs changes
I also don’t think United’s record after having won the title is particularly bad. I know they lost at home to west ham but as someone has pointed out on another thread they could & should have won that game & perhaps more importantly Blackpool don’t have Carlos Tevez playing for them. I can recall United playing blackburn at home the first season they won the premier league after being confirmed as champions without even playing – they went on to wallop Blackburn 3-1I did the BBC predictor this morning & reckon that if Latics get 4 points it should be enough. I had blackburn down to lose both games, Blackpool to draw with Bolton & get beat by United, Wolves to lose at Sunderland & beat Blackburn, West Ham to lose against Latics & win against whoever it is they play on the last day. Latics I had beating West Ham & getting a draw against a Stoke side whose season will be over after the cup final & who will have played a midweek game too
Not saying I’m confident on either latics prediction but if the team play as well as they are capable of then it is more then possibleDuke – You use players like Bramble (not signed by Bruce), Watson, Mido (who incidentally was not here when Martinez arrived) & someone else as the type of donkey players that Martinez inherited from Bruce
Those players might not be everyone’s cup of tea but under Bruce Bramble looked a superb defender & was part of a back 4 that had one of the best records in the division. Within months Bobby had turned him into a rabbit trapped in the headlights. IMO Bramble was also a better defender than any of the centre halves that Bobby has brought in
With regards to Watson – would this be the same Ben Watson that Bruce barely played after signing but who Bobby now picks every week (over players that he himself has brought in) & who to be fair to both Watson & Bobby is now playing pretty well more often than not?
With regards to Mido a) Bobby didn’t inherit him & b) he was no worse than 3 strikers that Bobby has paid a combined total of around £12mill for
And on Brown – did a great job for Latics & certainly a better one than anyone who has occupied that position since (IMO)
I do get your general point that guardiola has better players at his disposal & so that is why he’s had more success in trying to play the same style of football but to simply give their names as players who Bobby inherited who aren’t good enough doesn’t tell the whole pictureAnd linked to that, earlier in the article you mention that Guardiola has Messi to fire in the goals yet Bobby has had to work with Gomez, Scotland & Di Santo
Yep that is undoutedly true & would be a handicap on anyone but who was it who signed Gomez saying that “he will be the creative hub of the team, I have no doubts that he is good enough for the premier league”? Who was it who signed Jason Scotland & in response to questions as to whether a 31yr old Scottish league journeyman who had had 2 good seasons in the English lower leagues would be good enough for the premier league said somet along the lines of “I’ve worked with him for the last 2 seasons & have absolutely no doubt that he is good enough”. And finally who was it who (in a time when the club has less cash to splash than it used to) spent a rumoured £4.5mill on a striker with a record of 1 goal in 30 odd top flight appearances??
You got it in one – It was Bobby. So if he is handicapped by having to work with those players then its his own faultThat said, trying to compare Martinez to Guardiola has given me one of the best laughs I’ve had in ages!!! And fair play for trying
Difficult one this – I almost wrote a whole article on the subject for JayT to publish on the forum in response to the other thread but got side-tracked.For me, it’s not quite so black or white, dark or light as simply being pro- or anti-Martinez. What exactly does that mean?
If being anti means you think he’s not good enough to manage our team and pro is the opposite, how exactly do you measure it? Maybe relegation would be the tipping point to make you anti, or for those who think we should be doing better than just premier league survival, not being in the top 10 might be the trigger, for example. For others, they are anti, I guess, simply because they don’t like the style of play that he favours.
For me, when I say that I am pro-Martinez, it goes beyond league position and winning football matches. I happen to like the way he tries to play football, though I appreciate that others don’t. It frustrates the life out of me at times when he refuses to budge from his Plan A, but I still like what Plan A is trying to achieve. I get that it might ultimately end in relegation this season but so what? It doesn’t make me an idiot for thinking that way, anymore than it means that the people who insist that playing 442 will solve all our ills are idiots.
I also like the fact that his time as manager of the team is coinciding with a period in which the club’s management seems to be trying to ensure the long-term financial stability of the club by not paying daft transfer fees and salaries across the board. He hasn’t thrown his toys out of the pram on this issue which some might say makes him a “yes” man; I prefer to think that it makes him someone who has bought into the long-term view of WAFC and not someone who is just looking to use it as a stepping stone to bigger and better things.
I don’t know whether Martinez will ever go on to become a great coach, but I am happy that he is being given the opportunity to try to learn and make his way at our club. Paul Ince, for one I reckon, would have given his eye teeth for the same amount of patience to have been shown to him at Blackburn.
When TyldesleyLatic says on the other thread that the ‘light’ side must hold their hands up and say Martinez isn’t good enough if we get relegated, I disagree. It all depends on the answer to the question: “good enough, for what”?
As my granny used to say: “That’ll be 50 quid, Wayne”. :shock: She also used to say: “It would make for a very boring world if we all thought the same way”
Yours in sport
CJGGriff – I should point out that I did not say that the lightside should hold their hands up & say Martinez isn’t good enough if we get relegated
What I actually said was that if we get relegated & if we continue to struggle next season & if Martinez is released or his contract isn’t renewed then (by the same token as jrfatfan said the darkside must all say well done to bobby if we stay up) then the lightside must hold their hands up & say he just wasn’t good enough
By saying that I am in effect acknowledging that relegation this season isn’t necessarily an accurate marker that he isn’t good enough long term. It will have meant that he’s failed in his goal this season but many clubs have taken 1 step back to then go 2 steps forward
Bobby himself however in the most recent fanzine interview said that once we’ve got through this season then he “promises” us the club will not look back. If it does then IMO he needs to fall on his own swordI actually agree with the rest of your post however that its not as simple as being pro or anti martinez & this poll isn’t worded how I would have worded it when trying to see whether people think Bobby is up to the job long term or not.
If people are going to use the terms pro or anti Martinez then I am neither. I want him to succeed coz I liked him as a player here & I do think he has a genuine passion for the club (though that’s not to say that i don’t think he’d be offski if a better offer came along like some on here think) BUT over what I’ve seen for the last 2 seasons I don’t think that he’s good enough.
The style of football he tries to play is irrelevant to me – I like up & at em, full blooded, get stuck in there football but I’d accept owt at Latics if it was successful. Where I don’t think he’s good enough is his refusal to see that there is possibly more than one way to skin a cat & an inability to learn from his mistakes – or if he does seem to learn then it takes a bloody long time for it to sink in
Griff – you see that as frustrating but forgivable coz you like what plan A is trying to achieve. I call it arrogance, pig headedness & could ultimately be responsible for seeing the club relegated for only the 2nd time in its history. I know that’s not the be all & end all and the majority of us will still support Latics no matter what division they’re in but a) I don’t want to see my club fail & b) I have no confidence from what I’ve seen of Bobby that he is the right man to get the first team progressing againNice attempt, and well wriggled, but frankly my man, you’re talking guff.Are you honestly trying to claim the anti-Martinez gang outnumber the pro-Martinezers by around 10 to 1? (Incidentally, none of your posts have been included as anti)
Each time we have a poll. The results come out 50/50 pro v anti. It’s quite often the same posters starting ant-Martinez threads, sometimes 3 or 4 threads per defeat.
The Darksiders are more likely to post during a hissy fit following a defeat than the ‘Martinez Fan Club’ are to post joyous celebrations following a win.
It doesn’t matter how you try to stand your ground on this, it’s so blatantly obvious that even Di Santo (back to that analogy) couldn’t miss – providing it wasn’t from a corner by Watson, in which case it would be over his head or would have already hit the first defender.
Admirable though your reasoning is, even you must be able to see that you’re forced to hoist a white flag on this debate.
No I’m not claiming the anti-Martinez camp outnumber the pro-Martinez camp 10 to 1. I never said that & nor by referring to your stats could that be inferred. Your own research shows that from the games selected there were 69 anti-Bobby posts & 13 pro-Bobby posts so I make that about 5.3 to 1 just using those stats alone.
From the Latics fans I know as friends & talk to through work not one of them thinks Bobby is up to the job.
When I’ve been to games this season the overwhelming number of people sat round thing don’t think he’s up to the job from the comments I hear.
So I’d say that the anti-Martinez camp does outnumber the pro-Martinex camp & that’s reflected in the number of posts you have shown
I haven’t seen a poll on here asking whether Bobby is up to the job & certainly haven’t voted in one so I can’t acknowledge your 50/50 claim one way or the other although as I’ve said it isn’t my own personal experienceAs I’ve said as sure as you can guarantee “Bobby Out” posts after a defeat & often who will post them I can guarantee that after every good performance or victory there will be “Where are the darksiders now?”, “The Corner has been turned” etc.. and often you can guess who will have posted them
Its so blatantly obvious that even Aghahowa, unmarked in the middle of goal with not even the keeper to beat, couldn’t miss
In summary and to stop me :angry-banghead: , yes you can guarantee darkside posts after every defeat but likewise there are lightside posts in the opposite circumstances & even your own stats back that up. Also yes there are more darkside posts than lightside ones after each type of result but its my belief that the darkside is bigger in number than the lightside & by a relatively large margin
No white flags ;)
Tyldesley, that is so wide of the mark it could have come from Di Santo’s boot itself, and saddo that I am, I have gone back over historical pages just to prove a point. (The current season starts on page 40, so if anyone else has the inclination, please feel free to check. It’ll take you 20 mins maximum.)I’ve taken twelve significant games, six positive / six negative, and counted the relevant negative/positive threads they’ve generated.
Negative:
Blackpool (lost) – 18 anti-Martinez threads
Chelsea (lost) – 10 anti-Martinez threads
Blackburn (lost) – 8 anti-Martinez threads
West Ham (lost) – 15 anti-Martinez threads
Arsenal (lost) – 11 anti-Martinez threads
West Brom (draw) – 7 anti-Martinez threadsPositive:
West Brom (won) – 2 pro-Martinez threads
Wolves (won) – 1 pro-Martinez thread
Arsenal (draw) – 1 pro-Martinez thread
Blackburn (won) – 3 pro-Martinez threads
Birmingham (won) – 3 pro-Martinez threads
Blackpool (won) – 3 pro-Martinez threadsYes there is often tit-for-tat, and quite often a lot more tit than tat, but the anti-Martinez crowd are by the far the most active with knee-jerk reactions.
Whilst I like your Di Santo analogy Standish, all your stats do is prove the point I made in my last post
Yes, many of the anti-Bobby brigade will be out in force when Latics have had a bad performance &/or result but by the same token so are the pro-Bobby brigade when Latics have had a good result/performance
Yes the amounts of posts are less numerous but to me that just indicates that the anti-Bobby brigade are more numerous than their counterparts and based over what’s been seen over the majority of the last 2 seasons that’s hardly surprisingMy point, however poorly or boringly (sorry jrfatfan ;) ) made is that its hypocritical to slate the “darkside” for their posts when the “lightside” do exactly the same only they’re less in number
However boring & repetitive the lightside may find the darksides posts its no more or less boring or repetitive than the darkside find the lightside’s posts about “give him time”, “he’s trying to change our style of play”, “his hands are tied with finances”, “you’re not a true supporter unless you back the manager” etc…. whether its in messageboard posts or in lead articles on the websiteIf you want one side to stop then the other side has to stop too – IMHO
You’ve totally missed the point unless you have not been a regular viewer on here all season.
There’s a big difference between the darkside coming on here moaning like old washer women every time we lose and the likes of me, or the lightside if you so wish, defending our club and manager when these “fans” come on with a bitter hatred flavour in their posts.
I’ve not started one thread all season claiming Bobby’s doing a great job and will keep us up. I have no reason to hold my hands up for anything at the end of the season.
However, just count all the threads posted about him taking us down [starting from Sept / Oct last year] some actually state he has already relegated us FFS!!Can you see the subtle difference?
PS If you gave a bad decision at the match you reffed, too true you may have cost them the game. Blasting over a penalty by the team, doesn’t make your bad decision indefensible. :roll:
I don’t give bad decisions – I give correct ones!!!! ;)
Your comment however illustrates one of the points I was making
If Latics go down it will be because the manager, squad etc.. were not good enough. If Latics stay up it will be because they were good enough. Any team in the land will point to any number of decisions given or not given by the ref & their opponents will point to any number that did go there wayAs for the other parts of your reply – I didn’t miss your point at all. I merely replied & said that IF latics stay up & if there is some progression on last season then he deserves credit for that & I will give it to him.
I merely also pointed out that IF Latics go down & IF we then proceed to struggle next season then thos on the lightside, by the same token, should hold there hands up & say you know what he isn’t/wasn’t good enough & won’t be no matter how long he is given in the job
I don’t recall mentioning anywhere that you had started any threads praising Bobby nor that there were as many pro-Bobby threads as there were anti-Bobby threads. However, whilst you brought that up there are regular lead articles on this websites homepage that are pro-Bobby & which accuse those who don’t think he’s up to the job & are vocal about it as “not true supporters” including 2 in the last weekIMO supporters of latics (pro or anti Bobby) are entitled to voice their opinions of whether they do or don’t think he’s the right man for the job at any point during the course of a season and or offer him praise/criticism after any game as they see fit. You’re right though that its ridiculous to say he’s relegated us (or kept us up) at any point until that is mathematically certain
One other thing I would take issue with in what you said however was the comment that many of the darkside are on here like washer women after every defeat telling everyone he isn’t good enough. Whilst its true to a certain extent when you come on here after Latics have played well & got a good result you can guarantee that they’ll be numerous posts claiming “where are all the whinging darkside tonight? They don’t like it when Bobby rams their claims down their throats etc..”
One follows the other (in both cases) as sure as night follows day – its just more noticeable from the darkside & therefore appears far mroe regularlay coz the team loses far more than it wins & bad performances have tended to outweigh the good unsThey can’t be that good at home – Latics beat them there this season & last!!
I will praise a manager at a season’s end if he has made some form of progress on the previous season.
So if Latics stay up & in the process get more points & have a better goal difference than last season then Bobby will have made progress & he deserves credit for it – its also only my opinion but I do think that by & large the level of performances (if not results) have improved since February so I’ll credit him with that too.
I don’t think that long term he’s the right man for the job nor do I subscribe to his belief that if we stay up this season then the club will really kick on next season but I hope ot be proved wrong.
That said however jrfatfan – your list of all the things he’s had to put up with just reads like an apologists list & conveniently glosses over the many things he has got wrong at times & the things he continues to get wrong.
The dismissal of him wasting £6.5mill of the club’s money on Boselli as a gamble worth taking but which unfortunately back fired & Bobby can’t be blamed conveniently glosses over he fact that our former director football reported back to Whelan that he didn’t think that a) he was up to the rigours of the premier league & b) was suited to Bobby’s system. Which in turn led to Bobby kicking off, the director of football leaving, Bobby getting his way & a very substantial & scarce amount of money getting wasted. Football is all about opinions but Bobby got it badly wrong with Boselli & if Latics stay up despite this mistake it was a mistake that Bobby must take full responsibility for
Likewise blaming poor refereeing is the refuge of the desparate – I say that as a ref who copped an earful yesterday at full time from a player who said I cost his team the game. The same player who had blasted a penalty 10 yards over the bar in the 1st half yet it was my fault they lost!! latics will have had as many ropey reffing decisions go their way as they will have had go against them. if they go down its coz they weren’t good enough & not coz of the refereesIf you want to see the “darkside” praise Bobby if Latics stay up then by the same token if Latics go down this season & then struggle next season & he is sacked or hsi contract isn’t renewed I hope that those on the “lightside” who have said that “he just needs time” will hold their hands up & say “sorry Darkside, you were right all along he just wasn’t up to the job” – or will it all have been the ref’s fault or down to “international call ups”?????
I only saw the game on Football First as i was reffing but even as a fully paid up member of the darkside I have very little to complain about from Saturday’s game either from the players or manager
Yes, it was an idiotic handball from Rodallega but these things have happened to far better players than him.
On the performance itself, I sat watching it at times on Sunday morning thinking Latics were playing some really good stuff. On top of that they were creating chances & on top of that rather than the failure to convert these chances being down to poor finishing (as has often been the case) it was more often down to some top notch goalkeeping
I couldn’t tell from the footage whether Latcis sat back after going in front but the stats show pretty much even possession & Latics having far more efforts at goal. The match reports I read also mentioned the quality of Latcis defendingLooking forward when i did that BBC predictor I had this game down as a draw & Latics stilll staying up so that doesn’t change my outlook in that respect (although we could have done without Blackburn winning as i think they’ll get at least 1 point from their remaining games which’ll probably be enough to stay up). I’m a little more optimistic that Latics can get somet from Villa after seeing how both teams fared at the weekend but the darkside in me still thinks it unlikely that the team can put in 2 positive performances in a row & that they’ll be a blip in there somewhere
I quite like it as a spectator sport at times (depending on the game) & have played (end enjoyed it) at school & university
but I don’t have anywhere enough interest in it to have the desire to fork out my hard earned cash to watch it on a regular basis or even to have a team whose results I look out for – at a push my team would either be Leigh (being a bongsmon) who I have paid to watch in the past or St Helens (being my adopted hometown)I dislike the Warriors & their supporters with a passion for reasons too long winded & dull to go in to
I think you’ll find that it was somet along them lines!!
-
AuthorPosts


